This whistleblower testimony raises serious probity concerns on another of @boulware_dr's trials "designed to fail".... this time the ACTIV-6 IVM trial.

It is not possible that this trial could have shown a benefit.

This is big.
And a reminder that @boulware_dr was involved in another trial that "killed off" #hydroxychloroquine in 2020 for similar reasons.

In that study he "forgot" to declare his relationship with Gilead and then went overboard on the next paper. Methinks thou dost protest too much?
In that same trial Boulware claimed that they used folic acid as a placebo "because it was similar in appearance to hydroxychloroquine"

That was not true. See for yourself.

The problem is that folic acid is an active treatment candidate.
So, what are the odds that the Boulware study happened to choose a "placebo" that was subsequently (and preemptively) known to be a furin inhibitor when a study was being conducted into a treatment for the only sars-like virus with a furin site?…
And of course, in the final coincidence the Boulware study was published in the same journal - the infamous @NEJM that published the diabolical #surgisphere #lancetgate fraud.

We caught them that time...
@chrismartenson @franklin_reeder

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Jikky the mouse 🐭

Jikky the mouse 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheJikky

Nov 11
This was gross misinformation.
Why is a @UKHSA staffer who is not a doctor giving medical advice that she doesn't understand the clinical implications of?
Is there rampant bias at the UKHSA?
@profnfenton @MartinNeil9
This is serious. If the @UKHSA staff have inherent bias and are then found to be misrepresenting the UK's vaccine surveillance data to oversell an ineffective and unsafe vaccine, people could have died as result.

This was a hugely biased study published by @Vnafilyan of the @ONS using data that they then refused to allow free and open inspection of.

In the absence of transparency of government data one can only assume bias at best, corruption at worst.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!