Two imp cases against #BillGates & Adar Poonawalla before Bombay High Court listed .
(i) Before Justice Riyaz Chagla*
(Court Room No. 21)( Fixed Matter at 2.30. p.m.)*
(a) I.A. No. 39735 of 2022 In Civil Suit (L) No. 33253 of 2023*
(Ambar Koiri Vs. Serum Institute and anr)
Under *section 340 of Cr.P.C.* for prosecution of Adar Poonawalla & others in perjury, issuing arrest warrant against Poonawalla &attachment of their property.
(b) I.A.(St.) No. 1146 of 2023.
Under *0.7 R-11 & Section 151 of Cr. P.C.* for dismissal of Suit filed by Serum Inst
*(ii) Before Division Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari & Justice P.D. Naik*
*[V@ccine Murder Case]* for direction to CBI to regiter FIR under section *sections 115, 302, 420, 409, 120 (b), 34, etc. of IPC* & *Section 4, 7 & 9* Drug & Magic Remedies Act against Adar Poonawalla, Sitaram Kunte etc. and #DiedSuddenlyNews #StoptheShotsNow
for grant of Rs. 100 Crores interim compensation for death of her 23 year old only son.
The case of Smt. Kiran Yadav is discussed worldwide and USA’s renowned group of Robert Kennedy Jr. published an article on ‘Childrens Health Defence’ portal on 20th Jan.
On the compensation being sought, the affidavit said that the petitioners have other legal remedies including approaching a civil court for damages.
It was also emphasised that a strict liability on Union or State governments for administering the vaccine is not legally tenable, since the vaccines are manufactured by third-parties.
"The Central Government asks citizens to file compensation cases against Serum Institute, responsible guilty officers of the state governments and not to seek from the Central government. #INeverSaidThis
Really? @PMOIndia @narendramodi_in
#NeverSaidThis.
But this is what you said just b4 the launch of the v@x campaign regarding v@x side effects. No mention/warning whatsoever of any of the serious side effects.
Our account @awakenindiamvmt was suspended for tweeting regarding potential C0vid V@ccine adverse events and violating supposed #twitter policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.
The data we had presented is officially accepted by many peer reviewed research papers as well Government Sources like VAERS.
If reporting about peer reviewed and documented evidence of potential adverse events of Covid v@ccine is misleading then
it would be considered the highest attack on free speech and the ability to inform and educate the public. It is the right of every individual to be informed about both the risks and benefits of any medical intervention.
India’s AEFI over the years has been woefully inadequate as indicated below. We therefore cannot infer the safety of the 💉from AEFI alone. We have to therefore collate reports from across the country to get a sense of the issue