Someone asked me yesterday if the discovery nuclear fusion will mean we won't need degrowth anymore.
On the contrary, I think it underlines why degrowth is so important.
These 4 graphs show why.
The short of it is, even if we invent a source of unlimited free energy, we are already crossing the boundaries of countless life support systems other than the carbon cycle.
In 2015, we had already crossed 3 planetary boundaries, including biodiversity.
Free energy won't solve that, we'll still need to transform and radically reduce our global material and energy use and destruction of ecosystems. In fact, it might speed it up. #degrowth #biodiversity #nuclearfusion
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Great news! Our book, The Future is Degrowth, is now available for pre-order.
I want to say a little bit here about its contents, and why I’m so excited about it.
This is the first book to directly speak to a leftist audience about degrowth. In the book, we position degrowth as a necessary alternative to neoliberalism, neo-fascism, pro-market liberalism, and leftist productivism.
There is something wrong about the way we think about waste: some thoughts I've been mulling over.
We see waste and we think that it is a shame that so much valuable stuff is going down the drain—all that squandered time, energy, and wealth.
It feels bad to know that all that good stuff is being destroyed, and our response is often to cheer any company that tries to stop it—selling ugly fruit, donating to food banks, recycling old clothes into shopping bags.
I often see people ask, “what can we give the working class that will make them like environmentalism?”
The idea is that demands for ecological reparations, climate justice, etc., just won't appeal to the working people.
Some thoughts.
Note that by working class, it is often meant the working class in industrialized countries. This group expects significant life improvements within the current system.
So working class environmentalism must involve transforming the current system to meet working class expectations in industrialized countries (e.g. full employment while largely automating undesirable work such as farming and household tasks).
A lot of people know Nobel Prize-winning economist Elinor Ostrom from her work on the commons.
But many might not know that some of her first research in the 1970s on policing.
It can inform the reform vs. defunding debate, with some clear empirical findings.
In 1970, Ostrom was a young professor at Indiana University. At the time, city governments were pushing to centralize their services, including police forces. They assumed that the more centralized the police force, the more funding they got, the less crime there would be.
To test this, Ostrom worked with the Indianapolis government and her students to measure the quality of policing. Surprisingly, against common assumptions, they found that the smaller the police force, the more positively residents evaluated the police services they got.