Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
@Jikkyleaks
Jan 17, 2023 • 19 tweets • 10 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
New Cheese 🧀🧀🧀on #Blotgate - The emerging scandal that keeps on giving.
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents.
@chrismartenson

The paper that David is referring to is published as a "peer reviewed" paper in @JPharmSciences

Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
It has simply been reconstituted as a "peer reviewed" manuscript.

These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.

Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
The claims are that
(1) the mRNA has been isolated and characterized.

This is not true as no sequencing has been performed on the mRNA - the same mRNA "extras" identified in #humpgate

These humps with big red arrows
@Kevin_McKernan
and (2) that no additional (off-target) proteins are made because the mRNA that is in the product is truncated and unable to produce a protein product.

Again, not true based on this published data.
We saw this in #blotgate
So this paper - just published in January 2023 - is the exact same document as in the submissions to the EMA and FDA seen in the earlier threads.

Here is the #humpgate graph - the exact same one as the EMA document.
And the comedy Western blots are also the same. These as we saw are not Western blots at all but AWBs or "virtual blots". These are computer reconstructions that are easy to fake.

That's why papers are not normally accepted just based on AWBs.

This one was.
Those blots are meant to show that no other protein is made but simply show that no truncated spike protein is made (because they were only looking for spike protein fragments).

They did NOT exclude a different protein altogether.
There was in fact one genuine-looking Western blot in the whole paper, that was meant to show that no other proteins were being produced.

This one: https://jpharmsci.org/article/S0022-3549(23)00009-6/fulltextEMA Type II group of variations assessment report EMEA/H/C/0
The only problem is that the negative and positive controls were not specified, and there was only ever one of these produced - from one "special" batch not seen anywhere else.

They were meant to repeat this with 3 more batches. They didn't
So who was it exactly that produced this "peer reviewed paper"?

It was a Pfizerfest.
All Pfizer employees. Every single one.
The first author, Himakshi K Patel has no history on pubmed.gov so likely doesn't have a PhD.
The supervising author, Thomas F Lerch had a handful of first author papers prior to moving to Pfizer.

There are no university affiliations at all and no independent oversight of this paper.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=lerch%2C…
Which means that Pfizer wrote their own holiday brochure.

Nobody checked the hotel.
And it's not just me - the EMA said they need to "further characterize the mRNA" in July 2021.

No further characterisations were done.
We said so, so it's true.

The paper was published in January 2023.
Which is interesting, because this paper was approved on the day of the submission of the revised document.

Which was two days after we first exposed #humpgate

What are the odds?
Of course, you should trust Pfizer to make the product, investigate the product, write the assessors' brochure for the product and monitor their own clinical trial for the product.

Why wouldn't you?
justice.gov/opa/pr/justice…

@JesslovesMJK @MidwesternDoc
More on this from @JesslovesMJK ....
For reference this is the EMA document
files.catbox.moe/sg745z.pdf

And here is the Pfizer (BioNtech) FDA response document
files.catbox.moe/egah0n.pdf

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 2
"Look over here not there"

HPV vaccine "success" explained in one chart.

Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.

But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.

For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.

@DrSuzanneH7
@MaryanneDemasi
@DrJulieSladden
@DrJBhattacharya
@missyTHX1138
@stkirsch
@SecKennedyImage
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.

Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout Image
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout.
cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…Image
Read 4 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Apr 23
This is the psychopathic research group from the UK that has just decided to fly planes into the clouds to block out the sun.

Crazy scientists like this have killed tens of millions in the last century.

DARPA killed the ozone layer in 1958.
This mob includes Nathan Wolfe.
A reminder. Nathan Wolfe is Metabiota. The Clinton's conduit for biological weapons manufature.
arkmedic.info/p/actuaries-inc
DARPA is run by literal Lysenkoist psychopaths and needs to be shut down before it destroys the world with its psychotic schemes.

The hole in the ozone layer was first seen after Operation Argus, when DARPA blew it up.

No, I'm not kidding.
newscientist.com/article/212533…
Read 7 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Apr 18
Please understand how important this is.

