Several men have asked why there is outrage about men claiming to be women (#TransWomenAreConMen ) and not women doing the same to men.
Explanation: first, it hurts all of us when we frame diverse men AND women as other than what they are.
Yes, that includes women claiming /1
/2 to be men or non-women (non-binary and other nonsense).
There is are several reasons why we must talk about it more when men do it than when women do it. And it's shocking if you don't know what those reasons are
THREAD:
3/First and foremost male people are bigger, stronger, and a rape threat to women. Throughout history women needed protections against this. Did you know that before there were public toilets for women (that they had to demand and create) women couldn't leave home without
/4 protection and/or calculating if the could do errands without having to pee. Males offend sexually and violently at much higher rates than women, and that's the reason we have female bathrooms and change rooms.
When men face bathroom incursions from women claiming to be men,
/5 it may be an invasion of men's privacy, but it does not pose a safety risk. Women who colonize men's spaces are not a physical or sexual threat and they don't do this to women or children.
/6. Sports. Women were denied their own sports and had to demand them and make them for our physiology. IF/when women colonize men's sports, it's not a safety risk, and it's rarely any kind of competitive risk. It's dangerous for for women.
/7 Some men complain that "men's spaces" were eliminated by feminists in the 80s. But women demanded access to business spaces. They didn't eliminate male bathrooms and they didn't crash your prostate cancer support group. Females need single sex spaces for nudity, healthcare,
/8 but not for employment. That's the difference.
Advocacy: many people don't know that women were neglected in medicine. We were 50+% of the population and we didn't have doctors who knew or about our needs. Feminism was created to advocate for us in matters like that. When men
/9 take over women's orgs, we no longer have advocacy for female issues. When men takeover women's organizations we lose our political autonomy to advocate for these matters. Males don't lose advocacy orgs when women colonize them, because males needs were met-they didn't have to
/10 specific orgs to fight for male medical care, male rights to vote, etc.
This brings us to an important point. women who claim to be men and non-women don't pose a threat to men, but they DO do harm to women by asserting that diverse women are non-women.
/11 To summarize, the trans lie hurts all of us. Diverse men and women are members of their sex class, not cross sex identities.
But the reason why we must complain more about the men doing it is because it has safety implications, etc.
/12 When men rape women in women's prisons, the women can get pregnant.
If women were in men's prisons, they couldn't rape them. And it they could, there wouldn't be a pregnancy risk.
These are the reasons why women need our own words, sports, spaces and activism.
Men need some
13/ single sex spaces, their own support groups, and medical care. They deserve the right to pick the sex of a nurse doing personal care -most don't seem to object to female nurses, females are not a threat, but they might.
14/ 3am here when I wrote this thread. I wandered a bit, sorry. Feel free to add reasons why it matters. Not to tell men that male colonization is harmless, but to clarify why the focus and concern is largely males colonizing women and not the other way around.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is just a reminder. If you express outrage over men breastfeeding babies and asking for tampons from 11 year olds, but you promote the narrative that the "old style" trans are safe, you have two major inconsistencies to face. 1/
2/ First, men like JYaniv are post op and remain as dangerous as fully intact trenders. The men like Blaire White have so much support in this community but retain their penises. The idea that post op TS is safer than TG is arbitrary.
3/ Second. No one will explain how we support one without the other. The GRA and other certification processes were designed to screen the "safe ones" in. But that process is now shown to be arbitrary, poorly regulated, and confuses people about when they can question these men in our spaces.
Thirdly
Non-binary is trending,
Nobody is non-binary and the claim is much more than annoying narcissism and attention seeking.
It's the gender lobby's most effective tool to recruiting people to reject their sex class and to feel they have a stake in erasing sex class in language, law and policy. It's the fast track to convincing women to abandon their political class and claim a gender identity (which is designed to erase sex class in language, law, sports, and policy.) 1/ By declaring normal
2/ non-feminine, non-masculine aesthetics (appearance styles) as making some women non-women, they/thems, the gender lobby is able to recruit any women who reject femininity to take the societal and political stand that their appearance makes them non-women. Some of these women are bribed to support the agenda of sex class erasure, some have no idea what the implications are.
But the implications are that when women or society see non-feminine women as non-women and see feminized men as women, then the link between sex class the word WOMAN are severed.
When the word woman becomes detached from it's function as being a sex class identifier,
3/ women lose more than just the word woman. They lose the right to all of the sex-specific resources linked to the word woman. WOMEN'S sports are female-specific, ...until the word woman no longer refers to females because some females have opted out and men have opted in. The same happens with women's activism which becomes a male-inclusive and male dominated and female neglecting.
By convincing women they are non-women by presentation styles,
@SariboCook Feminism is activism FOR females BY females for FEMALE issues. Male inclusive and "genderology' feminism is the patriarchial establishment rebranding itself.
Also, most of us don't hate people who thnk they are trans. we hate the 1/
@SariboCook 2/ male rebranding, colonization, and rebranding. And we hate the unnecessary medialization for profit to simulate the oppose sex. None of these ideas are
@SariboCook 3/ left wing, pro woman, pro LGB or anti patriarchy.
You've bought the lie of the establishment because it's been sold to you effectively.
And
#SignsItMustBeACult is trending.
Gender identity ideology is a cult, but not only that, a harmful cult doing damage that most people are unaware of.
Thread of Damage 1/ First, while genderologists tell you it frees people from stereotypes, it doesn't do that. Instead of arguing to break stereotypes based on one's sex, it argues to redefine yourself by stereotypes, creating new boxes, new tribalism, and dissassocaition and medicalization that goes with those boxes
2/ #SignsItMustBeACult
Recruits and indoctrinates kids using marketing tactics that had to be banned
As someone who was briefly part of the alternative queer scene and am pretty in favor of adults having weird private sexual tastes, AGP ( I dated one) still poses a problem. That's because it's more than a private kink. My experience with AGP men is that it is more than a kink 1/
it is a personality disturbance which is fueled by the hormones and arousal of kink. Again, you say, so what, we cannot criminalize narcissism or kink. We can't, but we can and should be critical of kink in the public being accepted and normalized-what I saw of MOST AGP men
2/
is tht they CANNOT keep it under control. It's not just bedroom play. And that's why it gets marched out into their public life. It's out in public because they cannot control it, and because it gives them a rush (and arousal) they don't want to. Those of us who normalize
3/
I am a leftist, but I am willing to be critical of left wing parties, establishments, and "women's" orgs that have failed women by pandering to this ideology. These are not personal attacks. We have been captured, we have tried to play along. some of us meant well, some
1
of us are influenced by other leftist policies or concerns other than defeating gender ideology.
I consider it my number one concern, because I don;t think we can fight for abortion rights, rape shelters, or other women's issues while men take our name and our funding. Some
2
people don't agree. It is a difference of opinion. But I know where I stand. I care about left wing values and polices deeply, but the defacto left wing parties now are not leftist and are failing us. I'm willing to be non-defensive about that.
3