Thread by @chrismartenson

1. Here's what we're up against. Vitamin D is the biggest, most glaringly obvious 'tell' that health authorities were out to cause public harm. They never once pushed VitD. As of this morning, it's *still* not recommended for Covid. #pfizer #CDC #DiedUnexpectedly

2. The issue is that there are dozens of studies saying Vitamin D helps...a LOT. And it's as close to completely safe an intervention as you could want. From a potential risk-benefit standpoint, it is a medical and public health no-brainer. But they didn't do this. Why not?

3. Actually, it's worse than that. The failure to promote VitD goes back many, many years. And it has a strong racial component because melanistic skin tones in northern latitudes lead to much less natural VitD.

4. A whole host of related metabolic syndromes would disappear if Vitamin D levels were adequate across the population. Obesity, diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance ... For some odd reason, for many years NIH/NIAID/CDC have all declined to promote VitD
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

5. The only conclusion is that they didn't do this because healthy people are bad for their revolving-door business arrangements with pharma companies. So now we're down to it. The inescapable idea that pharma companies are trying to make you ill to sell you more products.

6. What kind of people would do that?

How is this different from a death cult?

This is why you have to pick a side. You are either on the side of truth, beauty, health, vigor freedom, curiosity, and kindness, or you stand for their opposites. This is the actual battle.

7. The Peak Prosperity community has been diving into this deeply of late.
peakprosperity.com/the-truth-abou…