Two major papers showed that the COVID vaccine spike protein causes cancer by suppression of p53.

The authors of both have been threatened into retracting their papers by pharma groups tied to the NIH.

That's why it's called #NIHgate
Exhibit A
arkmedic.info/p/welcome-to-g…
Exhibit B
brokentruth.com/nihgate
Read 8 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Apr 17
Imagine a company so large that they can recruit thousands of "experts" yet you've never heard of them.

And imagine that those recruited scientists include agents of #PubpeerGate whose job is to silence other scientists.

@secgov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Image
@SECGov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Wow so this company is claiming influence with 11,000 scientists and multiple links lead back to pharma and the gene therapy corporations.

Broad institute. Who could have guessed?
#pubpeergate

putassoc.com/about-us/meet-…Image
Image
Image
Image
Inizio aka Inizio Putnam aka PHMR - the largest company you have never heard of.

Why?
They don't want you to know they are the chief influencers to indoctrinate doctors and the public into accepting failed pharma products.

putassoc.com/our-expertise/…
Read 6 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Feb 23
WHOA!!! 🧀

@Yale could be up to their necks in the biggest HIPAA scandal since @UChicago

This is how the scam appears to have worked.

Harlan Krumholz owns a patent for managing health data through an app. "Hugo health" was the middle man providing the app to bait people claiming to be vaccine injured to join a study called LISTEN. But it was essentially being run on behalf of Pfizer/Janssen who paid him $3m in "research grants".

Thousands of injured signed up but only 241 patients were used in the "study" of which the publications were irrelevant and showed nothing other than "the vaccines saved millions of lives" bla bla. Nothing helpful for the vaccine injured at all.

But the bombshell - the data that they provided was able to be sold off to anyone they wanted to. It was in the consent form that most people didn't read. The data was held on hugo.health which has now gone. It was NOT HIPAA compliant.

How did we know that hugo.health's servers were not HIPAA compliant?

Yale told the participants in a email in July 2024 (attached).

So where did all that health data go?

Was it sold off to the highest bidder or used in a blackmail campaign against vulnerable people who were vaccine injured and couldn't work? (Like those that have targeted our accounts recently)

We don't know. But you can be damn sure that Yale knows, and took secret action to remedy the situation having already taken millions of dollars from pharma to run studies that undermined the vaccine injured.

That is why there is so much animosity suddenly being directed at the vaccine injured. They want to bury this story.

Yale could be in very big trouble.
They deserve a hashtag.
#YaleGate

@RobertKennedyJr @SECGov @AGHuff @chrismartenson

Patent:
patents.justia.com/inventor/harla…
Pubmed showing over 1000 papers (not possible for a clinician researcher writing his own papers):
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=krumholz…
LISTEN studies:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=krumholz…Image
Image
Image
@Yale @UChicago For those confused, please understand what a "limited hangout" is here. While you are rejoicing on the scraps of Daily Mail fodder, the pharma companies' new narrative is enshrined by those very articles.

"Injuries are very rare but it was worth it"

Getting more information about this pharma honeypot.

$2m to Iwasaki.

How much more pharmaceutical net went into this group to push boosters?

Image
Read 5 tweets
Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
Dec 12, 2024
@jsm2334 I have 3 new questions:
1⃣ why didn't you appear on the Razzaghi paper using your data?
2⃣ is your data synthetic?
3⃣ what is the binomial probability that 18/20 of a university's research team come from a group that comprises 2% of the US population, if all groups are equal? Image
Image
@jsm2334 For those confused... The original thread on #OHDSI - the data curators claiming an impossible 96% efficacy rate for a type-mismatched vaccine against infection - is here.

This is not their first rodeo in synthetic data

#EMRgate #Surgisphere

@jsm2334 And there we are.
Kevin Haynes confirming that @OHDSI is run by Johnson & Johnson (AKA Janssen).
youtube.com/watch?v=lEYmH0…
x.com/Jikkyleaks/sta…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(