On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear a case, Moore v. Harper, which could decide whether Democrats will ever be permitted to win another election.
The case involves the independent state legislature theory—the crackpot notion that the Elections Clause of the Constitution permits state legislatures to wield unchecked power in the way states run their federal elections.
The Elections Clause reads, in part, “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations…”
The ISL theory is absurd and rests on an anachronistic interpretation of the term “legislature,” in the Elections Clause. The term legislature has historically referred to the entire state lawmaking apparatus, including state court rulings and governor’s vetoes.
But according to North Carolina Republicans, “legislature” means the legislative body, exclusively, such that the state courts have no power to constrain actions the legislature might take when it comes to regulating federal elections.
Although the ISL theory has been discredited by legal scholars on both sides of the aisle, there is still cause for alarm—

Four of the #FedSocSix have already expressed an openness to this theory: Roberts, Thomas, Alito, and Kavanaugh are all playing footsies with the idea.
If SCOTUS adopts this theory, it will spell disaster for democracy. State court judges could lose their power to stop partisan legislators from passing laws that undermine fair elections. Governors could lose their power to veto anti-democratic voting laws.
Ultimately, Republicans in North Carolina want to gerrymander and run unfair elections—and they are claiming that the U.S. Constitution prevents state courts from doing anything about it.
Follow along as @AngryBlackLady live-tweets the oral arguments on the @RewireNewsGroup account on Wednesday, December 7, followed by a rapid-reaction episode of #BoomLawyered.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rewire News Group

Rewire News Group Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RewireNewsGroup

Dec 7
Gorsuch was good on ICWA. He's crap on everything else.
the original public meaning of the Constitution changes and shifts depending upon what Republicans want. It's so disingenuous.

Read 28 tweets
Dec 7
What's up, nerds! @AngryBlackLady here ready to live-tweet the downfall of democracy in #MooreVHarper!

The independent state legislature theory (ISL Theory) is on deck. And it's bad.

THE ISL theory posits that state courts are without power to review state legislative action when it comes to federal elections because the Elections Clause says the legislature *exclusively* has the power to set the time, place, and manner of federal elections.

It's absurd.
It's contrary to the Constitution. It's contrary to originalism, which Thomas and Alito love to dry hump when it suits them.

And it's contrary to common friggin sense.

But common sense and the rule of law don't matter anymore so here we are.
Read 24 tweets
Dec 5
What's up nerds!

@AngryBlackLady here live-tweeting #303Creative in which an evangelical Christian wants an advisory opinion about whether making a hypothetical wedding website for a hypothetical gay couple in the future violates her 1st Amendment rights.
Thomas: Is this case ripe?

Waggonner, who is arguing for Alliance Defending Freedom on behalf of Lorie Smith/#303Creative tries to answer and fumbles around.

She's claiming Colorado is chilling her speech.

(No they're not.)
Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor are making the point that the wedding website is the invitation of the customer, not the invitation of the wedding website designer. So why is the website the speech of the website designer?

So why is it 303 Creative's message?

(It's not.)
Read 32 tweets
Dec 5
It’s been almost six months since #SCOTUS overturned #RoeVWade and the Court’s conservatives have accelerated the Christian nationalists’ project to reimagine the boundaries of our civil society, reflects @Hegemommy.

rewirenews.link/3gVwOMh
For years, Republicans have shown they are willing to sacrifice democracy when it gets in their way, and the Supreme Court is an essential component of this project of maintaining minority control at all costs, explains @KA_OConnor.

rewirenews.link/3FsqxRx
How much worse can it get? Unfortunately, the answer to that question is “a lot,” says @AngryBlackLady.

rewirenews.link/3uosMyO
Read 6 tweets
Nov 9
Deputy SG Kneedler is up for the DOJ:

He is arguing that Congress has full authority to regulate the affairs of Indians. Plenary means plenary. Why are we here.
Bottom line: Congress's actions must be rationally related to furthering the interests of Indians.

Regulating placement of children is rationally related to furthering the interests of Indians.

Let's wrap it up and go home.
Alito asks whether or not Congress could prioritize providing Native Americans with covid vaccines and why that's different.

As @Hegemommy just noted to me, the takeaway is that conservatives see Native children as a commodity. This is about a domestic supply of infants.
Read 23 tweets
Nov 9
*taps mic*

Good morning!

@AngryBlackLady here live-tweeting the arguments in #BrackeenVHaaland, the case that demonstrates there's nothing white folks won't complain about when they don't get their way. They want native children and by George, they'll have them, ICWA be damned!
The case is more than about the white supremacist urge to steal Native children from their homes and assimilate them, thereby severing their ties to their tribes.

It's also about ending tribal sovereignty. "Native American" is a political designation that means something.
But the Brackeens and the state of Texas want "Native American" to be a racial classification so they can complain that the Indian Child Welfare Act unfairly prioritizes Native American people in the placement of Native foster children.
Read 41 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(