Playing around with applying our method from doi.org/10.1177/239980… for a new project; we can use it to map, e.g., (2016) walking commutes by electoral division in #Dublin using flowmapper.org
We can also combine this with our cost-distance method (self-promotion! sciencedirect.com/science/articl…) to find the cost of traveling a given distance (based on opportunity cost of travel time, buying walking shoes, etc.) to see where walking infrastructure/service is relatively poor
From this it looks like more suburban/outlying areas (that likely have more disconnected street patterns) are relatively more costly to walk
Here are (again, 2016) public transit commuting flows in Dublin (left)...and transit flows with the largest 500 average waiting times at 09:00 on Nov. 29 (right)
These patterns (including overall cost-distance ratio here) have important implications for #equity, #sustainableLiving, and improving non-auto transportation across the region. It will also be interesting to see what changes the @CSOIreland 2022 Census results bring!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin Credit @kcredit@mapstodon.space

Kevin Credit @kcredit@mapstodon.space Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KevinCredit

Jan 15, 2021
For all interested at the development of spatially-explicit machine learning models, new paper in @GeogAnalysis develops a straightforward approach: insert spatial lags into a random forest model and test performance against spatial econometric models onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ge…
1/8
Random forest outperforms SE models across the board, and the "spatial Durbin" RF model performs best of the lot, though not by much: 84.61% accuracy vs. 84.37% non-spatial RF accuracy vs. 81.88% spatial Durbin accuracy
2/8
Paper uses a "post hoc" approach to evaluate model performance, where pre-intervention predictions generated by a given model are evaluated against the actual observed post-intervention values rather than a reserved subset of the data (although did that too)
3/8
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(