A P.A. doing intake recently informed me ME isn’t an accurate name and suggested I shouldn’t be using it, least of all in a medical office. Shortly after admitting he’d heard of CFS, but not ME/CFS. 🧵
His argument is problematic, as I responded, because ME/CFS is the widely agreed upon name, used in the ICD, by CDC and others. It’s also not the only name poorly reflective of its distinctive pathologies (though those get a pass because, well, we’re used to them).
But the fact that he felt the need to drive it at all is insane. Patients should never be belittled when they relay diagnoses, however seemingly justified in the moment. What may feel like an intellectual exercise for the provider may feel like life and death for the patient.
There are profound asymmetries in the relationship between patient and doctor that affect how each engages and what each expects from the interaction. But medical providers don’t seem aware of how loaded appointments can be for patients.
And that, as sick people know, further adds to the burden of being a patient. You have to understand these asymmetries and manage them to wring some distant cousin of good clinical care out of our broken medical system.
That may mean being strategic about how you engage, so you limit providers’ opportunity to drive agendas that don’t serve your interests. A neuro-ophthalmologist once decided all my problems were due to gluten! And proceeded to derail an appt. I’d traveled 100 miles for.
Or that may mean finding a new provider (or foregoing care), so you don’t have to accept abuse. I lean toward the latter. But either way, you have to make peace with abuse and your dependence on an abusive system for the care and benefits you need to live.
The rant, and other behavior, was upsetting, but what upsets me more is how often patients green in their illness encounter providers unable to meet them where they are, and how those patients will bear the burden of that failure once the appt. is over.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Lazell-Fairman

Matt Lazell-Fairman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mfairma

Jan 9
Some articles on ME/CFS are ignorant, but @nataliesurely‘s @newrepublic piece last month is so shockingly bad, so suffused with CBT/GET Brigade rhetoric that it’s hard not to believe it’s an exercise in bad faith. 1/7
The familiar tropes are all there, from the suggestion patients disparage mental health disorders and turn to illness because it gives them identity to misleading descriptions of what PACE offers and represents. 2/7
One line particularly stuck in my craw, though: “Considering PACE’s ultimately rather mundane finding, the tenacity of the response [from pts] is quite surprising.” The line implies unreasoned outrage on the part of patients. 3/7
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(