@THinduz
Debunking The Fake Narrative that Raja Jaichand was a Traitor Raja Jayachandra popularly known as Jaichand, was a king of the Gahadavala dynasty, whose kingdom stretched from the borders of China to Malwa.
He ruled the Antarvedi country in the Gangetic plains, including the important cities of Kanyakubja & Varanasi.
He is also known as Jayachandra in several inscriptions and Jaichand in vernacular legends.
Raja Jaichand was the son of Vijayachandra and inherited his grandfather ,
Govindachandra's royal titles: Ashvapati Narapati Gajapati Rajatrayadhipati ("leader of three forces: the cavalry, the infantry and the elephant corps") and Vividha-vidya-vichara-vachaspati ("patron of different branches of learning").
Govindchandra was the king during whose reign his governer Anayachandra built the famous Ram temple of Ayodhya (Ram Janam Bhumi) as evident from the Vishnu Hari inscription.
Raja Jaichand ascended the throne on 21 June 1170 CE.
As a prince, Jayachandra was initiated as a worshipper of Krishna by the Vaishnavite guru Praharaja-Sharman. After ascending the throne, Jayachandra assumed the dynasty's traditional title Parama-Maheshvara ("devotee of Lord Shiva").
We are falsely led to believe the 12th-century Rajput king Jaichand was a traitor, who backstabbed Prithviraj Chauhan (Prithviraj III) in the second battle of Tarain against the invading Ghurid forces of Muhammad Ghori, in 1192 AD.
According to the fake narrative peddled by Marxists, Jaichand helped Ghori (variously referred to as Shahabuddin or Muhammad ibn Sam) to gain a foothold in India by conspiring to defeat Chauhan, his arch-rival - a baseless and a historical blunder.
No Islamic or contemporary Hindu sources tell tale of Jaichand's betrayal. If circumstantial evidence are to go by, Jaichand hated Turks.
According to the writings of Chand Bardai in his work written in 15th Century ''Prithviraj Raso'',
Jaichand was a rival of another Indian king, Prithviraj Chauhan.
His daughter Samyukta eloped with Prithviraj against his wishes, but it never accuses King Jayachandra of having invited the Ghurids to take revenge.
It is a disputed fact that Chand Bardai was a court poet,
of Prithviraj Chauhan. Many historians believe he was not contemporaneous to Prithviraj, and his epic poem is fiction since this account is historically inaccurate.
Prithviraj Raso contains a mixture of imaginary stories and historical facts, which it exaggerates for dramatic effect. The more contemporary and accurate account is the Prithviraja Vijaya written by Jayanaka who was in Jaichand's court.
Jaichand is famous in the literary world,
as the patron of Shri Harsha, who is the author of Naishadhiya Charita. Shri Harsha flourished in the court of Jaichand and composed Naishadhiya Charita, which is regarded as one of the five traditional Mahakavyas of Sanskrit literature.There is enough historical evidence in the,
form of texts, which suggests Jaichand never betrayed Prithviraj Chauhan and was a brave king who laid down his life fighting the forces of Ghori. The writings of 12th-century poet Ballabha Deo clearly reflect that Jaichand had not done anything which could be termed as treason.
The History of India by H.M. Elliot and John Dowson recounts the battle of Chandwar in Etawah district. Jaichand was killed in the battle and identified by his teeth, which were gold plated. Jaichand was a lover of Vastu Kala and popular among his subjects.'
Jaichand was the most generous king of his time. His inscriptions are filled with land grants to the priestly class. He has been described as having a powerful army to defend his kingdom [corroborated from both Persian and Indic sources].
Ibn Asir mentions that Jaichand was a powerful King in Bharat who possessed the largest territory extending from the borders of China to Malwa. The Hindu accounts (such as Vidyapati's Purusha-Pariksha ) claim that Jayachandra defeated the Ghurids multiple times.
The great king Jaichand deserves to be projected in true light and it is time the baseless blot is removed.
It is also time for people to stop using a totally unjustified and unfair label on a brave, benevolent and religious king.
