BREAKING: The censorship regime in Brazil is growing rapidly, virtually daily now. We just obtained a censorship order that is genuinely shocking, directing multiple social media platforms to *immediately* remove numerous prominent politicians and commentators.
I can't overstate how shocking and dangerous this new censorship order is. It's from the same judge that even the NYT has been warning about as authoritarian: Alexandre de Moraes. Read this NYT article. It was from September. It's now severely escalating:
A sign of how repressive the situation in Brazil is: I've had to spent hours with lawyers even figuring out if I can report this. I've confronted governments around the world and this is the only time I've ever asked: "Should I report on this? Can I safely criticize this judge?"
But the only reason to become a journalist is to do your job no matter the threats and risks.
We'll be on live on Rumble with our @SystemUpdate_ program at its regular time - 7pm ET - to report this and explain the immense dangers of it. It's stunning.
Below is the 2nd article from the NYT on the dangers of this judge's censorship powers, from Oct.
I've never seen a judge in any democracy with this level of power. He's become a venerated hero of the Brazilian left, feared and off-limits from criticism
For the crime of criticizing this Judge - once hated by the Brazilian left as part of a "coup" government until this shocking censorship splurge - I was branded as "pro-terrorist" on Tuesday, trending for days.
The climate here is like 9/11: "with us or with the Terrorists."
The censorship regime implemented in Brazil makes the US and EU look like bastions of liberty.
*Ten* members of Congress - including some with the nation's highest vote totals - have been banned by this judge from social media even though the platforms say they violated no rules
This is not confined to Brazil. Just as Brazilian prosecutors copied the US's indictment of Assange to try to imprison me for my reporting, this censorship model implemented in Brazil will be used by other countries to bar all dissent.
It's a bridge too far even for the NYT.
But the breadth and scope of this order -- directing multiple platforms to immediately ban multiple politicians and analysts *within two hours,* upon threats of major fines - brings this to an all new level.
What right does a Brazilian judge have to order foreign platforms to ban politicians and journalists from their platform and threaten them with massive fines if they don't censor on command?
Alexandre de Moraes is now making himself Chief Censor not only of Brazil but the world.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Já que vou debater com o @NPTO (e outros que puderem de boa fé), vou guardar minhas respostas para lá - o Twitter é o pior lugar para debater perguntas complexas - mas quero fazer 2 pontos cruciais sobre o ataques mais comuns às minhas reportagens e as confusões mais difundidas:
1) Que eu estou impondo "a visão americana" é absurdo. Milhões de brasileiros concordam com minhas preocupações. E o NYT criticou de Moraes 2 vezes por que conversaram com **especialistas em direito e constituição brasileira** que explicaram como esse regime está bem perigoso:
2) Minhas objeções a de Moraes vão muito além da liberdade de expressão: são sobre a falta de devido processo. Pela ordem que revelamos, declarou as pessoas culpadas sem explicação, em total sigilo, essas pessoas não foram notificadas, sem oportunidade de contestar as acusações👇
The last thread in Portuguese was about an exclusive report we presented on last night's @SystemUpdate_. It concerns the growing and - for a modern democracy - unprecedented censorship system now implemented in Brazil. We obtained a chilling secret order
The censorship regime in Brazil has become so repressive - a single judge orders people banned and even arrested with no due process or rationale, all under secrecy - that even the NYT twice warned how grave this has become:
As in the US, the Brazilian left is united with the corporate media in support of this system. It's a 9/11 climate: if you question this judge, you're deemed "pro-Terrorist." Given the global consequence of this order, we also published our after-show:
Moro aqui há 17 anos, então sabia que minhas reportagens e críticas ao de Moraes enfureceria grande parte da esquerda.
Como disse o NYT, a esquerda e a mídia corporativa se uniram para fazer dele seu novo Moro: o juiz-herói que salva a nação e, portanto, não pode ser criticado.
Bons jornalistas, por definição, provocam ataques raivosos. Quando falo em faculdades, meu conselho é: "se vc precisa ser amado universalmente, o jornalismo não é para você". Os ataques agora são semelhantes ao #VazaJato, embora de petistas em vez de lavajatistas. Debater é bom!
Mas uma grande parte suja da esquerda não debate. Usaram meu marido para me atacar - desde teorias conspiratórias sobre sua doença até usar os sites de fake news criados sobre David por Oswaldo Eustáquio durante a #VazaJato - até o ponto de o nome dele entrar no TT e ficou.👇👇
Quem defende um princípio não está do lado de nenhuma facção política. Um princípio não serve à esquerda ou à direita.
Um princípio, por definição, tem aplicação universal. Aqueles que não conseguem raciocinar com princípios sempre assumem que todos sofrem da mesma incapacidade
Os princípios - como os direitos - não têm partido. Podem ajudar a esquerda um dia, a direita no dia seguinte.
Por exemplo, o princípio de que o Estado não pode punir um cidadão sem julgamento justo um dia pode libertar o Lula. No dia seguinte, proteger um bolsonarista.
Mas o próprio princípio – o direito a um julgamento justo, liberdade de expressão, limites ao poder judicial – serve e protege a sociedade inteira. Isso é o que diferencia os princípios do poder corrupto.
O fascismo e o autoritarismo só são possíveis na ausência de princípios.
In case anyone still wonders what happened to the Intercept:
The original idea was it would be an outsider publication adversarial to the US Security State, but its editors, craving approval, began hiring NYT and NBC reporters. Thus:
"The Church Committee brought the intelligence community fully under the rule of law and into the American system of government:" ex-NYT's Jim Risen.
I can barely think of a worse lie, a more blatant form of Deep State propaganda, a more un-journalistic belief to harbor.
The amazing thing about anyone saying that - much less Jim Risen - is he won a Pulitzer for the NYT in 2005 for revealing the NSA was *illegally* spying on Americans without the warrants required by law.
But this is how Trump broke these people's brains.
The question now is whether there are any places Biden *didn't* leave classified docs?
As I said, I find these episodes trivial. I spent years reading through the USG's most sensitive archives and learned *everything* is marked classified.