Our new work is out in @GlobalHealthBMJ today. This is the work of dozens of teams across 12 countries. Here we show the clear excess risk associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy. Here’s what we found and how we did it.🧵

gh.bmj.com/cgi/content/fu…
@GlobalHealthBMJ Yes, there are many studies about COVID in pregnancy. But this individual patient data meta-analysis tries to address some limitations & heterogeneity between previously published work. Plus, we include unpublished & re-analyzed data, including substantial data from LMICs. 2/x
We include >13 000 pregnancies in 12 countries & find COVID-19 during pregnancy was linked to big increases in the risk of
▪️maternal mortality,
▪️ICU admission,
▪️mechanical ventilation or any critical care,
▪️ diagnosis w pneumonia, preeclampsia, thromboembolic disease. 3/x
Infants born to infected pregnant women were more likely to be admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit & to be born too small (low birthweight) or too soon (preterm). 4/x
What makes us confident in our results? We have strict exposure definitions, we consistently define outcomes, & uniformly analyze data for each study. Plus we find consistent elevated risks from one country to the next. 5/x
I have so many other methods things to chat about w #epitwitter. (Prospective meta-analysis! Problems w pooling binomial proportions. Value of absolute risks here.) Here’s the protocol paper.

But let’s stick with public health implications for now. journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
So what’s this all mean? Yes COVID in pregnancy can be serious, but you can take steps to reduce your risk.

First, stay up-to-date on vaccines & boosters. Is it worth it? Yes! Meta-analysis showing benefits of vaccines in pregnancy is linked here. 7/x
nature.com/articles/s4146…
And pregnant people should consider other precautions like wearing a mask when you’re in crowded public places. 😷

If you do get sick, both patients and providers should consider treatment in pregnancy as needed. Anecdotally, pregnant women are undertreated. 💊
Lastly, vaccinations policy in pregnancy remains equivocal in more than 80 countries. Researchers, advocates, and policy makers need to take action to ensure fair access for drugs & vaccines in pregnancy globally.
comitglobal.org/explore/public…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Emily R Smith, ScD MPH

Emily R Smith, ScD MPH Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrEmilyRSmith

Sep 26, 2022
Happy to share our work @AJOG_thegray on clinical risk factors for adverse outcomes among women w COVID-19 in pregnancy & postpartum. We uniformly analyzed data from 33 countries/territories🌍, including 21,977 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection.🧵
ajog.org/article/S0002-…
@AJOG_thegray Similar to the general population, pregnant people with COVID-19 and comorbidities like diabetes, hypertension, & cardiovascular disease are at increased risk for worse COVID outcomes & and worse pregnancy outcomes. Forest plots showing the ri...
Importantly, we find that being underweight at the start of pregnancy is linked to COVID severity & adverse pregnancy outcomes.

This highlights the importance of global data.🌍 Previously limited data from areas w a higher burden of undernutrition have obscured this risk factor. Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 25, 2022
A few initial thoughts on the updated CDC “Community Levels” guidance.

Some good things here.
Some bad things.
Some points lack clarity or transparency.
1/8
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
The good things!

•A data-driven approach to turning policies on & off
•Additional indicators incorporated into the framework
•Emphasis on layered protections

2/8
Disappointingly, although the word equity appears in the guidance, there are no specifics.

See data from Prof @JuliaRaifman. Heaping the onus on local officials to ensure equity has left us with *major health disparities* throughout the pandemic.

3/8
Read 8 tweets
Jan 28, 2021
Given recent WHO interim vaccine recs in pregnancy, I want to share our new work @AJOG_thegray. Pregnant people are *TWICE* as likely to develop severe disease & have a 60% higher risk of death when it comes to #COVID19 as compared to non-pregnant women. ajog.org/article/S0002-…
This is the largest & longest running effort yet to characterize COVID risk in pregnancy based on epidemiologic surveillance system of viral respiratory diseases of Mexico (475 monitoring hospitals in the Mexican Public Health Network). (Thanks to @Raigam_Martinez & colleagues).
The adjusted case fatality rate for pregnant women was 1.3% overall, but rose to 2.1% and 5.9% for those aged 35 to 39 years and 40 to 44 years, respectively.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 10, 2020
Adding to the strangeness of 2020, I've now written a letter to the editors with concerns about a study that hasn't even been published! But scientists have to adapt to the current #Covid_19 context, right? So, here's what we have to say and why.🧵
The Danish mask study is registered & protocol paper is published, but I haven't seen the results. The study randomized people to get a box of free face masks + messages about wearing masks for 1 month. I actually think it's a great idea to test this approach. 2/x
[Early on I actually thought this (free masks on your doorstep) was a good idea for the US where people were reluctant to wear masks and Trump was looking to produce something via the war powers act. Alas. I digress.]
Read 11 tweets
May 24, 2020
Summer is here! We’re ready to get out of the house. But what's safe? Here's a great @NPR article from @AubreyNPR @laurelwamsley @cwroth on how experts think about the risks.

And you can evaluate your own risk by considering these 5 things. (1/x)

npr.org/sections/healt…
PEOPLE. Who are you spending time with and how many of them are there?

Meeting with one other person who has stayed home for the past two months is lower risk. Meeting with ten people who have high-risk jobs is higher risk.
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE): Face masks aren’t magic and don’t eliminate the possibility of spreading COVID-19. But if you have to be in close quarters, wearing a cloth face covering may reduce your risk.
Read 8 tweets
May 8, 2020
You’ve probably seen or heard about the #PlandemicDocumentary video. It reaches many conclusions that have zero scientific support and are dangerous because they could harm your health. Here are rebuttals and references to just a few of the false claims. A thread. (1/x)
False claim #1: The novel #coronavirus was lab-made.

Truth: Genetic science allows us to understand how and when viruses emerge. Analyses by trusted scientists clearly demonstrates that the virus occurred naturally. (2/x)
You can read the scientific paper@K_G_Andersen @scrippsresearch; @arambaut; W. Ian Lipkin; @ColumbiaMSPH; @edwardcholmes; & Robert F. Garry @Tulane here (3/x)
nature.com/articles/s4159…,
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(