Yet the article written by @carey_alexis has some major red flags now.
In particular "not eligible for vaccination due to his age" and "no other confirmation of any teen deaths"
So, was 616124 ANOTHER death, or did Alexis Carey and John Couani lie?
Yet according to the DAEN, there were 193 COVID vaccine adverse event reports in 12-17 year olds (who were "not eligible") between the 1st August 2021 and 10th September 2021
Accounting for the delays in reporting to the DAEN (typically 1-2 weeks) from an event the drive to vaccinated the HSC students is consistent with the adverse event reports which took off on the 26th August and peaked at 23 reports IN ONE DAY.
So, are we to believe that Tom's death was a statistical anomaly - nothing to do with the huge Qudos mass vaccination drive and a completely coincidental tragic death a week later?
In one sense it would be better if these two deaths were not the same person. Because if they were, Carey, Couani @Lalalahna and other senior reporters would have colluded to cover up a story from which other children died as a result.
And if they are not the same person, why did the TGA not declare that a 17 year old had died of myocarditis (the "viral" label is misleading - viral or drug-induced myocarditis may look the same on histopathology) within weeks of a Pfizer vaccine?
As well as these other deaths.
One last thing. The eagle-eyed of you will have noticed in the graphic (h/t @SharonC59122606) that batch FP1430 resulted in a death of a 10 year old boy reported 6th May.
The batch continued to be used and a 5 year old boy died. Reported 10th May.
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…
@SECGov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Wow so this company is claiming influence with 11,000 scientists and multiple links lead back to pharma and the gene therapy corporations.
Broad institute. Who could have guessed?
#pubpeergate
@Yale could be up to their necks in the biggest HIPAA scandal since @UChicago
This is how the scam appears to have worked.
Harlan Krumholz owns a patent for managing health data through an app. "Hugo health" was the middle man providing the app to bait people claiming to be vaccine injured to join a study called LISTEN. But it was essentially being run on behalf of Pfizer/Janssen who paid him $3m in "research grants".
Thousands of injured signed up but only 241 patients were used in the "study" of which the publications were irrelevant and showed nothing other than "the vaccines saved millions of lives" bla bla. Nothing helpful for the vaccine injured at all.
But the bombshell - the data that they provided was able to be sold off to anyone they wanted to. It was in the consent form that most people didn't read. The data was held on hugo.health which has now gone. It was NOT HIPAA compliant.
How did we know that hugo.health's servers were not HIPAA compliant?
Yale told the participants in a email in July 2024 (attached).
So where did all that health data go?
Was it sold off to the highest bidder or used in a blackmail campaign against vulnerable people who were vaccine injured and couldn't work? (Like those that have targeted our accounts recently)
We don't know. But you can be damn sure that Yale knows, and took secret action to remedy the situation having already taken millions of dollars from pharma to run studies that undermined the vaccine injured.
That is why there is so much animosity suddenly being directed at the vaccine injured. They want to bury this story.
Yale could be in very big trouble.
They deserve a hashtag.
#YaleGate
@Yale @UChicago For those confused, please understand what a "limited hangout" is here. While you are rejoicing on the scraps of Daily Mail fodder, the pharma companies' new narrative is enshrined by those very articles.