Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jan 5, 2023 19 tweets 9 min read Read on X
BREAKING CHEESE 🧀🧀🧀
#humpgate #TGAgate

1⃣ We found the humps.
2⃣ the EMA knew about them
3⃣ the analysis appears to be synthetic

@chrismartenson @stkirsch @Daoyu15 @Kevin_McKernan
Just a reminder that these are the same humps that we found in the TGA batch analyses here

They are contaminants at 3000nt and 2000nt length. The main mRNA should be about 4000nt length.
The EMA knew about these humps because they had them analysed. But only to a point.

Not only did they ONLY perform on analysis on the assumption of what they THOUGHT was in the product, but they accepted what now appear to be synthetic Western blots as evidence.
Here is the full document
files.catbox.moe/sg745z.pdf

The analysis was done by the Swedish Medical Products agency.
lakemedelsverket.se/sv
So someone spotted the humps that I also found and decided to separate them out from the main spike.

"Peak 1" is the non-spike RNA
"Peak 2" is the spike RNA
According to their analysis, the additional RNA had the 5'cap (which is the start of the RNA) but missed the end (the poly-A tail)

So it looked like it was broken fragments of the main RNA - but only the first part.

Where was the second part?
The whole fragment is 4284nt long. So if there is a 3000nt fragment with a 5'cap (with no poly A tail) there should be a 1284nt fragment floating around with a polyA tail!

Think of it like a lizard losing it's tail...
So what did they do to investigate this? Well, they assumed it must be spike RNA and therefore ran some Western blots (looking for protein) looking for spike protein fragments.

They showed that you need both the 5'cap and the polyA to produce the protein...
These are supposed to be Western blots with antibody staining each section of the spike protein (S1 and S2).

These showed that you need both ends to make spike.

You don't always need a polyA tail to make protein but OK, let's accept this.
Now they do the Western for Peak 1 (non-spike) and Peak 2 (spike) and stain with spike antibody.

The non-spike (peak 1) doesn't stain in either sample.

This means either it is not producing spike protein fragments, OR IT IS PRODUCING ANOTHER PROTEIN. Western blot as described in the document. Each black line i
In fact the document specifically requested "to further characterise the truncated and modified mRNA species present"

It's not just me.

Of course, that never happened. The only way to characterise these RNA fragments is by sequencing, and it has not been done.
So, to recap at this point we have:
1⃣aberrant mRNA at 3000nt and 2000nt, which cannot be a broken spike (4000nt)
2⃣those mRNA do NOT code for spike
3⃣no sequencing has been done to characterise the mRNA.
4⃣the fragments have 5' caps and are therefore active
Now the worst bit (as if the rest wasn't bad enough)...

Those Westerns are not right.

Here's what normal Westerns look like (this is from the same document). They are gels so they contract randomly, which is why nothing is ever a straight line.
(I'm not even going to start on the many different spike fragments in that gel).

Here are some more examples.

Note the typical features:
▶️Not straight lines
▶️Bleeding
▶️Rounded edges
▶️Uneven lines/bars
Now let's look at the first gel picture in the document "from the sponsor"

It's the straightest gel ever.

Not just that....
But look how regular and symmetrical these bands are.

It's impossible.
It even contradicts their own gel in figure 8.

And the document itself is dithered which means...
The EMA have the original hi-res document with pictures and they copied it with dithering to black-and-white to obfuscate any attempts at assessing the probity of the gels.

Just to push the point, this is what happens when you synthesise an image like this with dithering.
So the Westerns appear to be totally fabricated. I'm happy to be proven wrong on this.

My guess is that the EMA or the Swedish medicines agency know that there is something else in that product, and it isn't degraded spike.

Oh well. Russian roulette it is.
h/t to @JM125reasons for providing this important document

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

May 2
"Look over here not there"

HPV vaccine "success" explained in one chart.

Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.

But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.

For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.

@DrSuzanneH7
@MaryanneDemasi
@DrJulieSladden
@DrJBhattacharya
@missyTHX1138
@stkirsch
@SecKennedyImage
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.

Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout Image
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout.
cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 23
This is the psychopathic research group from the UK that has just decided to fly planes into the clouds to block out the sun.

Crazy scientists like this have killed tens of millions in the last century.

