(Please flag any targets that have been strengthened or weakened compared to the consultations)
So a target to cut farming’s contribution to water pollution in rivers by 40% (phosphorous and nitrogen) has been pushed back a year, from 2037 and 2038. So weaker than proposed.
Interesting choice given public outcry over state of rivers and pollution.
Same one year delay for a target on water pollution from sewage works.
Tree-planting goal weakened from 17.5% of land in 2050 to 16.5% in 2050.
Tree cover, not tree-planting
Air pollution goal for 2040 remains unchanged, and is twice the WHO’s new recommended guideline for PM2.5
Frank Kelly of Imperial College London tells me the target is “ridiculous” and should have been brought forward to 2030.
Early reaction coming in is negative.
Charles Watson, @RiverActionUK Chairman said: “We are appalled at the Government’s lack of ambition for our rivers. This not just morally wrong but also a political misstep given the public outcry about the state of our rivers.”
Tiny clarification on the two water targets. The shift from 2037 to 2038 is due to the Environment Act targets being published month and a half late. Not an intent to “water them down”. But the result is the same, a later target date…
England’s post-Brexit green watchdog, the OEP, welcomes the new targets but says “the delay was deeply regrettable given that urgent action is needed to protect and improve the environment.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If fracking "will only be allowed to take place when local communities agree to it", as reported, very little fracking will happen. Public atttidudes massively swung against it over the past decade - the more exploration progressed, the more it was opposed assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Also big outstanding question of whether any companies have an appetite for fracking exploration (let alone production) in England.
Permissions for fracking have expired (e.g. for Cuadrilla), and sites have been mothballed.
Previous big players were Cuadrilla, Ineos and iGas.
Will be fascinating to see the BGS review of the scientific evidence of shale gas, if it's published today as expected.
It's unlikely there's any new evidence from UK, e.g. on seismicity limits, because obv there's been no fracking here due to ban. Should all be international.
The UK's independent climate advisers, @theCCCuk, have a 600-page report out today on progress towards #netzero. It's packed with important findings — here are seven of them 🧵
@theCCCuk 1️⃣ The UK government doesn't have enough credible policies in place to meet its carbon targets for the mid-2030s, despite its Net Zero Strategy last October. The yellow, orange and red on this graph show the problem sectors
@theCCCuk 2️⃣ In fact, credible plans exist for only 39% of the emissions reductions needed to meet the mid-2030s target, known as the 6th carbon budget. A lot of that comes from a mandate on car makers for how many electric cars they must sell, and renewable electricity support ☀️
.@HenryDimbleby says biggest miss from the UK gov’s food strategy was the lack of different tariffs to hit beef imports that are environmentally harmful (eg from Amazon). Says other miss was the lack of putting targets & reporting in statute. Says it doesn’t amount to a strategy
.@lorddeben of the @theCCCuk is highly critical of the food strategy. “I don’t think it’s a strategy at all. It’s a collection of hopes, wishes and desires… to call it underwhelming is to dignify it”
.@Minette_Batters says she’s “slightly worried” about backing for huge glasshouses to grow fruit and veg in food strategy but says it has good commitments on food security and self-sufficiency. Speaking at Fir Farm Conference in Gloucs today
The UK govt has ended electric car grants. Effectively argues it's no longer needed: "Successive reductions in the size of the grant, and the number of models it covers, have had little effect on rapidly accelerating sales" gov.uk/government/new…
New electric car sales are on meteoric upwards trajectory (newscientist.com/article/226426…). But in terms of optics this is still an odd move just 6 months after COP26, where "cars" [as in greener ones] were one of the UK govt's four top priorities (cash, cars, coal, trees)
Electric Vehicle Association: "We are disappointed by the removal of the grant, in a move that comes before EVs reach price parity with ICE [petrol and diesel] vehicles, widely expected to happen in the next few years."
UK energy strategy is out. Heavy on targets, light on new money/policy. 1) 50GW offshore wind target by 2030, up on prev 30GW goal & 10GW today 2) £120m for new nuclear (Hinkley is £23bn so £120m is small) 3) 10GW hydrogen target by 2030, up on old 5GW goal
More on next tweet...
UK energy strategy continued: 4) solar power: "looking to increase" it but no new money or support yet, consulting on plans 5) onshore wind power: no extra support or lifting of planning veto but consulting on community partnerships 6) New oil and gas licensing round in autumn
There is good stuff in the energy strategy. But on first blush it doesn't look like a "major acceleration" of homegrown energy as billed. Lack of enough new concrete measures: e.g. failed to lift caps on renewable auctions this year (CfD), flunked opening up onshore wind/solar.
NEW: IPCC report on climate mitigation is out. How to stay under 1.5°C?
🌡️Global emissions peak by 2025 (v.hard)
⛏️Coal use drops 90% by 2050 (huge)
Happily...
☀️Cost of solar has fallen 85%
🔌Electric car roll-out up x100
🥩Diet shifts can make big cuts newscientist.com/article/2314731
.@antonioguterres on the new IPCC climate report and the response to the war in Ukraine: "increasing fossil fuel production will only make matters worse. Choices made by countries now will make or break the commitment to 1.5°C."
"We need to end the age of fossil fuels," says IPCC author Jan Christoph Minx. A key fact from the IPCC report: unchecked, the world's existing fossil fuel infrastructure would release 600bn tonnes of CO2, blowing the 500bn tonne "carbon budget" for 1.5°C newscientist.com/article/231473…