Ever since Sandy Hook, experts have learned a lot more about how to intervene with disturbed and suicidal young men — before they get their hands on AR-15s and body armor. Threat assessment, red flag laws, higher age limits for guns. motherjones.com/crime-justice/…#SandyHook10YearsLater
2/ This pattern with assault rifles and tactical gear used in the grim spate of mass shootings in 2022 is telling. It's an escalation of a trend over the past decade. motherjones.com/crime-justice/…#SandyHook10YearsLater
4/ Marketing by gun companies has fed into the mentality of young men who become mass shooters. Threat assessment research shows how. motherjones.com/crime-justice/…
(Note on #2 above: The UVA perpetrator used a handgun but also had an AR-15 and other gear and ammo in his possession)
5/ Frankly, it is astonishing that so many politicians still stand in the way of promising solutions like red flag laws. Including in Texas—even after Uvalde. These laws are designed to do precisely what many Republicans call for after every massacre. motherjones.com/crime-justice/…
6/ But there is also plenty to be hopeful about, and much more that can be done to reduce mass shootings. Here I also detail a recent case in Seattle that shows how threat assessment and red flag laws can be used successfully to prevent a mass shooting motherjones.com/crime-justice/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is jaw-dropping and should be a much, much bigger story. How DHS had specific, highly alarming intel well in advance but failed to sound the alarm about January 6 news.yahoo.com/exclusive-an-i…
“On the morning of January 6th, 2021,” the DHS analyst wrote, “I made one more phone call begging for us to be given the intelligence reporting that we needed desperately which could have been used to inform those on the ground of the full kinetic threat"
It's not as if the intel community didn't have some sense of what was coming. Journalists paying attention sure did too. We published this story on January 6, just hours before the assault on Congress. (The social media headline here was a later update) motherjones.com/politics/2021/…
Regarding the awful attack on Paul Pelosi: it's important not to get ahead of verified facts. We know little yet about the suspect's circumstances & motive. That said, it's worth highlighting again more broadly the dangers of #StochasticTerrorism that I’ve long written about. 1/x
We’re in an era in which the Trump-dominated GOP has more openly accepted—and participated in—dangerous political incitement. It will cause further bloodshed. And let's be clear: There is little if any equivalent behavior from the Democratic Party. motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 2/x
The incitement Trump has long used—which is knowingly enabled by his GOP and Fox News allies—has had a grim effect. As I reported recently, new research shows that Americans have grown more accepting of political violence, foremost partisan Republicans motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
2/ I know many are sick of this and just want to tune him out, but many millions of Americans still back Trump—including partisan extremists who think political violence is justified. What happens when “armed citizens” patrol polling places on November 8? motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
3/ Trump’s efforts to dehumanize and breed contempt for his purported enemies increase the risk for political violence, research shows. And he has spread these tactics. Republican leaders aren't rejecting his dangerous incitement—they're now copying him motherjones.com/politics/2022/…
"12 percent of 'strong' Republicans indicated support for violence to 'return Trump to the presidency this year,' and 17 percent indicated the same to 'stop an election from being stolen.' They were also more likely to agree that 'armed citizens should patrol polling places'" 2/x
Threat assessment experts I spoke with this month told me that that they continue to see alarming levels of political extremism in threat cases, foremost driven by Trump’s rhetoric and the so-called ultra MAGA movement motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
NEW: Trump continues to escalate his dangerous incitement. My latest reporting on this disturbing pattern of behavior from the ex-president motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 1/x
Trump declares on Fox News that a top elected law enforcement official really “hates” America. At a rally, he calls the FBI “vicious monsters”—knowing a Truth Social user tried to attack FBI agents with an AR-15.
He also knows the January 6 committee is about to return to the headlines with further grim evidence of his malfeasance. As Liz Cheney just put it, Trump's rhetoric about possibly being charged represents a “direct” and “credible” threat of violence motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x
NEW: Trump has spread incitement of violence throughout the GOP. Here's my latest reporting on the growing danger from one of the ex-president’s darkest legacies motherjones.com/politics/2022/…#StochasticTerrorism
The temperature has risen ever since Trump and his allies went ballistic over the seizure of highly classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, with various GOP figures helping fuel the fire. Violence experts told me they’re deeply worried about the incitement motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 2/x
What’s so insidious about 'stochastic terrorism' is that politicians engaging in this form of rhetoric give themselves cover to deny responsibility for violence that isn't specifically predictable but that is likely to come from extremist followers motherjones.com/politics/2022/… 3/x