tern Profile picture
Nov 28 25 tweets 7 min read
Have you ever seen a mixing desk?
At first glance, they are absolutely bewildering.
But if you think they're complicated, then you're probably not going to be able to get your head round the complexity of the processes of the human body.
The honest truth that very few doctors will tell you is that there's just no way any one human can understand all this stuff.
(the human body and its processes, that is, not a mixing desk. It's possible to understand a mixing desk)
The way modern medicine works is that you get generalists who have a good grip of the basics of a lot of areas.
Doctors who work in general practice or accident and emergency need to be able to receive people with a range of issues.
A generalist might have an interest in a more specialised area like oncology, the huge subject of cancer.
Or a generalist might have an interest in a specialism within oncology like diagnosis of melanoma along with their general expertise.
But mostly generalists have a solid and practical but basic knowledge of a large number of areas, that they use to refer people to specialists.
Specialists don't have to generalise.
Yes, they have studied the basics of everything, but they focus on a discipline, like surgery or neurology or oncology.
Then within that discipline you will get super-specialists, like surgeons who specialise in brain operations.
Or oncologists who specialise in lymphoma.
And then there's still more to learn so you get hyper-specialists who devote all of their study to one aspect of an aspect of a discipline like an oncologist who specialises in lymphoma and then specialises further in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
The person who hyper-specialises there may know nothing about here, except that it exists, far off in a distant wing of the hospital or academia.
And you get people who specialise in diagnosis.
People who specialise in treatment.
People who specialise in research.
No one, no one, has a full grasp of all this.
Sometimes a hyper-specialist here will understand that this discipline massively influences that one.
But very often the different disciplines are oblivious to each other or competing with each other for funding or blaming each other or passing people off to each other.
And when it comes to something like #MECFS or Long Covid, the people who are sick find that they are passed from this person
To this person
To this person
Back to this person
When the problem is in this area
And it's because SARS-CoV-2 can cause damage to absolutely every part of the complex human system.
And the doctors are trying to treat the damage, when you need to deal with the cause.
If your house has termites, you don't deal with it by going round the building putting wood filler in each individual hole.
How are we going to solve the problem?

I don't know.
But maybe a good starting point would be to admit the complexity of this and that no one person can grasp it...
... while also realising that it's not actually about this...
... but about this:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with tern

tern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @1goodtern

Nov 30
"People refusing to catch Covid by taking precautions" can't be prolonging the pandemic.
Because they're not catching Covid.
So they're not spreading Covid.
Read 7 tweets
Nov 30
Has everyone who has had Covid become more vulnerable to infection now? Image
Lots of 'bugs' going round. Image
But honestly - what does this even mean?
What symptoms are "not related to" the damage done by SARS-CoV-2 or the body's reaction to it? Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 30
What's the endgame for minimisers and denialists?
There's no herd immunity, they were wrong about that.
There's no exit wave, they've been wrong about that each time
Read 9 tweets
Nov 29
Why are some of the people who have gone 'back to normal' so angry with people who are still being cautious?
Here's what I think's happening:
On some level, they know that they are behaving recklessly and stupidly.
They know that by their own actions they are endangering themselves.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 29
I don't use the homepage twitter feed, which I hear has gone completely bonkers.
I have switched on notifications for about three dozen excellent accounts. Image
Then when they tweet, a post appears like this in my notifications. Image
And I can scroll through what they've written. Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 29
We're in danger of abandoning science and reason, at risk of entering a new dark age of ignorance and superstition.
That may seem like a crazy thing to say, but the evidence of it is everywhere around us.
People are choosing sentiment over fact, style over substance, hope over reason.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(