"US Consumer Product Safety commissioner said gas stove usage is a “hidden hazard.” Any option is on the table. Products that can’t be made safe can be banned"
We have to get rid of gas turbines and home furnaces as fast as possible too (for climate reasons especially). But those ony pollute outdoor air, so we breathe 1000 times less of those exhausts vs. cooking stoves. Stoves are terrible for indoor pollution.
Electric induction cooks as well as gas and is much more energy efficient. And even if everyone switched, it is small in overall electricity consumption
NO reason to not get rid of cooking stoves already. Other than the pervasive influence of FF industry
I don't think this is correct. The smallest electric service in the US is typically 100 A at 220 V, which is ~22 kW of power
An induction stove with 3 burners uses 6 kW when ALL 3 burners are at max power, which would be very infrequent. More typically 1-2 kW, not an issue.
Sorry, I strongly disagree. People are misinformed and easily manipulated by the powerful fossil fuel industry. And they are exposing their kids (which don't have a choice) to toxic pollutants.
Gas stoves should be BANNED, just as asbestos or lead paint
That's what they said of getting rid of asbestos or lead paint, or of lead in gasoline... (or now, we have bans coming up for gasoline and diesel cars in many countries and in California)
It'll happen faster than we expect (& certainly than you expect)
- They are of concern for outdoor air pollution, which is also bad in many places. But not of concern for indoor air, unless poorly vented (more common than we think)
& we need to get rid of all fossil fuels as fast as we can for climate
This is incorrect. A hood helps but doesn't eliminate problem
See these tests: "while using a range hood helped lower levels [...] we still recorded levels that exceeded 1-hour guidelines set by the World Health Organization"
Some people (perhaps this person) are misunderstanding what's being proposed: a ban on the SALE of new gas stoves (together with incentives to get rid of the already installed ones)
2/ This post builds upon the results of our just-published paper, in which for the first time we evaluate the indoor air quality impacts of GUV disinfection.
3/ We know now that airborne transmission is the only important way in which COVID-19 spreads, and it is also important for the flu and other respiratory viruses.
Therefore, removing viruses from the air is important
1/ INTERCOMPARISON of AFFORDABLE HOME RADON SENSORS
[TDLR: they compare well]
Radon:
- invisible odorless radioactive gas
- Rises from ground & accumulates indoors
- 2nd leading cause of lung cancer
- EPA link for more background
2/ Radon is more of a problem in some places than others, depending on the rocks in the soil. Places with granite are worst. There are maps such as from EPA or Airthings.
November is lung cancer awareness month, EPA promotes hashtag: #TestFixSaveALife
2/ Y esto es con mascarillas en su mayoría MEDIOCRES o POBRES como las que se han llevado en todos los colegios
El efecto sería mucho mayor si se hubieran llevado mascarillas de más calidad como KF94 o elastoméricas (e.g. flomask.com)
SI SE PUEDE!
3/ Hubo un estudio en España que concluyó lo contrario hace unos meses (tuvo mucha prensa interesada).
Pero era un estudio MUY POBRE: unas clases CON y otras SIN mascarilla en el mismo colegio. Los niños tienen hermanos, se contagian en casa o en otros sitios en la MISMA ciudad
There were lots of other areas of agreement in this DELPHI study, including the use of "vaccines plus" approach. So not just vaccines, but also NPIs non-pharmaceutical interventions) to reduce transmission, such as ventilation and filtration, high-filtration masks, isolation...
A lot more details of the overall @Nature DELPHI 386-expert 112-country study on "How to end the COVID-19 public health threat" in the posts from @JVLazarus. e.g.: