2/n “In his khutba, Nizamuddin Auliya condemned the infidels as wicked, saying:
‘He (Allah) has created Paradise and Hell for believers and the infidels (respectively) in order to repay the wicked for what they have done.’”
3/n “Auliya’s thought on Jihad against non-Muslims can be gleaned from his statement that Surah Fatihah, first chapter of the Quran, did not contain two of the ten cardinal articles of Islam, which were ‘warring with the unbelievers and observing the divine statutes...’
4/n He did not only believe in warring with the unbelievers or Jihad, he came to India with his followers to engage in it. He participated in a holy war commanded by Nasiruddin Qibacha in Multan.
5/n When Qibacha’s army was in distress facing defeat,Auliya rushed to him & gave him a magical arrow instructing: ‘Shoot this arrow at the direction of the infidel army.’ Qibacha did as he was told, & when daybreak came not one of the infidels was to be seen; they all had fled!
6/n When Qazi Mughisuddin inquired about the prospect of victory in the Jihad launched in South India under the command of Malik Kafur, the Auliya uttered in effusive confidence: ‘What is this victory? I am waiting for further victories.’”
7/n Dear @GautamGambhir , I have so far quotes from “The Life and Times of Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya” by Nizami KA who was a historian of Aligarh School.
& he has used primary sources to base his claims.
He further says:
8/n “The Sufis of India had no contradiction with the Ulema; both had a common goal—the interest of Islam, but to be achieved through different methods. Auliya used to say, ‘What the Ulema seekto achieve through speech, we achieve by our behavior.’
9/n Jamal Qiwamu’d-din, a long-time associate of Auliya, never saw him miss a single Sunnah of the Prophet.”
Such was Auliya, @GautamGambhir . Giving more light about him from 10/n
10/n Now I’m quoting from book, “Caliphs and Sultans: Religious Ideology and Political Praxis” by SS Sharma where he too had uncovered the primary sources to speak about Auliya.
Please read on.
11/n “Influenced by the unorthodox, controversial doctrines and practices of famous Arab-Spanish Sufi ideologue Ibn Arabi (d. 1240), Moinuddin Chisti and Nizamuddin Auliya were the most unorthodox and liberal amongst India’s Sufis.
12/n Annoying the orthodox, they had adopted musical sessions (sama) and dancing (raqs) in their rituals. However, when it came to the real question of Islam, they never took a stand against classical orthodoxy; they always put the Ulema ahead of them in religious matters.
13/n To the question of whether dancing and playing of musical instruments, as had been adopted by Sufi dervishes, were permissible, Auliya said, ‘What is forbidden by Law (Sharia) is not acceptable.’
14/n On the question of whether the controversial Sufi devotional practices were permissible or not, he said, ‘Concerning this controversy at present, whatever the judge (orthodox Ulema) decrees will be upheld.’”
“Nizamuddin Auliya (1238–1325), toeing the orthodox line, condemned the Hindus to the fire of hell, saying:
‘The unbelievers at the time of death will experience punishment.
16/n At that moment, they will profess belief (Islam) but it will not be reckoned to them as belief because it will not be faith in the Unseen... the faith of (an) unbeliever at death remains unacceptable.’ He asserted that
17/n ‘On the day of Resurrection when unbelievers will face punishment & affliction, they will embrace faith but faith will not benefit them... They will also go to Hell, despite the fact that they will go there as believers.’”
18/n “The Auliya used to accept large gifts sent by Sultan Alauddin from the spoils plundered in Jihad expeditions and proudly displayed those at his khanqah (lodge).”
Shame that we go to bow down our head to those who celebrated Islamic terrorism @GautamGambhir
19/n Amir Khusrau quotes his master Auliya in Afzalul Favaid (ff 78)
“It would be the day of Resurrection (Qiamat) when women will ride horses or walk about in the streets (…).Great harm would be done when women would get freedom.”
Such was his views about women @GautamGambhir
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I found a few abuses thrown at Biharis by a few language fanatics (eg @GargaC ). I can only pity there ignorance.
Bihar is the land which contributed abundant to the growth of Bharat intellectually, by wealth & also by art.
Rishi Kapila, the founder of Samkhya Philosophy & Yoga comes from Mithila, Bihar.
The first Upanishads traditions began in Bihar. One must be aware of Yajñavalkya, considered to be first Upanishad Scholars. The ideas of Vedanta began here.
One of the greatest Mathematician Aryabhatta was from the soil of Bharat.
Who can forget that the biggest set of universities Nalanda, Vikramshila etc thrived here in Bihar.
2/n Jadunath Sarkar taking cue from primary sources, tells the whole narrative of what exactly had happened.
Shivaji called on Krishnaji Kulkarni that being a Brahmin he should tell former if Afzal has bad intentions. Krishna ji told that Afzal indeed was up to mischief.
3/n That’s when Shivaji sent his agent Gopinath along with Krishna ji and former returned with information around mischievous plans of Afzal.
Had Krishnaji Kulkarni (whom @sandeep_PT wrongly claims to attack Shivaji) was main person who gives clues to Shivaji.
1/n Although I have been tired of debunking the works of DN Jha, I’ll do it again. This time for allegations against Raja Shashank to have persecuted Buddhists & bringing down Bodhi tree.
2/n Here the sayings of Hsuen Tsang is used to make a claim that Shashank persecuted Buddhists and brought down Bodhi tree. But this claim is simply mythical in nature.
Let me explain how.
3/n Tsang claims that a sapling of the Bodhi tree was replanted & this is one which actually grew into the big nature one when he visited. It was brought down by Shashank as he says.
2/n Eaton refers the work of Davis and Willis (Trophies of War) wherein he explains how Hindu Rajas were used to be looting Murtis (considered powerful), & then they installed them in custom-built Mandirs within their own domains.
3/n This is nowhere close to the ugly iconoclasm I was referring to done by Portuguese & Islamic invaders.
Though Eaton uses this source but builds a case exactly opposite.
2/n But court outrightly rejected the argument of encroaches that the encroached area is nazul land by virtue of their respective leases, through its 176-page order.
The honourable court observed following:
3/n A) It wasn’t a Govt Order & it didn’t grant any right to the encroachers, given that the document was executed only for the need of property’s management as per the Nazul Rules.