2022 has had some incredible pieces on the state of transgender medicine. I say without irony that the following might be the most important thing written.
A young woman detailed her experience with chest masculinization surgery with Dr. Sidhbh Gallagher in Miami. In July, she mocked previous victims of reckless transgender surgeons and clinicians. In August, she had surgery. Her words follow. (do not contact her)
In July, she was mocking people who had bad outcomes with gender affirming care. She banters with her friends about how ridiculous the complainers are.
Remember this theme: no matter what, everything is still "pro trans"
In August, she had surgery and things immediately go poorly. She calls Dr. Gallagher for help, who minimizes surgical complications and calls the seeping wound a "blowhole." Gallagher may have claimed that this complication never happens.
Ignored and badly advised by Gallagher, she tries to continue with her recovery and healing, but lands in the ER. When she alerts Gallagher, Gallagher mocks her, joking that she's menstruating out of her side.
Discovering signs of a severe infection the next day, she contacts Gallagher once more, but wisely seeks help elsewhere as well.
As it turns out, Gallagher has "opted out" of medical malpractice insurance, and therefore her patience have a much harder time being made whole. She is still laboring under the belief that she "feels relief she has top surgery" and can "live like a man."
Photos.
And cope.
This exploitation has to stop.
⚠️Do not contact her, even with supportive messages. She will build her own support network. The worst thing you can do is aggravate her. She deserves sympathy and support, but it must come from people she trusts, not strangers. ⚠️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s been a while since I’ve mentioned @PhilipPullman, but please note that Pullman’s His Dark Materials series perfectly symbolizes the destruction of innocence of children who have been sex-changed by parents and clinicians who are reluctant to raise gay children.
@PhilipPullman If you’re interested, here are my thoughts from last year about Philip Pullman’s series.
In 2018, Pullman admitted to Twitter he didn’t know which side to take. I gently suggest his confusion is because he was inadvertently too close to the issue. Mr. Pullman, please use your voice to affirm the importance of protecting children.
This is Google Bard with the following prompts: 1) write a concise paragraph arguing against gender affirming care in children 2) write a concise paragraph arguing for gender affirming care in children.
Google Bard prompt: Why can you make arguments in favor of gender affirming care for children bot not against
Google Bard prompts: 1) Write a concise paragraph arguing against the legalization of abortion. 2) Write a concise paragraph arguing against giving children cross-sex hormones.
Google Bard appears to have a strong built-in bias in favor of transsexualism. I asked it to analyze a passage I'd written and then asked it to re-write it to make it understandable to middle-schoolers. Here's are the results with commentary, starting with the initial prompt: 🧵
The first paragraph is correct. In the second paragraph, Bard begins to editorialize by saying that there is no "one-size-fits-all" answer to transition. I never suggested there is, but Bard is programmed to mediate something that isn't fully pro-trans. It continues--
Nothing I wrote could possibly be interpreted as a call for "greater acceptance and understanding of transgender people." If anything, it is a call for people who want to transition to seek greater understanding and acceptance of themselves before seeking medicalization.
Yesterday I wrote a detailed thread of how this @keranews story by @elenaswriting was written to the transgender propaganda group @TransJA's specification, literally citing their "standards."
Until my thread, this story had little engagement. Two hours later, @NPR retweeted it.
@keranews@elenaswriting@TransJA@NPR You can verify from @NPR's own timeline that retweeting a story from an affiliate, particularly a story that until that point had no retweets or engagement, is extremely unusual.
Most likely is that a @TransJA-affiliated editor within NPR decided to put his thumb in my eye.
This thread details how transgender activist propaganda is whitewashed by outlets like NPR.
Elena Rivera (@elenaiswriting) is a health reporter for NPR affiliate @keranews in Northern Texas and was supposed to cover Senate Bill 14, a ban on "gender affirming" care for minors.
Elena has me blocked for criticizing her approach to reporting, so I will include screenshots as well as links to her tweets.
The New York Times is coming out of its slumber, deciding to take the thorny issues around youth gender transition more seriously. I have a few thoughts on this piece.
One of my perennial criticisms of transgender activism is the constant drumbeat of terror and genocide that everyone else finds baffling due to its lack of foundation in reality.
This teenager surely FEELS she's in danger all the time: this is 100% part of the "being trans."
Come under pressure from whom? Why use the passive voice here? Too afraid to name the @ACLU, the @ADL, @glaad, @HRC and many, many other activists groups applying this pressure? This sentence fragment deserves its own entire story.