NATO’s new Strategic Concept identifies Russia as the main security threat in Europe and brings NATO back to its roots: territorial defence in Europe.

I wrote for @nupinytt what 🇫🇮🇸🇪 NATO accession & future of Nordic security looks like in that context:
nupi.no/content/downlo…
🇫🇮🇸🇪 membership application came just at the right time: without the two new Allies, NATO would be hard pressed to deliver on the promise to “defend every inch of Allied territory at all times” in the Nordic-Baltic region. Now, we are looking at a unified strategic sphere.
While it is important to address e.g. the Southern flank Allies’ concerns about a “Nordic(-Baltic) club” within the Alliance, a certain degree of regionalisation will likely be even unavoidable, when making defence plans for the Baltic Sea and Arctic.
Finland, Sweden and Norway know the Arctic region and the particularities of winter warfare best. Hence, regional specialisation makes sense, as the Nordic-Baltic region directly neighbours Russia and needs to be able to hold its defence line - at least until other Allies arrive.
From a 🇫🇮 perspective, if in 2007 then-Defence Minister Jyri Häkämies identified Finland’s 3 main security threats to be Russia, Russia, and Russia, this year Foreign Minister Pekka Haavisto increased the number of threats to include 5 times Russia, namely:
In the current security environment, Finland will be a remarkable Ally: the 🇫🇮 Defence Forces have had a continuous focus on territorial defence even after the Cold War, when most European NATO countries adopted the expeditionary force model and scaled down their armies.
It gives Finland a headstart now that the 🇫🇮 analysis of security threats (= Russia) in the region has proven accurate. Having kept up conscription, Finland now has a reserve of 870,000 (wartime strength 280,000). Ukraine has shown that besides missiles, you also need people.
Finland has been (& is) investing in artillery and air defence, and you only need to look to 🇺🇦 to know why.

Both 🇫🇮&🇸🇪 have a whole society approach to defence (🇫🇮 “comprehensive security”, 🇸🇪 “total defence”) which will be a useful resource for NATO. We’ll be #StrongerTogether

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Minna Ålander 🌻 minna_alander@mastodon.world

Minna Ålander 🌻 minna_alander@mastodon.world Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @minna_alander

Nov 26
“America needs to realize that public opinion is shifting in many EU countries.” - an EU official said

I don’t know about Western Europe but at least in NCEE, if public opinion is shifting, then even more firmly to support Ukraine
politico.eu/article/vladim…
“Vladimir Putin is beginning to fracture the West.”

No. The West is fracturing itself, as it always does.

Europeans are not really in a position to complain. The US warned us about relying on Russian energy. We are also dependent on US-provided security.
If left to our own devices, we also wouldn’t be able (or willing ??) to support Ukraine with what it needs. The US support is worth twice the sum that WHOLE EUROPE has managed to muster up so far.

ifw-kiel.de/topics/war-aga…
Read 10 tweets
Nov 25
Last week’s missile case in Poland increased the urgency to get the Finnish and Swedish NATO membership fully ratified asap. Yesterday, V4 partners put pressure on Orbán to speed up the procedure in Hungary.

About the Turkish ratification:
It’s not simply a US call to “make 🇹🇷 ratify” as some seem to think. While the strong US backing for 🇫🇮🇸🇪 membership is crucial and 🇺🇸 has put its diplomatic weight behind it, it’s nevertheless not that straightforward. Contrary to popular belief, NATO is not just a US tool.
Some reminders:

Opposition from the US and other Allies did not stop Turkey from buying Russian S-400 missile systems.

And in Syria, the US and Turkey are basically on opposite sides.

washingtonpost.com/world/2022/11/…
Read 5 tweets
Nov 24
“In Finland and Sweden, the militaries know a thing or two about extreme cold weather combat, and how to battle the elements. And with an eye on the weather, the two Nordic nations have announced their biggest packages of military aid for Ukraine to date.”
euronews.com/2022/11/23/fin…
“The tenth - and latest - Finnish defence package is valued at €55.6 million, bringing the combined value of all defence material earmarked for Ukraine to €160.4m since the start of the war.”
“While some countries have been more open about what weapons systems they've given to Ukraine, the Finns see no need to flag to the Russians what they're supplying.

"It is the Finnish way to keep quiet," said [DefMin] Kaikkonen.”
Read 8 tweets
Nov 23
Can we please agree to stop talking about “NATO expansion”. It’s not NATO that is somehow actively expanding on its own initiative. It’s countries applying for membership.

Enlargement yes, but not expansion.
P.S. I just find it interesting how in the context of the EU, it’s always about “enlargement”. “EU expansion” even sounds a bit ridiculous.

But in the context of NATO, “expansion” is quite commonly used (because NATO can be imagined to expand kind of aggressively ? Idk)
P.P.S. Not a native English speaker
Read 4 tweets
Nov 22
Had the pleasure to visit 🇫🇷 FS Chevalier Paul today while it stayed at the port of Helsinki before attending the multinational exercise “Freezing winds 22” (a very accurate name) with 8 participating nations, the main exercise of @Navyfi this year.

merivoimat.fi/en/-/finnish-n…
What impressed me - apart from the anti-air and anti-submarine capabilities - was what a crew member said:

The NATO membership of Finland and Sweden only makes procedures simpler. But the French commitment to its EU partners’ security was already strong before.
While the ship stayed close to Kaliningrad in the southern Baltic Sea on its way up north, Russian planes flew over it very close to check it out. It’s an important deterrence signal that NATO partners are actively participating in exercises and showing presence in the Baltic Sea
Read 4 tweets
Nov 20
Some thoughts about Milley doubling down on negotiations: I get it that from a military logic it’s correct - you want to negotiate when you’re in a stronger position. But it also implies that some kind of territorial compromise should be acceptable for 🇺🇦

politico.com/news/2022/11/1…
What it ignores is the political element of Russia hardly negotiating in good faith at this point. It would be very convenient for Russia to use the winter for “negotiating”, while at the same time preparing for the spring, then coming at Ukraine with all they’ve got again.
Of course it’s understandable to want to avoid a long war. But negotiating now is most likely not the way to do it and would yield the opposite result: enabling Russia to get its act together and *continue* the war.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(