Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jan 5, 2023 19 tweets 9 min read Read on X
BREAKING CHEESE 🧀🧀🧀
#humpgate #TGAgate

1⃣ We found the humps.
2⃣ the EMA knew about them
3⃣ the analysis appears to be synthetic

@chrismartenson @stkirsch @Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan
Just a reminder that these are the same humps that we found in the TGA batch analyses here

They are contaminants at 3000nt and 2000nt length. The main mRNA should be about 4000nt length.
The EMA knew about these humps because they had them analysed. But only to a point.

Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
Here is the full document
files.catbox.moe/sg745z.pdf

The analysis was done by the Swedish Medical Products agency.
lakemedelsverket.se/sv
So someone spotted the humps that I also found and decided to separate them out from the main spike.

"Peak 1" is the non-spike RNA
"Peak 2" is the spike RNA
According to their analysis, the additional RNA had the 5'cap (which is the start of the RNA) but missed the end (the poly-A tail)

So it looked like it was broken fragments of the main RNA - but only the first part.

Where was the second part?
The whole fragment is 4284nt long. So if there is a 3000nt fragment with a 5'cap (with no poly A tail) there should be a 1284nt fragment floating around with a polyA tail!

Think of it like a lizard losing it's tail...
So what did they do to investigate this? Well, they assumed it must be spike RNA and therefore ran some Western blots (looking for protein) looking for spike protein fragments.

They showed that you need both the 5'cap and the polyA to produce the protein...
These are supposed to be Western blots with antibody staining each section of the spike protein (S1 and S2).

These showed that you need both ends to make spike.

You don't always need a polyA tail to make protein but OK, let's accept this.
Now they do the Western for Peak 1 (non-spike) and Peak 2 (spike) and stain with spike antibody.

The non-spike (peak 1) doesn't stain in either sample.

This means either it is not producing spike protein fragments, OR IT IS PRODUCING ANOTHER PROTEIN. Western blot as described in the document. Each black line i
In fact the document specifically requested "to further characterise the truncated and modified mRNA species present"

It's not just me.

Of course, that never happened. The only way to characterise these RNA fragments is by sequencing, and it has not been done.
So, to recap at this point we have:
1⃣aberrant mRNA at 3000nt and 2000nt, which cannot be a broken spike (4000nt)
2⃣those mRNA do NOT code for spike
3⃣no sequencing has been done to characterise the mRNA.
4⃣the fragments have 5' caps and are therefore active
Now the worst bit (as if the rest wasn't bad enough)...

Those Westerns are not right.

Here's what normal Westerns look like (this is from the same document). They are gels so they contract randomly, which is why nothing is ever a straight line.
(I'm not even going to start on the many different spike fragments in that gel).

Here are some more examples.

Note the typical features:
▶️Not straight lines
▶️Bleeding
▶️Rounded edges
▶️Uneven lines/bars
Now let's look at the first gel picture in the document "from the sponsor"

It's the straightest gel ever.

Not just that....
But look how regular and symmetrical these bands are.

It's impossible.
It even contradicts their own gel in figure 8.

And the document itself is dithered which means...
The EMA have the original hi-res document with pictures and they copied it with dithering to black-and-white to obfuscate any attempts at assessing the probity of the gels.

Just to push the point, this is what happens when you synthesise an image like this with dithering.
So the Westerns appear to be totally fabricated. I'm happy to be proven wrong on this.

My guess is that the EMA or the Swedish medicines agency know that there is something else in that product, and it isn't degraded spike.

Oh well. Russian roulette it is.
h/t to @JM125reasons for providing this important document

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Oct 15
I'm going to explain why this chart is so important and why @jsm2334 is being disingenuous by ignoring it - whilst making points that undermine the "real world vaccine data" industry.

It's a Kaplan-Meier curve and it obliterates Jeffrey's argument.

THREAD response🧵below Image
Just to go over it... the lines show what proportion of subjects (children) ended up without chronic disease up to 10 years after being studied.

