Let's do a small thread on D-Branes and their charges. Before starting, let's review some familiar concepts so that it is easy to understand what follows. 1/13 #Physics#SciComm#Dbrane#strings#research
In electrodynamics (using Newtonian space and time) the magnetic field is represented by a vector potential A. In order to describe the electric field, we need another scalar quantity called the scalar potential. 2/13
In special relativity, the scalar & the vector potentials can be combined into a vector potential but this potential is a four-vector. This potential which has one index is called a 1-form (or one-form). 3/13
We can think of this potential as the electromagnetic (EM) field (knowing this potential gives us the electrical and magnetic fields). This field can influence an object only if that object has an electrical charge (or in principle, magnetic charge) 4/13
We know that the (fundamental) objects (in 4D spacetime) that carry electrical charge are point particles (in other words, point particles are 'sources' of EM fields). All the other things that carry electric charge are made up of particles and aren't fundamental.
5/13
Now we can have a generalized version of the vector potential which we call p-forms i.e. they are mathematical objects with p indices (a technical but unimportant point here is that these objects should be antisymmetric in all the indices). 6/13
Particles have no spatial extent i.e. they have 0 space dimensions. They're sources of a 1-form field (i.e. EM field). Objects with p space dimensions are sources of a (p+1)-form field e.g. a string has 1 space dimension and thus, it should be the source of a 2-form field. 7/13
Let's talk about type II A & type II B string theory. Both have a 2-form field called the Kalb-Ramond field or simply, the B field. The fundamental strings are sources of this B-field. Both of these theories also contain additional p-form fields called the RR fields. 8/13
Type II A has 1,3,5,7 and 9-form RR fields. So, in this theory, we must've objects with 0,2,4,6, and 8 dimensions which're sources of these fields. These objects are the Dp branes. A Dp brane has p space dimensions. So, type II theory must have D0, D2, D4, D6, and D8 branes. 9/13
Similarly, type II B has a 0-form, 2-form, 4-form, 6-form, 8-form, and 10-form RR fields. Therefore in this theory, we must have objects with -1,1,3,5,7 and 9 dimensions which are sources of these fields. These sources are D(-1), D1, D3, D5, D7 and D9 branes. 10/13
D(-1) might look nonsense but it is a sensible object called the D instanton. The p in Dp brane can also be seen as (spacetime dimension of the brane) -1. This is again the number of space dimensions but if spacetime dimension=0 (which is true for instanton), then p=-1. 11/13
The branes discussed above are the stable D branes in the type II theories. They're stable as they carry RR charges and they must be conserved (e.g. an electrically charged particle can't decay without leaving anything because that'll violate electric charge conservation). 12/13
There are some branes in string theory and M theory that I didn't talk about. These include NS5 brane (which has magnetic charge under the Kalb-Ramond field), M2 brane, and M5 brane (which are found in M theory). M2 & M5 carry electric and magnetic charges respectively. 13/13
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is a post to describe how we construct the standard model lagrangian and generate the masses for gauge bosons and fermions. I will assume basic familiarity with QFT, lagrangians, gauge transformations, and gauge groups (like U(1), and SU(2)).
1/65
#physics #scicomm
Recall that the mass term of a scalar field φ is simply proportional to φ2. Vector fields have similar mass terms. For fermions, the mass term is written in terms of their left handed part and right handed part. All of these forms are given in the picture below.
2/65
#physics
Also, recall that in gauge theories, we can’t add explicit mass terms in the lagrangian because these terms will violate the gauge invariance of the action (actions should be gauge invariant).
3/65
#physics #scicomm
In this post, we will go through the reasoning that gives us the Schwarzchild solution of Einstein field equations. Prerequisites for this post include familiarity with Einstein field equations.
1/23
#physics #scicomm
We start with the Einstein field equation (EFE) and convert it to a form that is used to solve this equation. This form is called the trace reversed form and to derive it, we contract EFE with the metric tensor.
2/23
#physics #scicomm
Now, we specialize to the case of the Schwarzchild metric which is the metric of an eternal, electrically neutral, and non-rotating black hole of mass M. This means that the metric tensor will be independent of time, and it will be spherically symmetric.
3/23
#physics #scicomm
In this small thread, I will show why the first few possible corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action are the way they are. Basic familiarity with General Relativity is assumed. 🧵
1/31
#physics #scicomm
I will use the natural units (units used in high-energy physics) in this article. In these units, the unit of length is the inverse of the unit of energy (i.e. [Length]=[Energy]^(-1)).
2/31
#physics #scicomm
If you aren’t familiar with natural units, just take this fact at face value and you won’t be needing any more familiarity with them for this article.
3/31
#physics #scicomm
This is a long thread for a chapter-by-chapter review and a reading guide for volume 1 of Polchinski’s book on string theory. Familiarity with the basics of QFT and GR is required (you will need these pre-requisites to read the book anyway)
1/69
#physics #scicomm
A guide to this review
This is a review and a reading guide for Polchinski’s first volume. Polchinski’s two volumes on string theory are still considered to be the best and most comprehensive resources to learn string theory.
2/69
#physics #scicomm
Although they were written in the late 90s, they are still the first choice of many string theorists. In this post, I will review the first volume chapter by chapter. The review of volume 2 will be done later.
3/69
This post summarizes the reasoning that goes into deriving Einstein’s field equation. There is more than one way to derive this field equation but I will focus on the most conventional path to derive it. 1/28
#Physics #scicomm
For this post, a basic understanding of tensor analysis and special relativity is assumed to understand this post. 2/28
#Physics #scicomm
What we need is an equation that relates “how spacetime curves” to “how matter and energy exist and move” in spacetime. So, one side of the equation should be the “geometric” side and one side should be the “matter” side. 3/28
#Physics #scicomm
This is a post about the generalization of the concept of global symmetries. This area has been a very active area of research for the last 8 years or so. 1/28
#Physics #scicomm #research
A basic understanding of global symmetries unitary operators (acting on quantum states and operators) and local operators is required to read this post. This topic may look esoteric but it has applications in well-known theories of physics, including the standard model. 2/28
In Quantum Mech, if we have a global symmetry, it acts on the states as unitary operators. These operators must be unitary to conserve the total probability equal to 1. The state of a system is defined at a particular time; thus, so does the operator acting on this state. 3/28