New Cheese 🧀🧀🧀on #Blotgate - The emerging scandal that keeps on giving.
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents. @chrismartenson
The paper that David is referring to is published as a "peer reviewed" paper in @JPharmSciences
Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
It has simply been reconstituted as a "peer reviewed" manuscript.
These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.
Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
The claims are that (1) the mRNA has been isolated and characterized.
This is not true as no sequencing has been performed on the mRNA - the same mRNA "extras" identified in #humpgate
and (2) that no additional (off-target) proteins are made because the mRNA that is in the product is truncated and unable to produce a protein product.
Again, not true based on this published data.
We saw this in #blotgate
So this paper - just published in January 2023 - is the exact same document as in the submissions to the EMA and FDA seen in the earlier threads.
Here is the #humpgate graph - the exact same one as the EMA document.
And the comedy Western blots are also the same. These as we saw are not Western blots at all but AWBs or "virtual blots". These are computer reconstructions that are easy to fake.
That's why papers are not normally accepted just based on AWBs.
This one was.
Those blots are meant to show that no other protein is made but simply show that no truncated spike protein is made (because they were only looking for spike protein fragments).
They did NOT exclude a different protein altogether.
There was in fact one genuine-looking Western blot in the whole paper, that was meant to show that no other proteins were being produced.
This one:
The only problem is that the negative and positive controls were not specified, and there was only ever one of these produced - from one "special" batch not seen anywhere else.
They were meant to repeat this with 3 more batches. They didn't
So who was it exactly that produced this "peer reviewed paper"?
It was a Pfizerfest.
All Pfizer employees. Every single one.
The first author, Himakshi K Patel has no history on pubmed.gov so likely doesn't have a PhD.
The supervising author, Thomas F Lerch had a handful of first author papers prior to moving to Pfizer.
There are no university affiliations at all and no independent oversight of this paper.
Which means that Pfizer wrote their own holiday brochure.
Nobody checked the hotel.
And it's not just me - the EMA said they need to "further characterize the mRNA" in July 2021.
No further characterisations were done.
We said so, so it's true.
The paper was published in January 2023.
Which is interesting, because this paper was approved on the day of the submission of the revised document.
Which was two days after we first exposed #humpgate
What are the odds?
Of course, you should trust Pfizer to make the product, investigate the product, write the assessors' brochure for the product and monitor their own clinical trial for the product.
🧵If you have decided after 48 hours that "The Israelis did it" you have not only fallen for the deep state's playbook again... but you probably think that Ashley Babbitt was killed by a movie gunshot to the shoulder.
Stop falling for the narratives.
[credit: @wooz_news ]
For the record the official cause of death was listed as "gunshot wound to the left anterior shoulder". This is not possible as the cause of death of the woman in the video as portrayed.
Instantaneous death as portrayed in the Babbitt video cannot happen with a gunshot to the shoulder as it does not involve the spinal cord or brain.
There are also no major vessels to bleed out (which would take a while) other than the subclavian. If that bled out enough to cause mortality there would be a bloodbath.
The Wooz news video confirms the lack of bleeding.
Y'all understand what antimicrobial stewardship is don't you?
And why these zealots were responsible for potentially millions of COVID deaths because they didn't want to treat post viral pneumonia with antibiotics.
To be clear it was the "antimicrobial stewardship" people that were responsible for telling you that if your pneumonia happened after a positive COVID test youcan't have antibiotics.
@SenRonJohnson @RWMaloneMD The tweet now not visible (because he just deleted his account) was Jake Scott telling you how bad azithromycin is (it isn't, when you have pneumonia)
Because @realDonaldTrump has shown a chink in his "best vaccine ever" narrative the deep state is in panic mode so are rolling out the limited hangouts.
See next tweet for explanation.
This "reveal" from David Martin is not what it seems
David Martin sounds knowledgeable - and he is - but his sensationalism is intentional because it will be dismissed by the people who need to be persuaded. He will occupy your time with patent drivel and nothing new will emerge.
It's intentional because that's his role
Just like Stew Peters, Sasha Latypova, Jane Ruby, Ana Mihalcea, Mike Yeadon, Joe Sansone and a few others with the "graphene in the jabs" "viruses don't exist" "jabs are bioweapons" rhetoric.
It's intended to sound crazy.
It's a smart move because there is underlying truth
The Pharma lobby group BIO admitting to using "conservative" lobby groups to attempt to oust @SecKennedy to keep the vaccine industry alive.
Important highlights:
⭐️Targeting @DrMakaryFDA to "rebuild FDA capacity"
⭐️Target @AEI via Scott Gottlieb and @DLA_Piper via Richard Burr
⭐️Help build trust in vaccines (what happened to the trust?)
⭐️Investors are leaving vaccine investment
⭐️Vaccines are the #1 priority at BIO
⭐️National security commission Biotech report a way in to sell product
⭐️$2m to be spent on "vaccine programs"
⭐️"More productive to target Makary and Trump Insiders vs RFK Jr"
Remember that BIO are the organisation that funded and organised the @shotsheard harassment group that target doctors for deregistration (e.g. @mdbreathe and @drcole12) if they publish genuine safety concerns about pharma products.
Links below.
Social media targeting, harassment and blackmail is absolutely securities fraud. law.justia.com/codes/us/2002/… and others
@SECGov @FBIDirectorKash do your job.
Remember that the BIO lobby group Shots Heard - which targeted doctors and scientists to blackmail them into silence over COVID vaccines - included people like Viki Male, Kevin Ault (ACIP), David Gorski and Dorit Reiss.