Bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri had last week ordered the State govt to place on record the entire agreement between Morbi Nagar Palika and private contractor for upkeep of the bridge.
State Human Rights Commission files an affidavit spelling out the status of compensation to the victims of the tragic incident, through Advocate A Ankani.
CJ Kumar: No other funds have been received from private donors?
AG: About Rs 5 crores are received. Around 20 children have lost both parents, they will get Rs 38 lakhs each.
CJ Kumar: Where do you say so?
AG: We haven't mentioned it in affidavit as I have just received instructions. But I guess Human Rights Commission has covered it.
CJ: We would want to know the break-up of all these amounts as to how much amt is from CM fund, how much from PM and also from private donors. We can't see such a break-up. Also, focus on distribution. Give it to us by next hearing.
CJ: Also, this Rs 4 lakh ex gratia from CM, we are not satisfied. You will have to do something. At least double the amount so that each one gets at least Rs 10 lakh.
Bench points out from list of deceased, one of whom was 35 year old.
CJ: He might be the earning member of family and survived by children, wife, ailing parents. How will they look after themselves now.
Bench passes an order, records the statements affirmed in the State Human Rights' Commission affidavit, with regards to the compensation paid to the deceased. It notes that 7 children have been orphaned in this incident and 12 have lost a parent.
Bench notes that one private entity has decided to pay Rs one lakh each to the victims. It notes that Adani Foundation through its CSR has extended sum of Rs 25 lakh for the victims.
CJ records in order - We are of the view that the compensation paid by the CM relief fund is abysmally on the lower side. We hope and trust, the said amounts would be made realist and also the need of the house is taken care of.
CJ: The compensation of Rs 50k paid to severely injured persons is also on the lower side. There is no record to the nature of injuries suffered by the injured persons. Thus, State to file fresh affidavit indicating the same so that compensation can be enhanced
CJ: Please don't do what you did in that matter saying for Gujarat kidney, we will give preference only to people of Gujarat. Please don't do that in this case.
CJ: Mr AG, when I was in Karnataka, I was part of a bench dealing with COVID-19 cases. Several questions came up, even the issue of deaths of people due to lack of oxygen. Point is, no one anticipated that. But now that this has opened up, u have to come up with policy.
CJ: This is how a policy is made. Policy makers should put their heads together so that a policy is made.
AG: In fact, one of the tasks of the SIT formed is this.
CJ: Who is heading it. We will want to attend the meeting.
CJ: Its high time that all the officials, who are either monitoring, managing, controlling such bridges across the State, should ensure that the bridges in their jurisdiction are in proper condition and usable.
CJ: We want details of how many bridges are there in this State, their existing conditions, duly certified by jurisdictional engineers, to be placed within 10 days from today.
Now, Sr Adv Devang Vyas makes submissions on behalf of Morbi Nagar Palika.
Bench seeks to know on what basis, was the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed with the Contractor.
Vyas: it was based on resolution by the then Rajkot Collector as the Naga Palika was not formed
Vyas: We came to picture only in March 2022, when the new agreement was signed subject to approval by our General Body.
CJ: If any report is filed by the SIT, the same should be placed before this court in a sealed cover. Also, files related to this incident, which aren't placed before us, to be submitted on next date of hearing.
Bench records in order that the affidavit filed by the Morbi Nagar Palika lacks details, which were sought by the court in previous hearing. It notes that the Palika's chief officer is present in the courtroom.
Bench records that the letter written by Contractor to the Palika Chief Officer with regards to repairs, management etc of the bridge is through negotiations. Hence, all files related to the bridge are ordered to be placed before the court.
Bench further notes that the Contractor had on December 29, 2021 told the Palika that accident might happen anytime given the bad condition of the bridge
Bench also notes that the Contractor had made "repeated requests" to Palika for carrying out repairs and renewing MoU but the civic body sought handing over of the bridge.
