Yet the article written by @carey_alexis has some major red flags now.
In particular "not eligible for vaccination due to his age" and "no other confirmation of any teen deaths"
So, was 616124 ANOTHER death, or did Alexis Carey and John Couani lie?
Yet according to the DAEN, there were 193 COVID vaccine adverse event reports in 12-17 year olds (who were "not eligible") between the 1st August 2021 and 10th September 2021
Accounting for the delays in reporting to the DAEN (typically 1-2 weeks) from an event the drive to vaccinated the HSC students is consistent with the adverse event reports which took off on the 26th August and peaked at 23 reports IN ONE DAY.
So, are we to believe that Tom's death was a statistical anomaly - nothing to do with the huge Qudos mass vaccination drive and a completely coincidental tragic death a week later?
In one sense it would be better if these two deaths were not the same person. Because if they were, Carey, Couani @Lalalahna and other senior reporters would have colluded to cover up a story from which other children died as a result.
And if they are not the same person, why did the TGA not declare that a 17 year old had died of myocarditis (the "viral" label is misleading - viral or drug-induced myocarditis may look the same on histopathology) within weeks of a Pfizer vaccine?
As well as these other deaths.
One last thing. The eagle-eyed of you will have noticed in the graphic (h/t @SharonC59122606) that batch FP1430 resulted in a death of a 10 year old boy reported 6th May.
The batch continued to be used and a 5 year old boy died. Reported 10th May.
Recently released Australian Road Deaths data confirm that the @epiphare study claiming that COVID vaccination reduced road deaths by 32% was, as suspected, a complete fake.
Here are the actual road deaths data plotted from the Australian BITRE data repository using a trendline for 2000-2019 (excluding 2020 as it was a quiet year)
The pink area shows the inflection and increase in road deaths over the predicted number.
Note that road deaths have a downward trend despite an increase in population (due to safety measures and slowing of traffic).
So the question becomes...
"what is the probability that - if the @epiphare study was real (showing a 32% reduction in road deaths after vaccination) - the Australian road deaths (where nearly 100% of the adult population was vaccinated) would increase by 36%"?
Debbie's tweet was about her case against @HHSGov when her son developed Type 1 Diabetes after a routine vaccine, when he had a negative glucose test prior.
So it was clearly vaccine linked, but her case was denied.
Not only was the case denied (despite clear evidence of a new diagnosis immediately after vaccination) but the case was used by the "judge" to essentially ban ANY further cases that alleged a link between new diabetes and a routine vaccine.
I'll say it again. The vaccine industry [KNOWINGLY] hijacked cell pathways that cause cancer in order to induce antibody responses so that they can claim that their product "worked" by demonstrating those antibodies - even if they offered zero protection.
To explain, when you induce an immune response you have an immune debt to pay. You can't just keep creating an immune response - or, as in the case of cancer, you will die.
A vaccine creates an artificial immune response...
Which might be fine if it was done every now and again. But what they didn't tell you was that the human body will not respond to an injected antigen alone. It will ignore it (thankfully) and the generic immune system will mop it up, no antibodies required.
Just putting this into context. @DrCatharineY was originally DOD then published on a DARPA grant. One of her few co-authors is Stephanie Petzing of the "Center for Global Health Engagement"
All one big OneHealth family to nudge you into believing this @epiphare slop is real.
For the explanation as to why these "real world data" with "data not available" publications are absolutely junk and shouldn't be accepted to any major journal please see arkmedic.info/p/pharma-hell-…
Dr Young (DARPA/DOD) is clearly now working as an ambassador to cover for the actions of the corrupt Biden regime who we are learning covered up huge amounts of adverse events from their COVID program whilst funding pharma in the "cancer moonshot"
It looks like we found our vector.
They moved from spraying live (cloned) viruses to putting them in drinking water.. which we thought wasn't possible due to chlorine.
Well, it turns out that it is, if you use a stabiliser.
The @NIH told us that they stopped funding GOFROC research but they clearly didn't.
This is a modified live virus. That is, they took a pathogenic influenza and genetically modified it and propagated it using infectious clones (reverse genetics). nature.com/articles/s4154…
"MLVs were diluted in distilled water containing Vac-Pac Plus (Best Veterinary 418 Solutions, Columbus, GA, USA) to neutralize residual chlorine and adjust the pH"