Yet the article written by @carey_alexis has some major red flags now.
In particular "not eligible for vaccination due to his age" and "no other confirmation of any teen deaths"
So, was 616124 ANOTHER death, or did Alexis Carey and John Couani lie?
Yet according to the DAEN, there were 193 COVID vaccine adverse event reports in 12-17 year olds (who were "not eligible") between the 1st August 2021 and 10th September 2021
Accounting for the delays in reporting to the DAEN (typically 1-2 weeks) from an event the drive to vaccinated the HSC students is consistent with the adverse event reports which took off on the 26th August and peaked at 23 reports IN ONE DAY.
So, are we to believe that Tom's death was a statistical anomaly - nothing to do with the huge Qudos mass vaccination drive and a completely coincidental tragic death a week later?
In one sense it would be better if these two deaths were not the same person. Because if they were, Carey, Couani @Lalalahna and other senior reporters would have colluded to cover up a story from which other children died as a result.
And if they are not the same person, why did the TGA not declare that a 17 year old had died of myocarditis (the "viral" label is misleading - viral or drug-induced myocarditis may look the same on histopathology) within weeks of a Pfizer vaccine?
As well as these other deaths.
One last thing. The eagle-eyed of you will have noticed in the graphic (h/t @SharonC59122606) that batch FP1430 resulted in a death of a 10 year old boy reported 6th May.
The batch continued to be used and a 5 year old boy died. Reported 10th May.
🚨THREAD:
The muttons descended on @MaryanneDemasi today, who I will show was correct in her report.
But first a reminder that Jon Laxton who led them is the front for the now defunct Project Halo and has never published a first author research paper on pubmed.
The claim made by the underqualified "Dr Jon" - and the muttons that descended on Dr Demasi - was that the study result was correct.
It was, in a way. But was fraudulently presented.
Here's the chart.
There were 37,909 babies given RSV monoclonals (which don't prevent death)
When assessing whether a vaccine works you can either perform a gold standard randomised controlled trial (RCT) or do a suboptimal study called a self control risk interval (SCRI) study, which is what happened here. It's recognised by the CDC.
The significance of yesterday's #Grokgate scandal cannot be understated.
Grok not only lied but lied about lying. Multiple times.
The reason it's so significant is that you are now going to enter a world of AI based medicine and it doesn't matter whether it's true or not, you better damn well take the drugs.
You see, when you lie about one thing to cover up another lie you can never be trusted in anything ever.
Grok fabricated a picture of a phone screen to show that a SpaceX rocket landing, which was fake footage, was real. That was to avoid the inevitable questions over where SpaceX money is going.
Do you want to live in a world where all your medical treatments are based on fabrications and hallucinations and the only thing that matters is that the corporations behind them keep getting paid?
Grok is that world.
Look at this picture which was fabricated by Grok earlier this year.
This is your next medical treatment. It will be as reliable as a SpaceX rocket.
What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.
@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?