Dan Hensley Profile picture
Dec 18, 2022 37 tweets 13 min read Read on X
***The Great Twitter Aircraft Tracking Thread***

The current owner of Twitter, @elonmusk has generated public panic over the recent days on the topic of reception of radio signals, and has spread unsupported/unproven talking points that are dangerous to democracy.
This thread will incorporate a previous thread I wrote on this topic using proper legal resources while also adding further education on the topic of radio signal monitoring and the sharing of that information as a discoverable public record under federal FOIA law. #FOIA
This thread will also use and incorporate FCC laws as they pertain to the reception and sharing of radio signals.

Before I get into this, I want to lay out my credentials.

I am an experienced, retired aviation Security & Safety Officer.
My background as such means I hold training and experience in the protection of major international airports, commercial aircraft, and the passengers and crew who board and fly within those aircraft.

Such work requires the use and discovery of intelligence information.
I am also licensed by the FCC as a General Class Amateur Radio Operator. This means that I had to study for and take an exam that requires me to know about the legal and ethical use of radio signals.
Amateur Radio Operators are incorporated into our nation's emergency communications infrastructure as a last line of defense when the only communications resource left is radio. See 47 CFR Part 97.
I have been licensed for around 16 years now, and spent many years in international aviation security & safety operations.

Given the combination of my training and knowledge in these two areas, I am qualified to speak on this topic.
Further, I have been an independent journalist for a number of years who uses public records to report on criminal investigations, law enforcement misconduct, law enforcement policy, and U.S. intelligence agencies.

This is a further qualifier.
Now that my credentials, knowledge and experience have been successfully established, I can write this thread.
I'll go so far as to invite the #AvGeek community to weigh-in on this thread and act as fact checkers. Within that community are experts such as @AirlineFlyer, @petchmo, and @jonostrower.

If I am wrong or heading in the wrong direction, I am sure these gentlemen will correct me
The first thing we need to establish is what flight tracking is and is not. When an aircraft is registered with the FAA, that aircraft is assigned a registration number called a "tail number".
The FAA registration, "Tail Number" is known as a N-Number" and is a matter of public record. N-numbers or tail numbers are mandated by federal law as a condition for certain aircraft to fly in U.S. airspace legally.

You can see this resource:

registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquir…
When an aircraft is on he ground and ready to taxi, the aircraft uses technologies called ADS-B, and MLAT

ADS-B FAA Resource:
faa.gov/air_traffic/te…

MLAT Resource: (This links to a blog entry by a well-established business, not to flight tracking)
blog.flightaware.com/what-is-mlat
Further education about ADS-B can be found here:

Traffic Information Services – Broadcast (TIS-B)
faa.gov/air_traffic/te…

Flight Information Services – Broadcast (FIS-B)

faa.gov/air_traffic/te…
How TIS-B Works Image
How FIS-B Works (this is not usually something aviation hobbyists or journalists use, but still part of ADS-B) Image
There is also ADS-R

faa.gov/air_traffic/te… ImageImage
Something else hobbyists and journalists monitor is called ACARS (Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System)

The protocol was designed by ARINC and deployed in 1978, using the Telex format. More ACARS radio stations were added subsequently by SITA.
SITA is an air transport communications and information technology founded in 1949.

See: sita.aero

and see:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SITA_(com… Image
What you need to know is that the owners and operators of non-commercial private aircraft can ask for something called a PIA. Privacy ICAO aircraft address (PIA).

Think of PIA almost like a VPN for aircraft, only your PIA can be discovered using FOIA.

faa.gov/air_traffic/te… ImageImageImageImage
Here's where we get into the legality of flight data.

ALL aircraft registration and flight data is a public record, and IS NOT the same as personally identifiable information (PII), as it is tied to an inatimate object (aircraft), not a person.
Because the FAA places the N-Number registry online (linked to earlier in this thread), and the N-Number is REQUIRED to fly legally in U.S. airspace, plus ADS-B and MLAT are data records kept by the FAA, and the FAA is a federal agency, those records are discoverable by FOIA
The voice communications frequencies of aircraft are also published publicly by the FAA AND the FCC, and governed by both federal agencies.

See the public listing at Radio Reference:

wiki.radioreference.com/index.php/Find…
FCC AIrcraft Stations Resource combined with a screenshot from the above Radio Reference link:

fcc.gov/aircraft-stati… ImageImage
FCC Aircraft Ground Stations Resource:

fcc.gov/wireless/burea… ImageImage
FCC Frequency Assignment Databases

The FCC places both LICENSING AND Radio Frequency Assignments online for the public to see.

Why?

Because they are complying with the Freedom of Information Act

fcc.gov/fcc-frequency-…
Here's the FCC Aircraft License Search

wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSear…
Using the FCC ULS Database, any person can find and share FCC license and radio frequency assignment data. Even MY license can be found here, which ties me to an address where the FCC can reach me, even if it means using a PO Box.

wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSear…
Here's the FCC ULS search result for American Airlines Image
I said I was going to incorporate a thread I wrote on this topic. Here's where we get into the fact that the lawful possession and publishing of federal or even state records is not a crime, and not what you would call "Doxxing"

Here's where we learn that the federal government, not the state, governs the right under both federal FOIA law and under the 1st Amendment to seek out and publicly share a lawfully obtained public record.

No case law and no statute prevents this
Can aircraft be exempted under federal FOIA?

Answer: Only federal government aircraft falls under ANY of the NINE FOIA exemptions, and only when there is a national security reason for doing so.
There are several ways in the end to track aircraft:

1. Flight Tracking sites

2. Airline websites

3. FAA and FCC online resources

4. Use of a radio receiver/transceiver (anyone can buy, own, and use one) You just can't transmit unless authorized by law (license)
When it comes to using radio and an antenna to monitor (track) aircraft, you can also buy an inexpensive SDR thumbdrive (dongle) that plugs into a USB port on a phone, tablet, or computer, and with SDR software, you can see and hear radio traffic across the entire radio spectrum
SDR ADS-B monitoring resource

rtl-sdr.com/adsb-aircraft-…
You can also tune-in online by going to atc.net

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Hensley

Dan Hensley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IAmDanHensley

Dec 16, 2022
@pacificpulse24 @OGMarsLife @elonmusk @RAMansour @KeithOlbermann You've raised two specific questions here:

1. Should the FAA be publishing flight information?

2. Does the federal Freedom of Information Act fail the effects act of the Constitution?

In #2 we are assuming you are talking about the 4th amendment right to privacy
@pacificpulse24 @OGMarsLife @elonmusk @RAMansour @KeithOlbermann The answer to #1 is, the FAA is complying with the Federal Freedom of Information Act. So, yes,m they should be publishing flight information.

There's a second part to this:

Encryption of these radio signals poses an unacceptable risk of danger to aircraft and people.
@pacificpulse24 @OGMarsLife @elonmusk @RAMansour @KeithOlbermann Encryption of an aircraft transponder (ADS-B and/or MLAT) signal would also endanger goverment transparency.

As to the effects clause, that fails on its face for the reason that aircraft information is not a personal effect, it is a federal requirement to fly.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(