@eigenlayer is a series of smart contracts on $ETH allowing users to re-stake liquid $ETH staking derivs. It is a mechanism to leverage the existing trust network to do stuff it wasn't meant to
5/ but let me try to make a few examples so that it becomes more clear what I mean by this
6/ when interacting with protocols (e.g. a DEX on $ETH), users have to not only trust $ETH and the DEX they use, but also a number of other protocols that the DEX (or potentially the chain) interfaces with
7/ from a user perspective, this can for example mean:
- trusting oracles for price feed
- trusting bridges for cross-chain transfer
- trusting relayers for MEV Boost
- trusting a DA provider (single provider, committee or DA layer) if user is on a Validium/DAC or Celestium
8/ ok so good so far. but where does @eigenlayer enter the picture here?
well, all the above mentioned cases are examples of users having to trust a middleware service that's not secured by the $ETH validator set, outside ecosystem security & potentially a source of risk
9/ but what if instead of having the middleware secured independently, there was a way to leverage the existing trust network ($ETH validator set) to do that?
10/ sounds familiar?
"mechanism to leverage the existing trust network to do stuff it wasn't meant to"
you're right, it's exactly what @eigenlayer does (see definition earlier)
11/ through re-staking, @eigenlayer let's stakers expose their staked $ETH ($stETH or $rETH) to additional slashing conditions in exchange for securing middleware, thereby leveraging the existing $ETH validator for security/trust
12/ but why do I bring up @eigenlayer in the context of DA?
well, if you read carefully you might remember that middleware can also refer to a DA solution, for example in the case of a Validium or Celestium
13/ that means the user of the #Validium or #Celestium has to trust the centralized DA provider or decentralized DA layer's (independent) validator set to consistently ensure DA
14/ but what if instead of having to trust an external off-chain DA source or another chain, we could use the existing $ETH validator to secure a DA middleware layer?
well, I think at this point you get where I'm going with this
15/ so, let me quickly introduce you to #EigenDA, which is doing exactly what I just described. It's a DA network for rollups and allows $ETH to offload its DA within ecosystem security instead of going off-chain
however, $ETH validators can freely choose to secure middleware or not
so, to achieve high security guarantees, a middleware service has to convince a lot of $ETH validators (rewards)
17/ since #EigenDA literally only is a DA layer (even conseus stripped off), it has a much higher throughput than Celestia (1.4MB/s, source: @MessariCrypto)
#EigenDA is said to achieve up to 15MB/s, which is 176 times more than the DA rate of $ETH without #danksharding
18/ using similar technology to $ETH's danksharding implemtation to ensure DA (e.g. data availability sampling), #EigenDA is a great battle-test for danksharding before it goes live
Ready for $DYM, the next big modular play with a strong airdrop narrative (basically @CelestiaOrg 2.0) anon?
@Dymension is an ecosystem of scalable rollApps that share liquidity, secured by the Dymension Hub.
Wouldn't fade this.
🧵👇
1/ The modular season is just getting started and @CelestiaOrg has already impressively showcased the power of airdrops across a modularized tech stack as a narrative. 🧱 🪂
@Dymension will be a similar case. This is one you should watch closely. 👀
2/ Dymension is a modular rollup ecosystem. ✨
The @Dymension Hub acts as a shared settlement layer for interoperable, modular chains that rely on scalable DA layers like @CelestiaOrg.