Ilya Shabanov Profile picture
Jan 6, 2023 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Declining Disruption.

#ScienceTwitter is abuzz with this recently published nature article.

I read into the study and 100s of comments.
Consensus: Grants and journals are to blame.

But the authors give a much better, more personal insights.

Here's what I learned:
👇
💡Define Disruption:

Suppose I publish a study S that cites X,Y,Z.

If disruptive:
Subsequent work will cite S primarily, as X,Y,Z are "obsolete".

Consolidating:
S,X,Y and Z will be cited. As all are still relevant.

They validate it using many studies from 20th century.
Reason 1: Decline in Diversity

We become "super nerds".
It makes our steps safer, but smaller.

Read "The Age of Insight" to learn how artists, psychologists and doctors all mingled in salons more than a century ago.

Maybe it's time to rediscover the connection to the arts?
Reason 2: Self Citation

We all have a self-confirmation bias.

Evidence against our point of view, tends to be disregarded.

It is hard to challenge oneself, especially as you get older. (ask your parents...)

But can it not even be liberating to make mistakes and pivot?
Reason 3: Information overload

Information overload is here to stay.

Luckily, AI might help wit this. It's becoming incredibly good at summarising already.

Managing your information wisely with tools and methods is another way to increase your capacity.
Reason 4: Personal benefits

Publish or Perish.
A high citation index opens doors but also servers our vanity.

Ask yourself a fundamental question:

Why do you do research?
🌈 Positive outlook:

The authors argue that despite the decline in disruptiveness, we are still not at the end of it.

The exciting scientific journey will continue.
Summary

► Nurture creativity by learning outside your area of expertise

► Find ways to manage/filter information overload

► Keep your vanity & bias in check

Don't get me wrong - we should question our system.

But equally important: We ought to question ourselves.
⬛️The case of Peer Review & Grants is more complicated:

• Peer review became a requirement in ~1970s (e.g. '73 for nature).

• The first NSF grant was awarded in 1952.

If we look at the graph: Decline was way under way then.

Ideas?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ilya Shabanov

Ilya Shabanov Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Artifexx

Apr 10
This is what my paper looks like.

It shows every result & decision of 3+ months.

Let me walk you through it:
👇 Image
The blue boxes are questions.

The green boxes are data sources.

Certain data can answer certain questions.Image
I use the data to answer questions.

The result can be a plot, for example.

The arrow labels are very short answers. Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 14
What if there was a way to get AI to write like you, not like a robot?

Here's how to train AI to write in your (academic) style in just 3 simple steps 👇 Image
🔍 Step 1: Gather Representative Writing

Get a few pieces of text that contain good examples of how you write and combine them into AI readable text files using . Gobble.botImage
🤖 2. Generate a Style Blueprint

Enter the following prompt into ChatGPT to create a detailed description of your writing style:

"I need you to create a style blueprint based on the text examples I am providing. Describe the style of writing in a few sentences, mention these attributes: Conciseness, Eloquence, Vividness, Assertiveness, word choice, jargon, sentence length, .

Here is the text example:

.

Compact this into a set of instructions for AI that can be used to replicate this writing style. Do not use lists, just a paragraph."Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 25
Just tested SciSpace Deep Review AI.

It analyzed 1750 papers and wrote a 3,050-word lit review - in three minutes.

Don't miss this milestone:
👇 Image
While the output isn’t ready for direct publication, the level of detail is remarkable.

AI-assisted tools like @scispace_ are changing how researchers conduct literature reviews

It gets faster, easier and more structured. Image
Start by visiting and typing in a preliminary research question, just as you would for a literature search.

Select "Deep Review" under the search box. typeset.io/searchImage
Read 8 tweets
Feb 19
I just built a "Research Oracle", an AI that speeds up my research.

Here is how you can build yours:
👇 Image
A "Research Oracle" is an AI that contains a lot of knowledge about your research. Once you built it use it to:

✅ Find citations
✅ Polish writing & logical flow in your manuscripts
✅ Help with lit reviews
✅ Suggest new ideas for your research
✅ Check for errors Image
ChatGPT has a new feature called "Projects".

It bundles chats + files + custom instructions.

Create one and give it a few papers as a knowledge base. Image
Read 7 tweets
Feb 10
I tried 50+ academic GPTs.

Most are just amateur projects.

Here are the top 18 that will actually boost your productivity: Image
If you have never used CustomGPTs:
→ Go to ChatGPT
→ Click "Explore GPTs
→ Search for the GPTs mentioned above
→ Start a conversation Image
Leveraging AI for your academic writing will make you super productive.

I will explain how in the upcoming webinar:

Read 4 tweets
Feb 8
Struggling to write research papers?

I found a game-changing method using AI:
(prompt in the thread)
👇 Image
Here is an example of what core sentence s look like.

Each sentence will be expanded into a full paragraph using AI. Image
Here is the simple prompt I am using:

I am writing an introduction paragraph on:
""" """

The paragraph needs to convey the following message: """ """

Here are my notes that I want you to incorporate:
""" """
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(