It's called a survival analysis because it's used for cancer survival.

If the red line was a cancer drug it would be a blockbuster Image
It shows that by the end of the 10 year follow-up, of those that they could still follow up (who stayed in the study) 57% (100-43%) of vaccinated kids had chronic disease (e.g. asthma) and 17% (100-83%) of unvaccinated kids did.

A huge difference not explainable by chance. Image
Read 17 tweets
Oct 4
HOLY 🧀

The lead of the WHO steering committee - that stopped your elderly relative getting antibiotics for COVID - was Janet Diaz.

But Fiona Godlee, who lied about @DrAndyWakefield, and lied about the @bmj_latest being paid by Merck, was on the committee https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/be027488-3a45-4ba2-b413-6914d198714f/content
Janet Diaz was the person that led the #MAGICApp guideline committees that stopped your grandma getting antibiotics for her post-viral pneumonia, leading to her death.

But she did this with the help of @pervandvik who deleted his account

Image
Diaz here tells you that COVID kills you by an overreacting immune response, but that was never true.

She was an intensivist recruited by the WHO in 2018.

None of this was true, but it sold a LOT of drugs and killed a LOT of people
Read 7 tweets
Sep 26
Hey @Grok...

Which US govt organisation blew a hole in the ozone layer in 1958 by sending atomic bombs to the troposphere over the Antarctic in operation Argus - then blaming the resulting destruction of ozone on CFC's?

When was DARPA created?
nuke.fas.org/control/ctr/ne… x.com/grok/status/19…
Read 4 tweets
Sep 25
🚨THREAD:
At first glance this is a non-story as Moderna will claim that what they said was a mistake.

BUT @RWMaloneMD must know something as he states clearly that Pfizer manipulated the biodistribution images.

Why did they want to hide that it went to the ovaries?
👇👇 Image
It wasn't just Pfizer that hid the fact that the mRNA-LNP complex went to the ovaries (where it could not possibly provide its declared function in the lung).

Other "scientists" - acting on behalf of Pfizer - were mobilised to hide this scandal
arkmedic.info/p/whats-your-a…
The AMH drop (ovarian reserve) after vaccination was later shown by the Manniche paper after being denied by the Kate Clancy and Viki Males of the world.

mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4…
Read 14 tweets
Sep 19
Laura Wilson of @tandfonline can either choose to uphold scientific integrity.

Or choose to be an accessory in the biggest securities fraud scandal of our time.

I wonder what she will choose.

@STMAssoc is sponsored by @Silverchairnews

@Kevin_McKernan
#pubpeergate Image
Image
Can you see how it works?

Institutes like the @STMAssoc get their money from the journals who get their money from pharma.

And Bill Gates.

All controlled by big money interests.

Laura has no chance.
Unless she blows the whistle to the @SECGov

But this time the Arnold foundation's @RetractionWatch have not only revealed with their "exclusive" that they were directly involved in trying to get this important paper retracted...

But are trying to make Wilson the fall guy.

stm-assoc.org/people/laura-w…Image
Image
Read 10 tweets
Sep 13
🧵If you have decided after 48 hours that "The Israelis did it" you have not only fallen for the deep state's playbook again... but you probably think that Ashley Babbitt was killed by a movie gunshot to the shoulder.

Stop falling for the narratives.
[credit: @wooz_news ]
For the record the official cause of death was listed as "gunshot wound to the left anterior shoulder". This is not possible as the cause of death of the woman in the video as portrayed.

nationalfile.com/breaking-medic…Image
Instantaneous death as portrayed in the Babbitt video cannot happen with a gunshot to the shoulder as it does not involve the spinal cord or brain.

There are also no major vessels to bleed out (which would take a while) other than the subclavian. If that bled out enough to cause mortality there would be a bloodbath.

The Wooz news video confirms the lack of bleeding.Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(