"Tenor of the letter (by Contractor) would show that it was concentrated on the rate of the ticket than the condition of the bridge. The Palika seems to have ignored the warnings signalled by the Contractor, regrding condition of the bridge," bench notes
"The exchange between the Contractor and the Palika is only for retention of the contract rather than bestowing attention for repair of the bridge, which was in a critical stage," Bench notes.
"The ratification of the MoU by the General Body of thr Nagar Palika has not taken place. It is admitted that the Contractor was operating the bridge for 13 years and even used it in absence of non-renewal of agreement," bench states.
CJ: What about taking over the Nagar Palika? If not this magnitude of a tragedy warrant suspension of the civic body then what is the State waiting for? Either you decide or we will pass orders.
Bench notes that AG has submitted that the bridge was the property of the Palika. It notes that municipality act allows State to dissolve a civic body in case of abuse of power, default etc. The catastrophe or the tragedy struck in Morbi, prima facie cannot be brushed aside...
...as not exhibiting the incompetency or default of the Nagar Palika. It is for this precise reasons, we posed a question to the State as to why it doesnt dissolve or supersede the civic body. In response, AG has submitted they are awaiting report, Bench notes.
CJ: We would not comment anything on this issue at this stage. We hope and trust proper action is taken. As regards the action against then CO of the Palika, we aren't ready to accept States, submissions. People have died, he has shown incompetence too.
Senior Advocate Rahul Mehra seeks permission to withdraw the application moved yesterday to restrain media from "leaking" cctv footage from inside the cell of jailed Delhi minister #SatyendarJain. "We will move High Court".
On Jain not getting proper food in jail: Mehra says as per his inform Jain didn't get proper food according to his religious belief last evening. They stopped nuts which were prescribed by doctors.
Rungta: It is on pendrive and my desktop translates it into braille
CJI: As a e-committee chairman it is my mission to make it accessible
Rungta: I have some inputs. a compatible software can be used whch is being used in our devices so that out put can be in braille
Rungta: voice translations cannot be used in court
CJI: Yes i will ask the head of NIC to coordinate with you in regard to this. Rahul Bajaj my law clerk, he is also working on this and we have added audio captcha to the website now.
[Demonetisation] The Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments today in a batch of pleas challenging the Central government's 2016 demonetisation that devalued ₹500 and ₹1,000 bank notes.
In its latest affidavit submitted to the top court, the Union Finance Ministry said that demonetisation was done in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India and subsequently ratified by Parliament.
Delhi court hears plea of jailed minister Satyendar Jain against Tihar jail authorities for not providing him basic food items as per his religious belief and also denying him medical check-up.
After yesterday's notice Tihar jail counsel appears and seeks 3 days time to file a response.
Jain counsel: Medical check up due for last 1 month...Situation is alarming. Food is the most basic thing we need. A person in jail doesn't lose his basic right of food. #SatyendarJain
Jain counsel: I request with folded hands to ask them for a report tomorrow. Food has been withdrawn. I'm on a religious fast. This food was provided even when he was in ED custody. Let them provide that at least. #SatyendarJain
CJI DY Chandrachud: thus a situation has arisen where several candidates have blocked seats in states and all India quota rounds leaving the meritorious students in the lurch #SupremeCourt
CJI: Additional advocate general of the state of Uttarakhand Saurabh Mishra states that state government did so to comply with the time schedule laid down by the SC on October 21 granting an extension of the schedule mentioned in Ashish Ranjan vs Union of India #SupremeCourt
Gujarat High Court is hearing a PIL seeking implementation of the nod given by the Governor for making Gujarati, an additional language of the Court Proceedings.
Bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri is hearing the matter.
Senior Adv Asim Pandya for the petitioner points out that the State Assembly had passed a resolution to this effect, which was forwarded to the Governor through thr Council of Ministers.
Pandya: It is basically the will of Indians through their chosen representatives. Ours is a democratic country and in this matter, when the Governor has passed orders, there is no role to be played by the Supreme Court or thr High Court even on administrative side.