🧵1/Ω
So RiotBlockchain:

➽ is apparently paying > $40,000 per $BTC
➽ turned off their brand new facility for "cold weather" (wtf? cold cools!)
➽ says it's for "safety of team" (wtf? its #bitcoinmining. $RIOT can't administer it remotely?)

Something smells.
🧵2/Ω
The price of energy in Texas as reported by ERCOT is rising.

Texas taxpayers have, in their ∞ wisdom¹, decided to pay $RIOT a bunch of money to turn off during times of peak demand.

But this shutoff was for "safety"

¹ read as "stupidity"
energyonline.com/Data/GenericDa…
🧵3/Ω
@WSJ article 2 weeks ago put the #SEC etc. filings of 22 publicly traded cryptocurrency companies through an AI tool that checks for anomalies. The vast majority were flagged as suspicious.

But $RIOT stood out most of all.
wsj.com/articles/accou…
🧵4/Ω
@WSJ article singled out @RiotBlockchain for particular scrutiny because they seem to keep screwing up the very basic task of accounting for revenue correctly.
🧵5/Ω
Remember this facility $RIOT is turning off is brand new. Massive capital costs went into getting it turned on and depreciation is running at a staggering rate.

Put together with the borderline fraudulent financials this fact pattern suggests something worse may be afoot.
🧵6/Ω
Remember from 1/Ω that in good times $RIOT is paying $14K per $BTC... JUST FOR POWER.

Adding in depreciation they are paying $40K per $BTC. That's not counting taxes, salaries, rent, capital costs for mines, or the fact that a $675mm mkt cap co. tried to pay execs $90mm/yr
🧵7/Ω
If I were a betting man I'd bet that @RiotBlockchain probably turned off their brand new facility because they can't afford to run it and are using "cold weather" and "safety of the team" as an excuse.

The problem is those excuses don't make any goddamned sense. $RIOT
🧵8/Ω
$RIOT was barely squeaking by paying $14K per bitcoin mined. Now that the price of energy is rising in that part of Texas they are probably paying more than each coin is worth *just for energy*.

So they turned off... and then possibly lied? sus.
cc @DoombergT @librehash
🧵9/Ω
For anyone who thought that $RIOT needed to turn off because the ERCOT grid was under strain: it's not and it wasn't at any point. But it is pretty expsensive out there right now...
ercot.com/gridmktinfo/da…
cc: @bardicworks @NachshonPeleg
h/t: @CCofNavarro

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ⚯ M Cryptadamus ⚯ | @cryptadamist@universeodon.com

⚯ M Cryptadamus ⚯ | @cryptadamist@universeodon.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Cryptadamist

Nov 2, 2023
🧵1/Ω
It’s that time again. Gather round, children, for a thread about the closing arguments in the trial of Sam Bankman-Fried. #FTXTrial #FTXScam

Ω👇Ω Image
🧵2/Ω
The govt’s case revolves around a few things but fundamentally it’s about risks that were not disclosed to customers/investors.

According to the govt not only were these risks not disclosed SBF took steps to conceal them. Which is, you know, a crime

Text from my 📌 twt 👇 Image
🧵3/Ω
It’s conceded by everyone including SBF himself that there were undisclosed risks so the question becomes one of intent. The govt’s argument is that the many steps taken to conceal the risks reveal ill intent. SBF's argument is basically "being irresponsible is not illegal"
Read 42 tweets
Oct 30, 2023
🧵1/Ω
Thoughts from SBF’s 2nd day of cross examination:

Today went very, very badly for Mr. Bankman-Fried but it was still kind of a shame the jury didn’t get to witness the absolute train wreck of his first attempt especially this part:
🧵2/Ω
Things got off to a rough start when SBF tried to say that the million and one times he claimed that Alameda was just like any other FTX customer in every way he secretly was communicating that “every way” meant “one way”: Alameda didn’t front run FTX's customers.
🧵3/Ω
Cue AUSA bringing up approximately a bazillion tweets, emails, slack messages, etc. where SBF said Alameda was just like any other customer followed by the question “does it say ‘in terms of frontrunning customers’ here?”
Read 48 tweets
Oct 26, 2023
🧵1/Ω
Thoughts about SBF’s testimony today:

1. I never imagined it would be so grimly satisfying to watch a man hang himself before my eyes. The only disappointing part was that today wasn’t in front of the jury.
🧵2/Ω
SBF’s “my view from the perspective of the data I had available to me at the time” and “I’ll try to answer the question I think yr asking”¹ schtick did not play well with the judge.

¹ he actually said this, after which the prosecutor said “you didn’t answer my question".
🧵3/Ω
His testimony today was about whether he would be able to use the “but my lawyer said it was OK” defense in front of the jury. Let me summarize how it went:
Read 29 tweets
Oct 11, 2023
🧵1/Ω
Things I Learned From Caroline Ellison's Testimony That CoinDesk Has Declined to Mention, a Thread:

1. The billion dollars that SBF had to bribe Chinese officials to give back was held on Huobi and OKX.
🧵2/Ω
That bribe was for $150 million.
🧵3/Ω
Multiple people at FTX/Alameda had family ties to the Chinese government. One of those people thought the bribe was a bad idea and quit shortly thereafter. The other one was the guy who suggested the bribe.
Read 28 tweets
Sep 19, 2023
🚨Ω🚨
Pumping my bags: another issue of #TheCryptocalypseChronicles is out on The Blogging Site That Shall Not Be Named concerning the actions of one #AxosFinancial AKA "#Binance's new US bank".

Link in bio because Elmo is pathetic and demonetizes links to That Other Site. $AX Image
🧵2/Ω
Perhaps unsurprisingly Axos Financial / $AX appears in the list of #FTX creditors. Image
🧵3/Ω
Also looks like the infamous #ReggieFowler, Crypto Capital Corp's main money launderer, invested $1.3 million with $AX according to court documents filed by #Tether / #Bitfinex begging for their money back.

Also $5 million to something related to Wacky Cathie's $ARKK? lol. Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 6, 2023
🧐 Just stumbled on this "FIAT INTEGRATION AND REVOLVING LOAN AGREEMENT DATED 10/16/2020" from #iFinex in the list of #FTX's assets from a few days ago.

"What's iFinex?" you may ask?

It's Tether.

Image
🧵2/Ω
If you think through what that means... given that it appears in the FTX list of assets it appears that Tether had an open line of credit where they could borrow money from FTX?

1. What assets were they borrowing?
2. Why does a stablecoin issuer need to borrow anything?
🧵3/Ω
This might explain it... (h/t @ParrotCapital)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(