Thread by @jaycurrie

#VaccineDeath is trending. The "coincidences" are piling up. A few statistics are emerging which indicate that the jabs, and particularly the boosters, do very little to prevent serious illness but increase risk of cardiac events, clots and strokes. 1/

The jab proposition never made all that much sense. Why would you take a lightly trialled, irreversible, injection to reduce the danger of a disease with a 99.7% survival rate (for use olds). 2/

It might have made some sense, for the greater good, if the jabs prevented transmission and infection. But PH knew pretty much from the go that the jabs had never been tested for the prevention of infection or transmission. 3/

And, as the FOIAed Dr. Bonnie Henry emails demonstrated, PHO were also aware of adverse events and "bad lots" shortly after the jabs rolled out. The negatives have just kept coming. 4/

The ruthless narrative enforcement exercised by legacy media and big tech, is falling apart. There is still lots of work to be done on Twitter, but people can post freely about the jabs and their consequences. And they can link to Substack. 5/

When dimwits like @atRachelGilmore try to take on widely respected cardiologists with talking points from the Guardian, the ratio is delightful. And by disagreeing with Rachel you are not in danger of losing your Twitter account. 6/

The new Twitter is also allowing "sudden deaths" to be recorded publically. Is every celebrity or athlete death jab related? Probably not. But a lot are and having a public record lets that fact surface. 7/

The collapse of narrative enforcement has meant many people contemplating a booster are able to do a much better risk/benefit assessment. Which is part of the reason booster uptake has collapsed. 8/

But the very best thing about the narrative collapse is that parents pressured to jab their children are being given the other side of the story: COVID is simply not a serious threat to younger people, the jabs, on the other hand carry some significant risks. 9/