Sharma: We are dealing with 354, 354a and others. There is just one non bailable offence. If the non bailable section carries maximum 5 years.
Sharma: Higher courts have been reminding us that when the offence carries a punishment of less than 7 years, the State has to follow certain safeguards. In this case Arnesh Kumar guidelines have not been followed.
Sharma: They issued a notice to me under Sec 41a CrPC. My understanding is this notice is issued when they do not want to arrest. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Judge notes that there is some overwriting on the Sec 41a notice.
On Jan 4 when the FIR was registered, Air India had already initiated an internal inquiry. I appeared before them. I did not run away. If I was an evader, I would have run away. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Sharma: The question is can in the very first instance, a NBW be issued? There are case laws which say that in the first instance only a bailable warrant can be issued. Simultaneously I was placed under arrest in Bengaluru.
Sharma: When investigation is on, I make this point everywhere, magistrates should not get into the arena of aiding the investigation. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Sharma. Of course it is revolting to go through something like this. But when someone unzips himself in a public place, there will be a driving intent for that.
Sharma: The case is that I am inebriated... The question is was the unzipping to satisfy a sexual desire? That is not the case. I am not running away from the fact that it was obscene.
Sharma: Please see sections 509 and 510. They are both bailable offences.
Now please come to 354. It deals with sexual harassment.
Sharma: The complainant's case does not put me as a lustful man... I don't undermine what she went through. the trial will take time. But the man has been sacked... He is not a flight risk.
Sharma: On the date when FIR was registered it was flashed across all new channels but I appeared before the Air India ICC inquiry committee. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
PP: This is highly probable that he may influence the complainant. He is a person of means and highly influential. The investigation at an initial stage. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Judge asks IO how many statements have been recorded.
IO: We have recorded 164 statements of the complainant. Statements of 7 others have been recorded and 6 are yet to be recorded.
Complainant's lawyer says as the man sobered up he apologised for the incident and the Air India staff tried to mediate.
Lawyer: They are saying we have agreed to a settlement. There is nothing on record to show that I even wanted a mediation.
Lawyer: The court has to examine whether bail can be granted to an offender who first said that he did, apologised for it but later recanted. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Lawyer: He is saying he was intoxicated. Intoxication can never be a defence. It's not his case that he was given liquor without his knowledge. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Lawyer: My complaint was on 28, it was only because of his influence that FIR took so many days.
Lawyer: The Father of the accused is sending me messages in WhatsApp. He says Karma will hit me and then deletes the message. #ShankarMishra#AirIndiaincident@airindiain
Lawyer: On the date of arrest he writes this message.
Judge: How did your number get to him?
Sharma: The settlement amount was 15K. His son in law who is a professor in US writes a mail to Air India asking for compensation for the ticket fair. He says if it is not done, he will reveal the incident to media.
#Joshimathsinking Uttarakhand government informs Delhi High Court that it has formed two committees to look into the rehabilitation and mitigation efforts at Joshimath. #DelhiHighCourt#Joshimathcrisis
Uttarakhand's Dy Adv Gen informs the court that the government has already deployed NDRF and SDRF and many people have been relocated out of the place.
He adds that a rehabilitation package is also being prepared. #DelhiHighCourt#Joshimathcrisis
The submission was made while the court was hearing a PIL demanding constitution of a high powered committee to look into the crisis. #DelhiHighCourt#Joshimathcrisis
Constitution Bench of #SupremeCourt led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to continue hearing pleas regarding tussle between AAP-led Delhi government vs the LG over control over services in national capital.
In her order, Metropolitan Magistrate Komal Garg says
that the alleged act of the accused relieving himself upon the complainant is utterly disgusting and repulsive.
The court adds that the alleged act in itself is sufficient to outrage the modesty of any woman.
"Egregious conduct of the accused has shocked the civic consciousness and needs to be deprecated." #AirIndiaincident#ShankarMishra
Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud to be presented with Harvard Law School's Award for Global Leadership. Professor David B. Wilkins will be in a conversation with CJI Chandrachud.
Prof Wilkins: CJI Chandrachud has been a brilliant lawyer, judge at Bombay HC, A supreme Court judge and now the 50th CJI. He has been a stalwart defender of liberty and fundamental rights which is the hallmark of rule of law #SupremeCourt@Harvard_Law
The #NCLAT will hear today an appeal by #Alphabet (parent company of @Google ) against a @CCI_India order imposing a penalty of ₹936 crore on the tech giant for it anti-competitive practices in relation to its Play Store policies.
In addition to monetary fine, the CCI has also directed Google to cease and desist from participating in anti-competitive practices and to modify its conduct within a defined timeline. #NCLAT@CCI_India@Google#PlayStore
The appeal will be heard by a two-member bench of Justice Rakesh Kumar, Member (Judicial) and Dr Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical).
[Uphaar Tragedy] The Delhi High Court will hear today real-estate baron Sushil Ansal's plea seeking a stay on the release of upcoming Netflix series 'Trial By Fire'. #DelhiHighCourt@netflix#UphaarTragedy#SushilAnsal
Ansal has said that series is defamatory and infringes on his right to privacy.
His plea seeks permanent injunction against both the Netflix series as well as the book that it is based on. #DelhiHighCourt@netflix#UphaarTragedy#SushilAnsal