Why Maligned and Defamed? Scripture older than 200 BC which is orated in chaste Sanskrit following truthful impeccability of Panini “Asthadhyayi “ should have been matter of splendid inheritance and pride of intellectual competence for any civilization.
@THinduz
@THinduz
Yet, the discourse around Manu Smriti is based on rejection and repudiation on some fallacious imagination. Narratives have been manufactured about its anti-women right and anti-weaker Caste right. How it all started and who conspired to take it forward?
A painful yet factual truth which exists and the masses do not know is that we do not have an original copy of Manu Smriti today in our library. Infact we have today more than 50 manuscripts of Manu Smriti today and each claiming to be original and oldest.
in Fact the Manu Smriti, the one that Ambedkar burnt on 25th Dec 1927 was also not original rather a mistranslated version. Who translated Manu Smriti?
And what was the source of this translation? It is never revealed objectively to the vast audience just to fuel the controversy and malign the cultural heritage of India.
William Jones in 1794 an English Judge in Kolkata used his choice and imagination to translate this Great Scripture written in chaste Panini Sanskrit. Was he a Sanskrit scholar? No and he himself never claimed so. Thereafter two more British clerks William Hunter and Max Muller
Who are decorated orientalists choose their words, sentences and imagination to create English translation of Manu Smriti.
Both never read Panini Grammar Ashtadhyayi. William Jones, Max Muller and Hunter had a common objective to manufacture a divisive narrative and fuel hatred
Both never read Panini Grammar Ashtadhyayi. William Jones, Max Muller and Hunter had a common objective to manufacture a divisive narrative and fuel hatred
In a section of Sanatan society. And they were able to plant the seed successfully. They were missionaries on mission to discredit any religious value and heritage other than their own. Worldwide,
The communist and left leaning fake intellectuals have demeaned every tradition which has impeded their theory of class struggle.
Hence, endless reams of paper were conspired and printed denouncing specially two aspect of Manu Smriti to the masses and especially
Hence, endless reams of paper were conspired and printed denouncing specially two aspect of Manu Smriti to the masses and especially
To the impressionable young generation. Unjustified Female rights and against the scientific idea of feminism. Inequality among the caste and suppression of Dalit Right.There are series of Shlokas written in those inherited Sanskrit Manu Smriti which stands for the rights,
Liberties and freedom of females. Critique can pick up another set of shlokas from among these sets of inherited manuscript manipulating and abusing the same spirit. Why so? Answer is, all the manuscripts in hand are not carrying the Vedic essence on which the Manu Smriti
Is based upon. Yes, with 50 original yet varied authorless manuscripts, literary incorruptibility is never guaranteed. Manu Smriti is narrated by Sage Manu and Maharishi Bhrigu on conduct of Social and moral value to be pursued by the society.
And hence it carries forward the same Vedic essence. The Rig Veda mentions some of supreme female scholar Romasha, Lopamudra, Apala, Kadru, Visvavara, Ghosha, Juhu, Vagambhrini, Paulomi, Yami, Indrani, Savitri, and Devajami. The Sama Veda adds Nodha, Akrishtabhasha,
Sikatanivavari and Gaupayana.And not to forget the great Gargi, Maitrya, they all have contributed in writing of Vedic literature without any gender prejudice, discomfort and differentiation. #manusmriti #trinetra108 #TriNetraHinduz #TriNetra #knowyourhinduscriptures
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
