Last week, Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis convened a panel of 'experts' to try and prove mRNA vaccines are unsafe.

We wanted to point out some key myths which illustrate how they continue to mislead people. 🧵
Many of their claims center around distorting the real side-effect of myocarditis. The first is this narrative that history has shown that this side effect is riskier for kids than the virus.

We *know* this is false. AAP data show most kids 12-17 were fully vaccinated by August.
At this point, national data showed only 543 confirmed cases of vaccine-associated myocarditis in kids. And since 0-11 year olds are at very low risk for this event, there would be a limit to its scale.

Contrast this with 170000+ reported pediatric hospitalizations from COVID.
Another set of myths involves looking at the original clinical trials to determine if vaccines "really work."

This makes no sense because (in the US) we intentionally limited harms from COVID in the trial. The reason being so that the placebo group could get the vaccine...
When you look at real-world data for hundreds of thousands of ppl—matched by age, gender and class—you find all of the most significant outcomes are FAR worse with COVID.

This is better than cherry picking small trials designed not to let people get hurt. nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NE…
Panelist Joseph Ladapo then tries to claim that vaccine harms go unreported because: "These people are dying before they get to the hospital."

That's categorically false. Studies using electronic data on outcomes (instead of voluntary reports) find no increase in arrhythmia.
Ladapo also tries to claim that autopsies show vaccine associated sudden cardiac death.

His only proof is a case report with four older patients who died of arrhythmia. While they did have subclinical myocarditis, they also had pre-existing heart disease.
Given arrhythmias are the #1 natural cause of death it's a jump to say vaccines caused this.

In fact, a Nature study following 17 million doses showed the Pfizer vaccine did NOT cause arrhythmias.

COVID, however, increased the risk three to five fold. nature.com/articles/s4159…
This study did show a slight increase following Moderna's vaccine (with a much smaller sample), but this was based on 48 events and the confidence interval included no increase in risk. So the evidence is insufficient.

Meaning—at worst—Ladapo should just opt to recommend Pfizer.
Instead, he claims that the COVID vaccine has been shown to increase "cardiac mortality" in young men.

This isn't true. In fact, we've followed these rumors for a long time and it's hard to find any clear cut cases in the US where vaccine myocarditis was fatal...
That's not to say it hasn't ever happened (we examine some edge cases in the article below), only that if it does it's exceedingly rare.

Nonetheless, Florida's government promised to uncover some hidden harms and will keep pushing this narrative...

voicesforvaccines.org/covid-vaccines…
Well: We've been open-book about this all along, even interviewing doctors who treat both COVID and the vaccine myocarditis.

We'll tell you if some evidence proves otherwise, but right now the data clearly say that vaccination is the right choice.

#GetVaccinated 🩹
For broader perspective, Florida's Health Department got the data on kid's vaccines wrong nine months ago.

We've addressed their claims before even if they want you to think no one is talking about them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Voices for Vaccines

Voices for Vaccines Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Voices4Vaccines

Jul 28
Today is #WorldHepatitisDay2022! To honor it let's talk about Hepatitis B.

The Hep B vaccine is now given at birth, but starting *this year* all adults <60 are recommended to get it.

I talked to the CDC's former viral hepatitis lead Dr. John Ward to understand why 🧵
First, what is viral hepatitis?

Viral hepatitis comprises a few different infections caused by viruses Hepatitis A, B, C, D and E. While A and E mostly cause acute disease, the others including B often lead to chronic infection.

HepB in particular is a lifelong infection.
HepB is harmful because chronic infection is a leading cause of liver cancer.

In the US, between 1-2 MM people have chronic HepB. Most are unaware. And while it travels through body fluids, it's so infectious that transmission can happen through casual contact. (Dr. Ward ⬇️)
Read 12 tweets
Jul 7
Since the EUA for COVID vaccines for kids under 5, there have been some high-profile misconceptions about the recommendation.

It's an issue because this virus isn't going away and newborns have a chance at immunity before infection. So here's why we recommend the vaccine (🧵)
First, authorization.

The concern here has been that the vax trials were too small to detect many severe outcomes. And so some people say we "don't know" whether vaccine works.

That's misleading. The stated basis for the EUA was what's known as immunobridging. (2)
Immunobridging is when you have a new use for an effective vaccine and want to get the dose right.

Both the Pfizer + Moderna trials showed good immune response in kids (>=1 GMTR) with high statistical confidence. This—not efficacy—is why the vaccine was unanimously approved. (3)
Read 30 tweets
Jun 10
Over the #COVID19 pandemic, many people feared 'long-term' effects of vaccines.

Those are very unlikely. But ironically, warnings about long-term effects from disease were often downplayed.

We know *for certain* that infectious diseases can cause long-term effects... A 🧵 (1) Image
I'll start by saying this: I'm not writing this to inflate the risk of infections, or so you'll avoid every disease ever.

I'm writing this because some people have taken a realistic concern about diseases and misapplied it our means to prevent them. (2)

My repeated attempts to address concerns about long-term effects from vaccines have led me to believe that people must not know what infectious diseases can do.

So in this 🧵 I will cite a variety of sources to show they are what cause such effects. (3)
Read 46 tweets
May 2
Recently, a paper in Scientific Reports began circling that suggests mRNA vaccines may have yet undetected heart risks. The authors used EMS data in Israel looking at calls for cardiovascular events.

They also draw some conclusions that go beyond their data. A 🧵 (1)
First, it should be noted that some people are saying this was published in Nature.

It wasn't. Scientific reports is a mega journal, publishing the largest # of articles in the world and specifically selects papers for their methods rather than their immediate importance. (2)
That's not a knock against the authors, because for the most part we're not looking at their methods.

So what did they do?

They looked at rates of emergency medical calls for two conditions--cardiac arrest (CA) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS)--across Israel during COVID. (3)
Read 28 tweets
Apr 21
One common objection to vaccination goes like: "I'm healthy. I'll overcome disease naturally."

People believe that because we evolved to deal with viruses, we don't need to immunize.

Turns out this isn't true. Today you face viruses a caveman would never dream of. 🧵 (1)
This thread is about a term we hear often, natural immunity 🍃

There's a certain ring to it as if getting sick is what your ancestors would have wanted.

And while it is true that we have an *amazing* immune system, the world is much, much different than it used to be. (2)
Let's start with some facts. You obviously did evolve to handle a lot of exposures throughout your life.

We know this because even your average baby--with an immature immune system--fights off millions of potential microbial threats every single day | kqed.org/stateofhealth/… (3)
Read 31 tweets
Mar 1
I reached out to Dr. Paul Offit for comment on this study. Here's what he said. (🧵/4)

1⃣ The drop in observed protection against infection is not surprising. When the 💉 was approved, 45% of kids in this age group had antibodies. Many more do now. So 💉 has a robust competitor.
2⃣ The 💉 still functions as intended. A 💉 against mucosal infection won't stop infection forever.

"I don't think it's weaker" Paul said. It should still provide long-lasting protection against severe disease (thru memory B and T cells) and beget hybrid immunity post-infection.
3⃣ A max of 8 kids in the 5-11 💉 group were hospitalized per week.

"I mean, who are these people? We don't know," said Paul. They could be kids who were at risk (e.g. immunocompromised), not quite representative of the broader population.

It's a low # to draw conclusions from.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(