@COVID_19_Canada The index scores correspond to the percent excess all-cause mortality due to COVID we expect.
For example, we expect ~6% excess mortality for the week ending Nov 18 in Canada.
@COVID_19_Canada The annual average % excess all-cause mortality for the epidemic to date in Canada is 7% (after adjusting for any excess deaths attributable to accidents, suicie, toxic drugs and heat dome).
That's about 21K untimely (extra) deaths/year. From QC data it looks like most is COVID.
@COVID_19_Canada We don't have all-cause mortality reporting for 2022 for most of Canada, but we do have it to Sep 3/22 for 4 fast-reporting provinces: AB, BC, QC and NL.
So far, during Omicron avg % excess mortality in these provinces is 12%. Their average for the epidemic to date is 9%.
@COVID_19_Canada A MAJOR concern is that excess mortality (black line in graph) has been increasing quickly in these provinces over 2022, and is currently at the highest point of the epidemic so far.
This is without all reporting in yet, especially the most recent deaths.
We should be concerned
@COVID_19_Canada If we are seeing 12% excess mortality across Canada during Omicron, this means 36,000 excess (untimely) deaths by December of this year.
By our estimates, as of Nov 18 there have been over 37,000 Omicron deaths in Canada, with 52% of these deaths undetected/unreported.
@COVID_19_Canada I focus a lot on deaths because they're the easiest indicator to assess using data sources independent of provincial data reporting differences.
They're the tip of the iceberg indicator--they give a sense of the scale of the underlying problem.
@COVID_19_Canada You can find a lot of the details in the weekly report linked at the top of this thread, and in our Excess Mortality Tracker at the link here:
@COVID_19_Canada Our estimates of total COVID mortality during Omicron are similar to the % excess mortality we expect for Canada, based on fast-reporting provinces (12-15%).
They're also similar to COVID mortality estimates from models such as IHME.
Anyway, for all the difference it makes.
@COVID_19_Canada OK, following are the weekly COVID "weather reports" for individual provinces.
Yes, we will have less number-y, easier/faster to read versions soon. These are a placeholder!
@COVID_19_Canada I suspect that "HIGH" may be the baseline. Estimated total infections have been declining from a high peak in late October, but that decline looks like it may be slowing.
Several provinces that have been stably high (NL, QC, SK) have increasing waste water signal.
@COVID_19_Canada These provinces don't appear to have gone through surges as intense as other regions over the last few weeks (see coloured grid below), so I'm not sure if this means they're about to go through the same as others.
Here are the weekly weather reports.
CANADA
VERY HIGH COVID hazard, but improving slowly
1 in 39 people infected
0.8-1.1 million infections per week
If this keeps going, Canada may fall to HIGH hazard in next week or two.
Unfortunately, no data were posted by PHAC for any Northern Territory this week, although we finally have waste water tracking for Haines Junction at the entrance to the beautiful Kluane National Park, Yukon!!!
Usually, as long as we have test positivity data for the 3 territories and data for at least the Yukon, we can try to estimate the situation compared to neighbouring provinces. However, this week we only have waste water from Haines Junction (signal is declining there BTW).
So, unfortunately this week I won't share the COVID weather report for the North (although based on trends in last week's data and waste water I think the hazard is likely currently HIGH but declining).
Sorry about that, Northern friends. We try really hard to do a report for you, but we need a bit more data. I'm hoping that we haven't lost all national reporting for the region. I may have to start digging around to see how we can standardize territorial government sources.
Finally, need incentive to start wearing your (high quality) mask again?
Here's the current @IHME_UW projection for how many lives could be saved if 80% of Canadians started masking again today.
@IHME_UW By Christmas Day, we could cut daily COVID deaths in half if 80% of Canadians start masking again today. We were doing that until Feb or March of this year. We can do it again.
What better present could we give than saving a life and preventing the grief of so many families.
@IHME_UW Without 80% of us wearing masks again, the IHME projection predicts that we'll continue to grind along for months much as we are now, with a steady 5-6% excess mortality and hospitals at 5-10% over-capacity from COVID alone, not to mention flu and RSV.
@IHME_UW Reducing excess mortality from 5% to 2.5% by masking in high risk periods might prevent 7,500 untimely deaths/year. That's double the average annual mortality of flu in Canada.
#CovidIsAirborne #CovidIsntOver #MaskUp #YallMasking #CleanTheAir #CovidCautious
Holiday Dance Night
Risk Scenario Estimator Based on Canadian Forecast
The full thread is also available on the C-19 website, starting on page 8, for easier reading.
Note: Forecast data will be posted on the weekend, those pages on the website have not been updated.
Holiday Dance Night
Nanny and her diabetic teen granddaughter are a high risk household. Because they are vulnerable, they have to miss inside family gatherings much more than they’d like in order to protect themselves . They both would love to celebrate with the rest of their friends and family on New Years Eve at the community Holiday Dance Night.
But is there any way to make it safe enough for them?
Many of us know, live with, or are vulnerable. We have a lot of people in our communities who are immune compromised, immune suppressed, or have long COVID. People who have to be extra careful about infections. It’s a lonely journey to keep safe these days, often having to stay away from events with crowds.
So, just how risky are those community gatherings?
There’s a Dance Night at the high school gym coming up. About 60 folks dancing to tunes for a couple hours, it would be so much fun to join in.
The Data Card, “Family Holiday Dinner - Before”, shows how wise it is for everyone to mask while visiting inside.
We looked at a group of 10 people, you’re one of them, gathering for a 3 hour visit. People are chatting, but it’s mostly a quiet group enjoying each other’s company.
The scenario uses an average size dining room, 16 x 32. The airflow is well mixed among this and the other rooms and the outside doors are closed.
What can you do?
What can you do? Open the windows.
What can you do?
You can make your event even more safe by providing rapid tests beforehand and N95 masks as people arrive. This lets everyone know that you care about their health.
What else can you do?
Set up an Outside Food Zone. ™
If the weather is, ahem, wintery, and you have the resources, get a fire pit going.
Explore other ways to warm the space, maybe candles, those amazing patio heaters, or a tether ball to kick to warm everyone up. Don’t forget to provide gloves and blankets too.
Create an inviting space for people to bring their food out, unmask, safely eat at a distance from the crowd. When they’re ready they can join the folks inside again knowing that they are helping to keep everyone safe.
The “Family Holiday Dinner - Before” Card shows the maximum risk people that take on. We’re using the safest estimate for one-off events that often have visitors from away, may include a super spreader, and carry higher potential risks.
Your most vulnerable people will want to use these estimates since, for us, it’s best to assess risk by assuming the worst.