DARPA killed the ozone layer in 1958.
This mob includes Nathan Wolfe.
A reminder. Nathan Wolfe is Metabiota. The Clinton's conduit for biological weapons manufature.
arkmedic.info/p/actuaries-inc
DARPA is run by literal Lysenkoist psychopaths and needs to be shut down before it destroys the world with its psychotic schemes.

The hole in the ozone layer was first seen after Operation Argus, when DARPA blew it up.

No, I'm not kidding.
newscientist.com/article/212533…
Read 7 tweets
Apr 18
Please understand how important this is.

Two major papers showed that the COVID vaccine spike protein causes cancer by suppression of p53.

The authors of both have been threatened into retracting their papers by pharma groups tied to the NIH.

That's why it's called #NIHgate
Read 8 tweets
Apr 17
Imagine a company so large that they can recruit thousands of "experts" yet you've never heard of them.

And imagine that those recruited scientists include agents of #PubpeerGate whose job is to silence other scientists.

@secgov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Image
@SECGov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Wow so this company is claiming influence with 11,000 scientists and multiple links lead back to pharma and the gene therapy corporations.

Broad institute. Who could have guessed?
#pubpeergate

putassoc.com/about-us/meet-…Image
Image
Image
Image
Inizio aka Inizio Putnam aka PHMR - the largest company you have never heard of.

Why?
They don't want you to know they are the chief influencers to indoctrinate doctors and the public into accepting failed pharma products.

putassoc.com/our-expertise/…
Read 6 tweets
Feb 23
WHOA!!! 🧀

@Yale could be up to their necks in the biggest HIPAA scandal since @UChicago

This is how the scam appears to have worked.

Harlan Krumholz owns a patent for managing health data through an app. "Hugo health" was the middle man providing the app to bait people claiming to be vaccine injured to join a study called LISTEN. But it was essentially being run on behalf of Pfizer/Janssen who paid him $3m in "research grants".

Thousands of injured signed up but only 241 patients were used in the "study" of which the publications were irrelevant and showed nothing other than "the vaccines saved millions of lives" bla bla. Nothing helpful for the vaccine injured at all.

But the bombshell - the data that they provided was able to be sold off to anyone they wanted to. It was in the consent form that most people didn't read. The data was held on hugo.health which has now gone. It was NOT HIPAA compliant.

How did we know that hugo.health's servers were not HIPAA compliant?

Yale told the participants in a email in July 2024 (attached).

So where did all that health data go?

Was it sold off to the highest bidder or used in a blackmail campaign against vulnerable people who were vaccine injured and couldn't work? (Like those that have targeted our accounts recently)

We don't know. But you can be damn sure that Yale knows, and took secret action to remedy the situation having already taken millions of dollars from pharma to run studies that undermined the vaccine injured.

That is why there is so much animosity suddenly being directed at the vaccine injured. They want to bury this story.

Yale could be in very big trouble.
They deserve a hashtag.
#YaleGate

@RobertKennedyJr @SECGov @AGHuff @chrismartenson

Patent:
patents.justia.com/inventor/harla…
Pubmed showing over 1000 papers (not possible for a clinician researcher writing his own papers):
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=krumholz…
LISTEN studies:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=krumholz…Image
Image
Image
@Yale @UChicago For those confused, please understand what a "limited hangout" is here. While you are rejoicing on the scraps of Daily Mail fodder, the pharma companies' new narrative is enshrined by those very articles.

"Injuries are very rare but it was worth it"

Getting more information about this pharma honeypot.

$2m to Iwasaki.

How much more pharmaceutical net went into this group to push boosters?

Image
Read 5 tweets
Dec 12, 2024
@jsm2334 I have 3 new questions:
1⃣ why didn't you appear on the Razzaghi paper using your data?
2⃣ is your data synthetic?
3⃣ what is the binomial probability that 18/20 of a university's research team come from a group that comprises 2% of the US population, if all groups are equal? Image
Image
@jsm2334 For those confused... The original thread on #OHDSI - the data curators claiming an impossible 96% efficacy rate for a type-mismatched vaccine against infection - is here.

This is not their first rodeo in synthetic data

#EMRgate #Surgisphere

@jsm2334 And there we are.
Kevin Haynes confirming that @OHDSI is run by Johnson & Johnson (AKA Janssen).
youtube.com/watch?v=lEYmH0…
x.com/Jikkyleaks/sta…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(