Bakshali Manuscript Folio 14 has world's first use of "0" or "Zero" as a Placeholder dating 2-3rd Century AD
सुण्य-स्थान sunya-sthana or 'empty place' has been used several times.
2/16
The original writer of Bakshali manuscript knew "Sumerian" (c. 4500 – c. 1900 BC) or their existence.
The writer writes on Folio #33 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐒𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐬 (𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐞𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐞𝐬) 𝐝𝐰𝐞𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐧 "𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐞𝐫𝐮".
3/16
Bakshali Manuscript on mathematics is older than many Greek writers. It is also a precursor to Aryabhatta's contribution
4/16
Bakshali Manuscript written on birchbark was found at Bakhshali near Mardan on the north-west frontier of India in 1881
Folio 50, mention that it was scribed by a Brahmana, a prince of calculators, the son of Chajaka (चाजाका) a hindu and a great devout to #Shiva
5/16
Given that the Script is a copy of an original. The original work must date prior to 2nd Century.
This survived written copy may be reprint of older work carried over long before.
The researcher agreed that Script was totally Indigenous
6/16
The Manuscript elaborates:
linear equations
Indeterminate equations of the 2nd °
Arithmetical progressions
Quadratic equations
Approximate value of √
Complex series
Problems of the type x (1-a1)(1-a2)....(1-an) = P
The computation of the fineness of gold
Mensuration
7/16
The numerals used in the Bakhshali manuscript resembles to Kannada numerals
8/16
The scheme of exposition used is Sutram सूत्रम Udaharanam उदाहरनम् Styapanam स्त्यपनम Nyasa न्यासा Karanam कारणम Pratyanam परत्यनाम
QED what i learnt in my schooling 🙂
9/16
Negative Sign was denoted as "+" Plus sign while Positive Sign as "."
10/16
Certain operators are often abbreviated such asfor bhaga, placed after a term to indicate that it is itd ivisor.
se°3 for sesam, a remainder.
mu°5 for mulam, a root, a quantity that has a root, capital,
pha°7 for "phalam", an answer
11/16
The rule for approximation and 2nd Approximation of Square root is given in the form of an equation.
12/16
The writers asserts that Indian mathematics has reached Nessel-mann's third and the last stage of development of the science of algebra long before all the other nations of the world by inventing good system of notations
13/16
Change ratios, Time Measures, Arc Measures, Money Measures, Weight Measures, Length Measures, Capacity Measures are well defined in the manuscript
1️⃣ The first diamond ever touched by human hands came from Indian soil. Golconda mines, 4th century BCE. We didn't dig for profit. We picked them from riverbeds like pebbles. 💎
Then someone realized they could own what the earth gave freely.
2️⃣ 1600s: Golconda diamonds weighed 23 million carats annually. The world's entire supply. Tavernier documented it. Shah Jahan embedded them in the Peacock Throne.
We controlled brilliance itself.
3️⃣ 1739: Nadir Shah walks into Delhi. Walks out with the Kohinoor and the Peacock Throne. Combined worth? Impossible to calculate. The throne alone held 26,733 gems.
You already know that for over 2,000 years, Indian smiths forged steel so sharp it cut European swords in half. So resilient it became legend across continents.
By 1900, those same smiths were classified as backward. Primitive. Incapable of innovation.
What happened between? 🧠⚔️ You don't know!!
A 5-step manual for erasure. READ On 👇
#decolonisation #UncropTheTruth
1/7
Step 1: Extract the technique
Indian wootz steel arrived in British laboratories in 1795. Samples were analysed, chemical compositions documented, papers published in the Royal Society. The steel was credited to "Eastern origin." The smiths who forged it? Unnamed. Untraced. Irrelevant.
The technique was extracted. The technician was erased.
2/7
Step 2: Disrupt the ecosystem
Wootz steel required specific forests for charcoal, particular ores, seasonal smelting cycles. Colonial forest laws between 1855–1878 criminalized wood collection, turned smelting zones into "reserved land," cut access to raw materials.
The furnaces went cold. Not because knowledge disappeared, but because resources were locked behind permits the smiths couldn't obtain.
1/ When artefacts disappear from protected monuments, the response is usually administrative.
Files are opened, reports are written, and records are updated.
By the time this happens, the loss has already occurred much earlier.
2/ Many antiquities under protection are still incompletely catalogued, irregularly verified, or stored without consistent physical security.
In such cases, legal custody exists on paper, but effective control on the ground is weak or absent.
3/ Once local community presence was removed from many sites, informal and continuous surveillance disappeared with it.
As a result, losses are often discovered only years later, during audits or inspections, when recovery is no longer realistic.
(3/5)