With the Privacy Community's Who's Who sharing their views...
@gabrielazanfir: "The community spent a lot of time analyzing and understanding requirements for consent and legitimate interests in the past years, and not so much the ‘contract’ lawful ground"
@omertene signaling that European DPAs may be ready "to rewrite consumer contracts, including terms of use, to counter power imbalances and impose privacy protective measures.”
@EstelMP on this predicting "that the privacy invasive targeted-ads business model is slowly but surely ending and that privacy-friendly solutions will need to be found quickly"
@IAB's Lartease Tiffith: "This wasn’t a slam dunk case, clearly. What we have is a lot of regulatory uncertainty, there is still some ambiguity and there are clarifications that are needed."
@NathalieLaneret: "It is necessary that GDPR legal bases are interpreted in a flexible manner to align with the wide varieties of business activities and relationships of the rich and complex advertising ecosystem"
@OdiaKagan: companies should focus on providing “appropriate disclosure, in real time, not buried in long terms of use, in language that is clear and easily understood by the consumer”
@PrivacyPros will host a LinkedIn Live that dives into the need to know. Stay tuned!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm reading and live-tweeting my hot-takes (starting with the 196-page Instagram decision)!
But before that, (re-)familiarizing myself with IAPP's recent infographic on legal bases! iapp.org/media/pdf/reso…
Issue 1: does hitting 'agree to terms' button count as #GDPR consent (Meta said it didn't intend it to count as consent... @NOYB said the button was 'forced' consent and misleading): DPC agreed with Meta