A degree of casual disrespect for women's a natural byproduct of understanding them. Not hatred, resentment or anything quite so actively energetic, but more a casual sexism. All sharp men with good sense are sexists, because it's impossible to have seen women so nakedly + not be
Truly, to respect women as much as polite society asks you to, you must inhabit a world of lies and delusion.
It's impossible to respect them that much, yet understand them so deeply.
It's either one or the other. You can't have both.
And yet the poetry and dualism to all this, is unlike resentment, sexism does not preclude romance or paternalism. In fact in the case of the latter, it augments it. When a sexist man cares for a woman, he is a more protective man *precisely* because he views her as less able.
Why would a man be so protective and caring towards a woman he believed was equal?
Vulnerability is feminine and the absence of it is unattractive.
It is only in seeing her as lesser that he can give her and be more for her.
But the modern woman's ego can't handle that truth.
If your young children didn't really need you, would your urge to parent be as strong? You don't see young children as being on your level, they're more vulnerable, weaker, needier, and you don't really respect or look up to them, but that doesn't stop you loving them does it?
I think women demand respect because they don't understand how men love
Men don't need to admire u to love you, only care for you
But a woman cannot love a man she doesn't respect, so she thinks she'll be mistreated or unloved if she isn't looked up to, when this isn't the case
A man doesn't need to be impressed by what a woman can do to care for her. She need only be a pure soul. That is sufficient to make a man care about a woman.
But a woman must be impressed. He must be more competent and ruthless, or she doesn't care. Totally different dynamic.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As there's morally bad things that feel good, and morally good things which feel bad
And it takes a sufficiently benevolent and cunning man to ensure you only feel good whilst doing good.
This is essentially the art of managing women.
But it's that inherent propensity to trust, obey and be compelled by emotion that makes women a liability - it's what makes them more manipulable and influenceable even at advanced age.
It's why a "woman who knows better" will still make mistakes.
Because he made it feel right.
Men don't trust their emotions as much as women, and although sometimes it gets the better of them, they don't see it as this perfect thing. They realise it can be misleading.
They don't believe "something feeling right" makes it true or wise or accurate.
If we define maturity as having empathy for you as a man, and we define empathy as having some insight into male psychology/your struggles and complementing that.
Then yes, most women never mature.
Only women who really have empathy for men are outliers with good dads.
From her perspective it’s accepting less than she thinks she’s worth because she’s not truly respectful of or attracted to the man she decided to marry
That’s why she calls it settling
In reality, she’s lucky to even have a man who thinks she’s worth the bother
She’s conceited
Imagine you have multiple potential investors and the least intelligent and poorest of them’s the only one who agrees to invest
And instead of being grateful you got the help you needed
You resent having to settle for your least preferred investor
The arrogance is breathtaking
Like you need them
But you won’t appreciate them and will in fact egregiously mistreat them because they aren’t “good enough” in your eyes
Even though you’re the fundamentally needy party and should be thanking God everyday they made it possible
Competing with a woman as a man is like competing with a child as an adult.
There is no upside for you.
If you win, you’re a bully, and if you lose, you’re a gay that got beat by a child/girl.
The asymmetry is inherently not in your favour.
This is why you need a pet woman as your champion to fight battles you can’t.
You actually see corporations do this all the time, even the police do it.
The police will use women to arrest women so they can’t fabricate a sexual abuse claim and so it doesn’t look as bad to the public
Elon has Linda Yaccarino to be the aligned HR mum for his company to offset all his “advertiser unfriendly” aka based masculine behaviour.
It’s amusing when you see it, but also an invaluable tool for you strategically.
All I will say is that the typical woman is not up to the task to “be your champion”.
It won’t be your wife, unless you married the wrong woman.
You’re looking for an unmarriageable, intelligent but knows how to be aggressive type of careerist woman who is tough and less delusional but has both positive masculine and negative feminine traits.
The whole “power couple” meme is very rarely done right and for the most part is just a man who married a masculine woman getting dictated to but thinking he’s in charge because he relies on her the way you would typically rely on a man.
It’s almost homosexual as zero polarity.
It’s only really possible with two outliers and even then it’s somewhat fraught.
Most celebrities are not good examples of this. I can think of maybe one good example.
But the average idiot girl boss thinks this is *THE MODEL* and what she deserves, when it will all but fail.
Being a top 1%er in any domain is shit because you have to suffer the tedium of almost everyone being shitter than you before getting curb stomped by an absolute alien who outpaces you by a factor of 10.
In chess that’s Magnus.
In football it’s Ronaldo.
In business it’s Musk.
Play literally any video game competitively and you will always find one absolute alien who makes all the other pros look shit (even though they’re all better than you)
It’s a universal phenomenon
In Hip-Hop it’s Eminem
Tupac got Goated because he died at his peak too young and got a cult/lore around his story
Artistically Eminem is actually the only undefeated one all the other rappers are scared of and find themselves publicly humiliated by when they try him
Women used to dealing with men who are always trying to prove their worth to them, don’t know how to be unannoying to men with nothing to prove to them.
They’re so used to getting to choose, that they haven’t actually developed the elegance necessary to get a man to choose them.
I can always tell when a woman who’s used to men trying to prove their worth to her is trying to get me to prove my worth to her
But what she fails to understand is:
I don’t give a shit what she thinks
It’s an affront to me she thinks she’s so above me she gets to test me
No.
Men like me indefinitely ignore women for this kind of behaviour
If you don’t want to be ignored: aim not to be annoying
Come from a place of modesty
If you’re coming from a place of arrogance and presume I must impress
Then I will never even bother with you let alone impress