Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
@Jikkyleaks
Jan 17, 2023 • 19 tweets • 10 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
New Cheese 🧀🧀🧀on #Blotgate - The emerging scandal that keeps on giving.
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents.
@chrismartenson

The paper that David is referring to is published as a "peer reviewed" paper in @JPharmSciences

Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
It has simply been reconstituted as a "peer reviewed" manuscript.

These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.

Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
The claims are that
(1) the mRNA has been isolated and characterized.

This is not true as no sequencing has been performed on the mRNA - the same mRNA "extras" identified in #humpgate

These humps with big red arrows
@Kevin_McKernan
and (2) that no additional (off-target) proteins are made because the mRNA that is in the product is truncated and unable to produce a protein product.

Again, not true based on this published data.
We saw this in #blotgate
So this paper - just published in January 2023 - is the exact same document as in the submissions to the EMA and FDA seen in the earlier threads.

Here is the #humpgate graph - the exact same one as the EMA document.
And the comedy Western blots are also the same. These as we saw are not Western blots at all but AWBs or "virtual blots". These are computer reconstructions that are easy to fake.

That's why papers are not normally accepted just based on AWBs.

This one was.
Those blots are meant to show that no other protein is made but simply show that no truncated spike protein is made (because they were only looking for spike protein fragments).

They did NOT exclude a different protein altogether.
There was in fact one genuine-looking Western blot in the whole paper, that was meant to show that no other proteins were being produced.

This one: https://jpharmsci.org/article/S0022-3549(23)00009-6/fulltextEMA Type II group of variations assessment report EMEA/H/C/0
The only problem is that the negative and positive controls were not specified, and there was only ever one of these produced - from one "special" batch not seen anywhere else.

They were meant to repeat this with 3 more batches. They didn't
So who was it exactly that produced this "peer reviewed paper"?

It was a Pfizerfest.
All Pfizer employees. Every single one.
The first author, Himakshi K Patel has no history on pubmed.gov so likely doesn't have a PhD.
The supervising author, Thomas F Lerch had a handful of first author papers prior to moving to Pfizer.

There are no university affiliations at all and no independent oversight of this paper.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lerch%2C…
Which means that Pfizer wrote their own holiday brochure.

Nobody checked the hotel.
And it's not just me - the EMA said they need to "further characterize the mRNA" in July 2021.

No further characterisations were done.
We said so, so it's true.

The paper was published in January 2023.
Which is interesting, because this paper was approved on the day of the submission of the revised document.

Which was two days after we first exposed #humpgate

What are the odds?
Of course, you should trust Pfizer to make the product, investigate the product, write the assessors' brochure for the product and monitor their own clinical trial for the product.

Why wouldn't you?
justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…

@JesslovesMJK @MidwesternDoc
More on this from @JesslovesMJK ....
For reference this is the EMA document
files.catbox.moe/sg745z.pdf

And here is the Pfizer (BioNtech) FDA response document
files.catbox.moe/egah0n.pdf

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jun 29
WHOA!

What @TheBurninBeard is saying here is that the clinical samples that had "COVID" also had gene signatures of Mycoplasma fermentans, a US military pathogen that can be used as a vector to carry viral clones.

@SabinehazanMD found it too.
🧵
#spraygate @BrokenTruthTV
Can you see that Norman Pieniazek, who headed up the CDC's research division at the time that the @CDCgov sent biological weapons to Iraq to start a war, took himself out of this thread?

Do you know why?
@SecKennedy does.

A layman friendly round up of the US biological weapons initiatives, including gulf war syndrome and the spraying of pathogens.

sott.net/article/155150…
Read 6 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jun 28
I am not sure which is the more damning.

@RWMaloneMD's incisive question because he knows that the @CDCFlu and DARPA keep the influenza gravy train running via GOFROC.

Or the uncomfortable silence from the rest of the "experts" at the end.
archive.md/IJJ0T x.com/Jikkyleaks/sta…
@RWMaloneMD @CDCFlu Nothing to see here
medschool.duke.edu/blog/weapon-ma…Image
@RWMaloneMD @CDCFlu Nothing to see here
#FluGate #ThanksDARPA
darpa.mil/news/2019/dose…Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Jun 26
"Not a single death. "

While everybody was being distracted by the Shah of Trumpran and RFK's wearables nobody actually noticed that the CDC's "public health" department is run by the US military with US military mentality in US military uniforms.

Here is 30 minutes of CAPTAIN Sarah Meyer gaslighting the US public.

If this doesn't make you angry it's likely nothing will.
"No deaths".
"All benefit".
"Don't worry about myocarditis" (which has a 10 year mortality of up to 50%).
Her lapdog Adam McNeil isn't even a doctor and blatantly lies about the net mortality benefit of the COVID vaccines, never seen in a single RCT.

The US military has been forcing experimental vaccines on their soldiers for ever, and they don't give a damn about what happens as a result because YOU will pay the bill.

And if a soldier dies they will just send another soldier to take the spouse a folded up flag. They do not care one iota that your rights to bodily autonomy were trampled on and people died, because they will tell you that nobody died.

And you will shut the hell up, peasant.

CAPTAIN Meyer was part of the ACIP committee that approved the Pfizer vaccine claiming that it reduced infections by 92%. She lied then and she's lying now - because if she admitted that people died, she would be responsible.

Is lying to the public as a commissioned officer treason, or just another reason for a pat on the back from the US military?

Another job done. Crisis averted. Nobody goes to jail. No grand juries. No courts martial.
Chin chin.
usphs.gov

@RetsefL @RWMaloneMD @MaryanneDemasi @Fynnderella1 @CharlesRixey @Kevin_McKernan @RMConservative @MdBreathe @DrJBhattacharya
Except she didn't apologize - for the deaths and adverse events.
Neither did the @CDCgov
Nor did the @US_FDA.

The @usphscc medical symbol is the false caduceus and is claimed by some to be intentionally a misdirection of medicine.

@ClareCraigPath pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC44…Image
Image
ICYMI
drclarecraig.substack.com/p/doctor-docto…Image
Read 4 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 28
POLL:

Do you think Francesca Gino was set up by Dan Ariely at Harvard for leverage over her silence on what actually happened during COVID in Italy?

#GinoGate
Ariely, known to have a history of research fraud, self declaring here that he was working for the "Israeli government" during COVID.

Nudgestock. The psychology of nudging you into doing what the government and pharma corporations want.

Protected?
Here is Dan Ariely again telling you to wear a mask and get vaccinated.

A psychologist working for the Israeli government. At Duke University.

Ariely kissed the ring.
@francescagino had to be thrown to the wolves.

#Ginogate
Read 5 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 2
"Look over here not there"

HPV vaccine "success" explained in one chart.

Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.

But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.

For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.

@DrSuzanneH7
@MaryanneDemasi
@DrJulieSladden
@DrJBhattacharya
@missyTHX1138
@stkirsch
@SecKennedyImage
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.

Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout Image
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout.
cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…Image
Read 4 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Apr 23
This is the psychopathic research group from the UK that has just decided to fly planes into the clouds to block out the sun.

Crazy scientists like this have killed tens of millions in the last century.

DARPA killed the ozone layer in 1958.
This mob includes Nathan Wolfe.
A reminder. Nathan Wolfe is Metabiota. The Clinton's conduit for biological weapons manufature.
arkmedic.info/p/actuaries-inc
DARPA is run by literal Lysenkoist psychopaths and needs to be shut down before it destroys the world with its psychotic schemes.

The hole in the ozone layer was first seen after Operation Argus, when DARPA blew it up.

No, I'm not kidding.
newscientist.com/article/212533…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(