Contemporary historical evidences conclusively suggest he was anything but a traitor. He himself valiantly died fighting Ghori. Jayachandra's son Harishchandra succeeded him on the Gahadavala throne.#RajaJaichand#hinduhistory#knowyourhistory#trinetra108#HinduKings
Rishi AGASTYA invented battery and modern electricity concepts
Rishi Agastya is a prominent name in the history of India and occupies a pivotal role for generating the idea of portable electricity. @THinduz
Based on principles suggested by him, the concept of portable electricity came into existence in the Indian mainland among the Hindus, while the rest of the world remained obscure from the concept altogether.
It is believed that the science of such energy was passed on from the gods to the rishis, which manifested itself in the form of numerous war weapons which have been used from time to time in all major wars in India, such as the sudarshan chakra and the brahmastra.
Why Maligned and Defamed? Scripture older than 200 BC which is orated in chaste Sanskrit following truthful impeccability of Panini “Asthadhyayi “ should have been matter of splendid inheritance and pride of intellectual competence for any civilization. @THinduz
Yet, the discourse around Manu Smriti is based on rejection and repudiation on some fallacious imagination. Narratives have been manufactured about its anti-women right and anti-weaker Caste right. How it all started and who conspired to take it forward?
A painful yet factual truth which exists and the masses do not know is that we do not have an original copy of Manu Smriti today in our library. Infact we have today more than 50 manuscripts of Manu Smriti today and each claiming to be original and oldest.
@THinduz
Understanding Manu Smriti-I: Women and Freedom
The much touted verse of misogyny in Manusmriti, actually has nothing anti-women in it.
ता रक्षति कौमारे भर्ता रक्षति यौवने ।
रक्षन्ति स्थाविरे पुत्राः न स्त्री स्वातन्त्र्यमर्हति ।। (Manu Smriti.9.3).
Almost everybody knows this verse from Manu Smriti for its misinterpreted meaning. This verse, which is often explained as denying women independence, has been touted as the ultimate proof of misogyny in Hinduism.
Yet, a thorough reading of the verse will reveal how the true import of the verse has been twisted and misinterpreted.
Let us now try to understand the true import of the verse.
First, the context.
Did you Know?
Dowry Didn't Evolve from India.
Where did We Get This Terrible Idea?
Hindus got it from the Europeans - - especially from the British occupiers where this evil practise of buying a groom/bride was being practised in Britain since time medieval times.
According to several sources, the present dowry practice in India can be traced only to the 19th century - likely because that is when Indians observed the full-fledged practice of dowry among the British in India.
Here are some excerpts from a wonderfully, enlightening book, The Marriage Bargain, Women and Dowries in European History :
"In France, the dowry was almost a universal institution, even among servants, laborers and tenant farmers, until the interwar era (1918-1939).
@THinduz
Ancient Bharat's Forgotten Scientists & Mathematicians
Pingala's Binary System
Acharya Pingala is said to have lived around 400-200 BC, maybe earlier and is believed to be the brother of the well known Sanskrit grammarian MahaRishi Pāṇini.
Acharya Pingala discovered the immense possibilities of Binary numbers quite by accident, which today are used for Computing language. He was working on the meter or Chandah of Vedas. Our Vedas were composed in meters or Chandah.
Most Indian Languages have the Deerga or long swar and the Laghu or short swar. This combination of long and short sounds is the basis of Sanskrit prosody or meter or chandah. In 200 BCE, a work called Chandahsastra was authored by Pingala, the Mathematician.
Snakes and Ladders is an ancient Indian game which was brought to the west by the British in 1892.
It was called Mokshapath meaning Path to Salvation.
In sanskrit Moksha=Salvation and Path=Path.
This game originated in ancient India and was called Mokshapath which means the path of salvation.
It was also called Param Pad Sopanam or The Highest Place.
The ultimate goal of the game was to achieve salvation by reaching the top.
Every time a person does a bad deed, he ends up at the snake’s mouth and is demoted in the game of attaining salvation.