I'm happy to report that my most recent article (with @DeucesTecum) has been published with @DickinsonLRev.

It uses student loan complaints in the CFPB database as a proxy for customer satisfaction.

ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewconten…

#studentloans #fintech #CFPB #consumercomplaints
We created a novel data set drawn from the @CFPB's consumer complaint database. Using only student loan complaints, we found 212 companies were complained about.

We then identified which complained-about companies were fintechs.
We then compared the complaints against these fintech lenders and/or servicers to the complaints against non-fintech lender/servicers.

In general, we find very few complaints against fintechs. Are fintechs doing a particularly good job making and servicing student loans?
But complaints against fintechs are heavily concentrated around the issue of confusing or misleading advertisements. We suggest this might be a particularly fruitful area for intervention by the CFPB.
In a follow-up article, we review the narratives associated with student loan complaints and identify some additional areas for possible intervention. Watch this space for an update after the February/March law review submission cycle!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matthew Bruckner

Matthew Bruckner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Prof_Bruckner

Dec 28, 2022
ChatGPT wrote a surprisingly (to me) coherent answer to a contracts exam prompt. ImageImage
I regenerated the response three times. This is the only one that discussed the reasonable expectations doctrine, though it wasn't particularly in-depth.
It would get a lot of "?" "why?" and "so?" responses from me because it doesn't explain why, for example, that the contract calls for "re-pav[ing]", sealcoating is excluded. It's mostly facts and conclusion.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(