Let’s look at facts. Here I am quoting from “SWOJN-Series-1, Vol-14”.
He clearly said in an interview on June 23, 1945 mentioning what he said in 1942 that he would fight Subhash Bose if his INA enters India.
3/n In fact he repeats taking about it on multiple occasions. Check these pages from Selected Works of JL Nehru, Series 1, Vol-14.
4/n So what was the reason for this change of heart? In fact it becomes very clear from his own words that Nehru jumped into INA matter for the elections. The people of India were too charged up to support INA, and not standing with them would have been suicidal for Congress.
5/n While writing to Maulana Nehru shows indirect disappointment that he is unable to carry on election rallies for many reasons of which INA trial is one of them.
6/n Nehru writes to Sardar expressing how he is liking to include INA veterans like Shahnawaz to congress. Of course it was for the INA wave of Indian public in time of elections.
7/n Nehru talks of congress ticket and col. Loganathan. Isn’t it an indication that Nehru was just trying to mainstream INA veterans to capitalise in elections.
8/n All of a sudden, same Nehru who wanted to fight against INA if they entered India, had gone onto tone of not seeing Bose as criminal.
Why?
Of course, because elections were on block. & he himself accepts that he is getting into legal battle after 25 years.
9/n In fact Nehru himself knew that he is a layperson to defend INA.
But people like @SupriyaShrinate goes on to credit him for the trial.
A wise mind would ask, why a person who never fought a legal battle for decades came to do it all of a sudden?
10/n You are wrong @SupriyaShrinate . Bose didn’t name regiment “Nehru.” The regiment already had a name from INA-1. Check snipet from the important book “The Forgotten Army: India's Armed Struggle for Independence, 1942–1945”
1/n Although I have been tired of debunking the works of DN Jha, I’ll do it again. This time for allegations against Raja Shashank to have persecuted Buddhists & bringing down Bodhi tree.
2/n Here the sayings of Hsuen Tsang is used to make a claim that Shashank persecuted Buddhists and brought down Bodhi tree. But this claim is simply mythical in nature.
Let me explain how.
3/n Tsang claims that a sapling of the Bodhi tree was replanted & this is one which actually grew into the big nature one when he visited. It was brought down by Shashank as he says.
2/n Eaton refers the work of Davis and Willis (Trophies of War) wherein he explains how Hindu Rajas were used to be looting Murtis (considered powerful), & then they installed them in custom-built Mandirs within their own domains.
3/n This is nowhere close to the ugly iconoclasm I was referring to done by Portuguese & Islamic invaders.
Though Eaton uses this source but builds a case exactly opposite.
2/n But court outrightly rejected the argument of encroaches that the encroached area is nazul land by virtue of their respective leases, through its 176-page order.
The honourable court observed following:
3/n A) It wasn’t a Govt Order & it didn’t grant any right to the encroachers, given that the document was executed only for the need of property’s management as per the Nazul Rules.
The Hindu tradition is indeed one of the most nuanced thought process in whole cosmos.
The idea to look at the world from Shunya to Shunya following with envisioning Bhagwan as Nirgun & Sagun is most unique idea among all.
The only tradition where people have zoomed down mighty nirgun into sagun. This is something that world outside seldom understands when it looks to divide world into polytheists & monotheist, atheist & theist, believer & non-believer.
Hindus perceived Indriyas as Devatas & hence Indra became the chief of all.
The process of Yagya & Puja Samskara involved(s) essential practice of invoking Indriyas, also with the vision to keep them balanced in line with Rta (the cosmic order).
Dear @CyberdomeKerala , I have quote tweeted my original tweet where I had produced details of the accused.
Prarthna also provided you all relevant evidence but it has been almost a week & the team seems only to be sleeping over the complaint.
Dear @CyberdomeKerala , the @IDFCFIRSTBank has taken steps from their side & are cooperating really well but for lack of push from your end they are unable to initiate any action.
My friend Prarthna tried to follow up with your team
There you go Madhavan Sir. Now let me give you clearer picture.
The GDP/Capita growth during Timurid rule was -ve, though GDP remained almost high. It means people were becoming poorer & like Brit Akbar too was a lootera. Brit took it to London, he sent to Mecca & his treasury.
The truth is that though Jalaluddin is made great for his “Revenue Policies,” his taxes were one of the highest. Both Irfan Habib & SM Ikram have used primary sources to show it.
You make him great for abolishing Jiziya but he extorted a lot more money than those with Jiziya.
Contemporary values?Akbar had a rule that those without veil would be made into prostitute.
No random use of negative adjectives but all the “qualities”u use to show Akbar as great come out as lie.
I hv this open challenge to anyone to debate with me & prove “Akbar was great!”