Why do "top tier" publishers like @Forbes not only publish this, but also pin the tweet?
At least they realized the first summary was too much so they deleted ... but reposted with a different one and pinned again.
DONT GLORIFY CRIMINALS. THEY ARE NOT MISUNDERSTOOD GENIUSES.
At least they realized the first summary was too much so they deleted ... but reposted with a different one and pinned again.
DONT GLORIFY CRIMINALS. THEY ARE NOT MISUNDERSTOOD GENIUSES.
There is no "Crypto hierarcy" to climb. What she did was not crypto. She just went into a very non-crypto firm that has non-transparent and as it turns out fraudulent books, doing white collar crime.
That's not crypto. That's wall street 101.
That's not crypto. That's wall street 101.
Why try to describe her in a favorable light?
SHE STOLE BILLIONS OF CUSTOMER FUNDS.
SHE STOLE BILLIONS OF CUSTOMER FUNDS.
Probably the most annoying thing here is describing her as a "math wiz"?!?!
That's an insult to people who are actually good at math.
That's an insult to people who are actually good at math.
Lets put things in perspective for the "misunderstood geniuses who made a mistake"
- Aaron Swartz was pushed to take his own life for downloading research papers
- @alex_pertsev is in jail for writing #opensource code
- Virgil Griffith is in prison for talking in a NK conference
- Aaron Swartz was pushed to take his own life for downloading research papers
- @alex_pertsev is in jail for writing #opensource code
- Virgil Griffith is in prison for talking in a NK conference
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
