This THREAD was the #LevParnasAudio from a meeting with the Trump and Trump Donors and @GOPChairwoman back around 2019.
There is an exchange between Trump and donors about #ElonMusk
The whole Thread is fascinating.
Here’s the exchange 👇🏻
This was such a good tape recorded by Parnas for the meeting. Parnas talks about Putin, Ukraine and getting rid of the Ambassador there. Also brings up the need for cannabis and banking changes. 4/
And the exchange with Trump and donors about the head guy in Ukraine (?) and the head rabbi in Israel both liking TFG. Brings up how the name Trump and the Messiah translate to the same number 424. Trump didn’t get it. Parnas says to ask Jared
I find all the comments interesting and bizarre and that all the same players get named. All. The. Time.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Posting this THREAD from Twitter about Elon Musk. Gonna point out that the news stories will start suggesting that all the layoffs had to get down b/c Silicon Valley tech is so bloated. They will tell you it’s not important. Twitter will survive (1/2)
with back ups.
The spin is FREE. The Myth continues. (2/2)
I’m so used to doing THREADS, it’s a bit different here. My point is that when the news shifts to support the narrative that Musk and layoffs and changes is all about it being necessary and it had to be done, you know what to expect moving forward. Just saying.
This whole purchase has been odd and disconcerting from the beginning. Some tweet about bankruptcy coming, but even that makes no sense. The current owner is literally burning Twitter to the ground and for what reason?
🧵 1/
A few years, Musk played games with Tesla. My THREAD spells out most of it. Generally speaking, Musk has turned to the PIF and Saudi Arabia to raise funds to take Tesla private, but it didn’t work the last time he tried.
Saudi Arabia is a denominator in the worldwide market that people have to remember is out there. Very dangerous too if they get their hands on both SOLAR and ELECTRIC technology. The other market they want? WATER and SOCIAL MEDIA. 2/
OK, for those interested, I finished my poll work service at 9PM on the dot. We were told to get done by then and we did. Here’s why it worked for us working the polls in Shasta County:
🧵 1/
#1 we had enthusiasm going into this mid-term election from volunteers. 400 people volunteered and we had an average of 4 people per voting precinct. That is huge and I hope when 2024 comes around, we have the same enthusiasm. Poll workers make a difference
2/
I don’t have any stats but from what I saw during my training, it was definitely 1st time poll workers showing up to do the work alongside those with experience. I saw 2 people that were R deniers in 2020 and I told them to work and learn how elections were fair in CA. 3/
As Tuesday approaches and I begin prepping for my volunteer duty as an Inspector at a new voting precinct, I have to be honest.
I’m also a bit nervous.
🧵
1/
I posted some earlier tweets related to how many people have signed up to do poll work. In Shasta County, for this election, it was 400 volunteers. They are from all walks of life and the # in my training workshop was 50/50 (Senior/Younger).
That’s a good sign.
2/
When we do this volunteer work, we do it because you either love doing the work, want to learn more from it or you want to be sure that the work is being done is right.
No matter the choice, it’s a long day 6AM to 10PM or later.
3/
A 🧵about Social Security 1/ In 1974 (one year after I graduated from high school), Charles Koch founded the CATO Institute. It was a think tank of all think tanks which was focused on dismantling America’s social safety net.
In an article from The Nation in 2011, Charles Koch privately championed Social Security to Fredrich Hayek, an author he wanted to come to the U.S., so that he could speak and write for CATO. His hypocrisy was noted in this article.
But that’s a side story 2/
And he’s DOUBLING the subscription price to he doesn’t have to rely on so many users assuming that his projections are that people will pay more to stay verified. Frankly, that’s a tough scenario to predict with serious vetting.
Either that or all the stories about it are wrong