@COVID_19_Canada The index scores correspond to the percent excess all-cause mortality due to COVID we expect.
For example, we expect ~6% excess mortality for the week ending Nov 18 in Canada.
@COVID_19_Canada The annual average % excess all-cause mortality for the epidemic to date in Canada is 7% (after adjusting for any excess deaths attributable to accidents, suicie, toxic drugs and heat dome).
That's about 21K untimely (extra) deaths/year. From QC data it looks like most is COVID.
@COVID_19_Canada We don't have all-cause mortality reporting for 2022 for most of Canada, but we do have it to Sep 3/22 for 4 fast-reporting provinces: AB, BC, QC and NL.
So far, during Omicron avg % excess mortality in these provinces is 12%. Their average for the epidemic to date is 9%.
@COVID_19_Canada A MAJOR concern is that excess mortality (black line in graph) has been increasing quickly in these provinces over 2022, and is currently at the highest point of the epidemic so far.
This is without all reporting in yet, especially the most recent deaths.
We should be concerned
@COVID_19_Canada If we are seeing 12% excess mortality across Canada during Omicron, this means 36,000 excess (untimely) deaths by December of this year.
By our estimates, as of Nov 18 there have been over 37,000 Omicron deaths in Canada, with 52% of these deaths undetected/unreported.
@COVID_19_Canada I focus a lot on deaths because they're the easiest indicator to assess using data sources independent of provincial data reporting differences.
They're the tip of the iceberg indicator--they give a sense of the scale of the underlying problem.
@COVID_19_Canada You can find a lot of the details in the weekly report linked at the top of this thread, and in our Excess Mortality Tracker at the link here:
@COVID_19_Canada Our estimates of total COVID mortality during Omicron are similar to the % excess mortality we expect for Canada, based on fast-reporting provinces (12-15%).
They're also similar to COVID mortality estimates from models such as IHME.
Anyway, for all the difference it makes.
@COVID_19_Canada OK, following are the weekly COVID "weather reports" for individual provinces.
Yes, we will have less number-y, easier/faster to read versions soon. These are a placeholder!
@COVID_19_Canada I suspect that "HIGH" may be the baseline. Estimated total infections have been declining from a high peak in late October, but that decline looks like it may be slowing.
Several provinces that have been stably high (NL, QC, SK) have increasing waste water signal.
@COVID_19_Canada These provinces don't appear to have gone through surges as intense as other regions over the last few weeks (see coloured grid below), so I'm not sure if this means they're about to go through the same as others.
Here are the weekly weather reports.
CANADA
VERY HIGH COVID hazard, but improving slowly
1 in 39 people infected
0.8-1.1 million infections per week
If this keeps going, Canada may fall to HIGH hazard in next week or two.
Unfortunately, no data were posted by PHAC for any Northern Territory this week, although we finally have waste water tracking for Haines Junction at the entrance to the beautiful Kluane National Park, Yukon!!!
Usually, as long as we have test positivity data for the 3 territories and data for at least the Yukon, we can try to estimate the situation compared to neighbouring provinces. However, this week we only have waste water from Haines Junction (signal is declining there BTW).
So, unfortunately this week I won't share the COVID weather report for the North (although based on trends in last week's data and waste water I think the hazard is likely currently HIGH but declining).
Sorry about that, Northern friends. We try really hard to do a report for you, but we need a bit more data. I'm hoping that we haven't lost all national reporting for the region. I may have to start digging around to see how we can standardize territorial government sources.
Finally, need incentive to start wearing your (high quality) mask again?
Here's the current @IHME_UW projection for how many lives could be saved if 80% of Canadians started masking again today.
@IHME_UW By Christmas Day, we could cut daily COVID deaths in half if 80% of Canadians start masking again today. We were doing that until Feb or March of this year. We can do it again.
What better present could we give than saving a life and preventing the grief of so many families.
@IHME_UW Without 80% of us wearing masks again, the IHME projection predicts that we'll continue to grind along for months much as we are now, with a steady 5-6% excess mortality and hospitals at 5-10% over-capacity from COVID alone, not to mention flu and RSV.
@IHME_UW Reducing excess mortality from 5% to 2.5% by masking in high risk periods might prevent 7,500 untimely deaths/year. That's double the average annual mortality of flu in Canada.
During Omicron, PEI has reported 2.9 times fewer deaths per capita than Quebec and Manitoba, the Canadian provinces that do the best COVID death reporting.
@GovCanHealth As of November 6, only 43% of people 60 AND OLDER in Canada have received a new COVID vaccine dose or completed their primary series in the last 6 months.
BC 54%
QC 50%
MB 49%
NL 41%
ON 40%
NB 39%
SK 38%
NS 31%
AB 28%
YK 27%
NWT 22%
NUV 11%
This is not, not good.
@GovCanHealth PEI has not yet reported any data about numbers of people with new doses/completed primary series in last 6 months, so we don't know the situation there.
These are a temporary version of our weekly COVID "weather reports". We're working on versions with fewer numbers that are faster to read and understand.
🟠~1 in every 34 people currently infected
🟠~0.8-1.1M infections this week
🟠Infections, long COVID: SEVERE (~9x higher than pandemic low point)
🟠Hospitalizations: VERY HIGH (~7X higher than low point)
🟠Deaths: HIGH (~5x higher than low point)
@COVID_19_Canada For comparisons of reported and expected COVID deaths and excess mortality, we're now using 15 week averages for all.
Why? Because we want to be really sure we're not overestimating excess mortality in younger age groups where death numbers are smaller.
@COVID_19_Canada It looks a bit different than it did previously, but it's also easier to compare curves, especially if our estimates of when mortality waves happened in each province are off by a week or so.
I disagree about the benefit of small effect sizes...on a population scale they can be really important, especially given situation we're in. We routinely accept <50% effect sizes in medicine. And there are no safety risks of masking.
Because I'm so attuned to the COVID situation in Canada I URGENTLY believe we need mask mandates. We've slid into a situation where we need every bit of help. Frankly, we've been here for a year, but I only know that from following the epi data closely.
But Dr. Saxinger is right in that it's hard to point to large numbers of unequivocal studies if policy makers want pure black and white data to support decisions.