Office held by constitutional
functionaries in public trust are not open to denigration in a court of
law by self-styled warriors of public interest, the #DelhiHighCourt has observed while dismissing a PIL against appointment of Justice #DYChandrachud as #CJI.
A division of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad says that while wishful thinking is not a prohibited activity, but when it forms part of the grounds of a petition before the court, it amounts to an abuse of the process of the court.
The PIL by one Sanjeev Kumar Tiwari, president of an organisation named Gram Uday Foundation had made several unsubstantiated allegations against Justice Chandrachud. The High had imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner.
The court said that a similar petition has already been dismissed by the SC and therefore the petitioner chose to come to HC "camouflaging the same issue as a fresh cause, which
reflects on his oblique motive and highlights the questionable credentials of
the Petitioner".
The court further said that it has now become a fashion to approach the court making scandalous allegations against the judges and therefore the petition is nothing but an abuse of the process of law. #DelhiHighCourt #CJIDYChandrachud
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Breaking A special bench of Delhi High Court headed by Justice Siddharth Mridul says it has to consider whether it would be able to hear Delhi riots bail appeals or not. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots
Eight bail appeals including those of Sharjeel Imam, Khalid Saifi, Ishrat Jahan and several others is pending before the bench.
The bench also comprises Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar. #DelhiHighCourt#DelhiRiots
#SupremeCourt to hear plea by the National Testing Agency against Madras HC order which directed authorities concerned to award 4 grace marks to an unsuccessful SC aspirant for MBBS course for prescribing a wrong question in NEET conducted by the NTA
SG Tushar Mehta: there is a short question by the effect is cascading!
SG: We have quoted our rule. if a question was found to be incorrect by us or dropped 4 marks was to be attended to those who attempted the question. in this Q he did not attend it at all
CJI: There were 5 choices for this question. but there was no such option at all
Effect of Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association's decision to abstain from work to protest Justice Nikhil Kariel's proposed transfer could be seen in Gujarat High Court today, with most courtrooms wearing a deserted look
Chief Justice's court hall is empty
Sibal: this is a prosecution by the state police. Special bench was formed and Justice Ajay Rastogi was added to it.
Justice DY Chandrachud: I have a feeling an order was passed on this mentioning item. Please call one of the staff members. I cannot say anything off the cuff
CJI: If I am mistaken and no order was on this, we will ofcourse hear you.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear separate applications moved by #BhimaKoregaon accused Gautam Navlakha, in which he alleged delay to implement SC's order granting him #housearrest, and the NIA's plea to cancel his house arrest due to bias in medical records among other grounds
SG Tushar Mehta: NIA has filed an IA and it was filed at 6:05 pm. CJI had passed an order yesterday asking both applications to be listed before you #GautamNavlakha
#SatyendarJain is not entitled to the benefit of bail having regard to the twin conditions provided in Section 45 of the PMLA — Special Judge, Rouse Avenue Courts.
#SatyendarJain was actually involved in concealing the proceeds of crime by giving cash to the Kolkata based entry operators…By this process, the proceeds of crime to the tune of 1/3rd of Rs 4.61 Crore has been laundered — Special Judge.