We've noticed a lot of drama re-emerging with the @DCMS IDVT (Identity Verification Technology) & the use of IDSP's (Identity Service Providers) which is something that we & @TruthTalkUK covered since 2021.
Some call it 'the end of freedom', but let's revisit what it is:
Since April 2022, landlords, employers & DBS checks may be conducted by using a IDSP to verify British or Irish citizens ID credentials.
The 'objective' is to improve mobility & to enhance security rather than using less secure methods. This *maybe* useful for remote workers.
The most important thing to note - not only is the scheme *not mandatory*, but other methods of verification must be made available for onboarding such as doing so in person e.g. landlord/employer or using the relevant UK Govt gateway in the process, e.g. DBS.
One concerning aspect of all of this is whether or not the *right to choose* other less invasive verification methods may be removed over the course of time, i.e. employers/landlords are forced to ensure people use IDVT for *all* checks or face fines etc.
Another is how all of this ties in with the UK Govt's 'OneLogin' system which is now live for five processes but hopes to fully onboard citizens from 2025.
OneLogin would provide a 'unique identifier' for citizens to access a range of Govt e-services as well as being available on a standalone mobile application.
This is also a source of concern surrounding privacy and surveillance due to identifiers & how data is tracked.
In summary, IDVT isn't the 'end of freedom', as some declared, but it's an important piece of the jigsaw puzzle of how many govts are pushing forward with #digitalidentity and their own digital transformation goals.
🧵Reform of the NI Public Health Act [1967] towards a new Public Health Bill requires intense scrutiny before any proposals could be progressed.
But for some at the DoH, the thirst for power since COVID-19 is insatiable. Very concerning.
1. An 'all hazards' approach with permanent powers is simply too broad in scope & would highly likely interfere with fundamental rights.
2. There's no imperative or strict legal duty with WHO agreements to amend such legislation. The UK interpret these as 'recommendations'.
[contd.] 3. Human Rights Act [HRA] legislation wasn't respected throughout 2020-22 with the Coronavirus Act [2020] as these rights can be arbitrarily suspended.
'Foundry' is the name of the data integration & analytics platform set to be used by the NHS as part of its Federated Data Plaform (FDP) which has sparked numerous privacy concerns around the handling of patient data.
(contd.)
Last year we looked at an example of the licensing Terms & Conditions of a Palantir contract circa. 2020.
🟥 What is the 'other data' that Palantir may collect with Foundry? A very broad & unclear term.
🟥 Where's it stored & does it leave the country where processing occurs.
🟥 Will patient data leave the United Kingdom & be processed elsewhere like the #EU or 'other locations'.
🟥 Where are these 'other locations'.
🟥 Which 'third party' is involved in the 'datacentre security standards'.
America have stopped printing #COVID19 vaccination records which could used for international travel.
The #NHS still have a COVID-Pass available until 31st March 2024 even though there's SEVEN countries left in the world with entry measures.
Here's the list of countries where @SteveBarclay @DHSCgovuk @UKHSA still think it's necessary & proportionate to continue wasting UK tax payers money on this useless scheme.
It's a joke.
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC
LIBYA
NAURU
NORTH KOREA
PITCAIRN ISLANDS
SOUTH SUDAN
TURKMENISTAN
Since the WHO ended the #COVID19 PHEIC on 5th May, there's been a major de-escalation of remaining countries enforcing COVID entry measures.
You can even travel to #China & #NorthKorea unhindered, except NK will quarantine visitors for 30 days according to their guidelines.
🧵The Crime & Policing MP @CPhilpOfficial may view the integration & amalgamation of multiple national databases using AI to tackle crime as a 'gamechanger'.
But there are serious risks for the data & privacy of everyday citizens. We explain more in this thread 👇
🟥 Cybersecurity: Criminals may attempt to exploit vulnerabilities in the systems used to integrate & store data.
Hacking, malware, or ransomware attacks, could compromise the integrity & availability of data.
🟥 Data Breaches: Combining multiple databases may increase the risk of data breaches.
Unauthorized access could allow criminals & other malicious actors to a wealth of sensitive data.
An 'anonymous IT reporter' who claims to have spent a lot of time petitioning against COVID-Passes & raised this on TalkRadio 'thinks' national ID cards are a 'bad idea' but their modern equivalent is OK.
Zero mention of the #OnlineSafetyBill, implications on encryption, & amendments to the Snoopers Charter which could see companies like Apple having to run their latest security/privacy updates by the State & at the risk of the public not knowing about it.
Modern digital identity systems don't necessarily mean 'more safe', even if open source.
For example, #WorldCoin runs a open source protocol which hasn't deterred criminals from stealing passwords & injecting malware into the iris-scanning devices: