"..Obligation of Thrippadidanam is inherited by this Hon’ble Court & it is how picture of Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana in Original Constitution Part III page is to be understood...Art 26 is Antaratma of our Constitution which governs outcome as per emblem यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः"
...of such matters brought before this Hon’ble Court when read with the obligation of Thrippadidanam inherited by this Hon’ble Court and of the Oath taken by Hon’ble Judges and meaning of GOD explained by Dr Ambedkar.."
The affidavit ends with the important advise of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity in Koorma form which is part of Art 363 dispute papers already filed in previous additional affidavit.
The key messages in the above important affidavit to Hon'ble SC Judges almost three years after Feb 10th 2020 rejection of Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity, Shirur Mutt & Thanthri Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple on same day..
Which gave raise to Art 363 #Kantara dispute and finally culminated in above affidavit summarizing the resolution of dispute captured in a single frame 👇
Hope Hon'ble SC Judges in their winter vacation time watch #Kantara movie it will enable them to grasp the essence of the message conveyed in the affidavit easily
Also suggest visit to Shri Padmanabha Swamy temple to Hon'ble SC Judges especially during evening Deeparadhana time the key significance of why Deeparadhana is first performed to Shri Rama, Seetadevi and Lakshmana sannidhi before it is performed to main Deity illuminates message
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In👇thread we explain how April 18th 2019 Sabarimala genuine promise blocked by officials 90% fulfilled by Shri Rama Om Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏 Himself...the defined promise for devout politicians for rest 10% work is same as Art 84(A) Constitutional Oath
Unfulfilled 10% Sabarimala promise is spirit of above Art 84 (A) Oath for all devout politicians across political spectrum who belong to Shri Rama Parivar Art 26 धार्मिक सम्प्रदाय (Hindi version of Constitution) Ramayana defn "राज्यं च वयं च रामस्य धर्मं वक्तुमिहार्हसि"
"If elected by grace of Shri Rama I will preserve protect and defend Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma definition of Constitutional Morality (Dharma) and ensure Sabarimala is reheard and correct Hon'ble SC Judges definition"
It is only through true faith and allegiance to Constitutional Morality (Dharma) definition of Shri Rama Embodiment of Dharma as against wrong definition in SC ZERO Deity Rights judgement that Sovereignty and Integrity of Bharat can be secured
We have always wondered what is the significance of July 18th in the draft notification to resolve Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute...
Indian Independence Act came into force on July 18th 1947 and it is now clear the SC violated legal limit
Eka Shila Shri Chilkur Balaji SreeDevi Bhoomi Devi Swamyambhu Deity represents the natural Rama Rajya Sovereignty of Dharma right of this ancient sacred land worshipped in the form of Bhoomi Devi Deity and recognized as 👆 legal limit to Constituent Power of law making
Shri Thanthri Padmanabha Swamy temple explains the connection between Thrippadidanam and above legal limit to Constituent power of law making
Post Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathishta
Shri Ramlala Sarkar Art 26 & Art 363 Deity rights legal limit to Constituent Power of law making protects
Sabarimala Deity Right to be Worshipped inclusive of Devotees' Group Right to perform duty of worship & please Deity
HH Saantananda Maharshi Swamiji historic letter connects April 18th 2019 Sabarimala promise of Hon'ble PM Shri @narendramodi ji and Jan 22 2024 Constitutional Pranaprathisha which fulfills it by grace of Guru even though wrong official opinion blocked it.
How Shri Rama Raja Deity of Orchha revealed Himself as Ruler u Art 363 (2)(b) when historic Digvijay yatra of Swamiji referred to in the above letter which started from Ayodhya turned back towards Ayodhya
Bharat : India 2.0 Art 26 interpretation (we hope to get SC to follow through Order 27A Rule 1) that protects Rama Rajya natural right of Bhumi Devi has been secured through devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal (SC) community to which Milind Makwana belongs americankahani.com/perspectives/i…
"Our neighbors included a priest& Vedic astrologer. While both were members of what some would deem India’s “upper” or “dominant” castes, we were all in same socio-economic boat We didn’t think of them as superior nor did they think of us as inferior" Thank you for speaking truth twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
We are proud of devotion of Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community without which Bharat would have lost Art 26 Rama Rajya protected in Deity Rights and we hope the Govt will respond to our request to honor Tiruppan Alwar Ammal community through Bharat Ratna for Hon'ble former President
Having installed Sengol in Parliament let us work to make it erect for well-being of our Nation by correcting the wrong Sabarimala interpretation that Deity is not a person u Part III which is in violation of Rama Rajya pious purpose that Sengol represents
"Shri Parameshwarji Eklingji Maharaj is the Sovereign of Mewar, and Shriji as His sole representative shall exercise on His behalf all rights, authority & jurisdiction." From Mewar Constitution
Sovereignty of Dharma basic structure of Bharat Constitution
"Dharma, righteousness, is king of kings Dharmam Kshatrasya Kshatram It is ruler of both people & the Rulers themselves It is sovereignty of the law which we have asserted" Dr Radhakrishnan defining Bharat's Objectives resolution when we comp with Pakistan 👆
Shri Chilkur Balaji Deity Koorma Form July 18th SC Judgement quotation part of Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute
"In adharma flowing frm wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges& the ruler"
The #SengolAtParliament reminds us of the practical truth of above statement from the story of Kannagi
The Hon'ble President and Hon'ble MPs who constitute Parliament cannot thus be powerless when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute is raised to correct through Art 143 ref
Sengol in Parliament does bend when SC violates dharma by infringing on Rama Rajya pious purpose protected in Shri Rama Raja Deity Rights in our Constitutional Rama Rajya and when Art 363 Constitutional Rama Rajya dispute arises duty of Hon'ble President & Hon'ble MPs to correct