But it all unravels when you look at the same group in the next dose study, where the same groups of people are trying to sell the "n+1" dose as the one you need.
It's snake oil
But snake oil + pregnancy -> thalidomide.
Viki and Kev don't care, they've had their children.
In response to "epidemiologist" @crabb_vicki (who has a total of zero first or last author papers on pubmed)
And just to prove the point that it is not possible that a "vaccine" that does not prevent disease prevents death from a disease that it does not prevent...
Who cares about these deaths? It's not the people pushing this #WVE, that's for sure.
Every vaccine scientist will try to convince you that the drop in u25 cancers was due to the vaccine when it was merely due to the change in screening.
But check out the HUGE RISE in 25+ cancers. This pattern is repeated in Scotland and Australia where similar changes to the screening age were made a few years after the introduction of coerced vaccination, obfuscating the figures to hide a scandalous rise in 25-29 age cervical cancers after the vaccine rollout.
For clarity most cancers in this age group are early and detected on screening before they become advanced. Moving the screening age meant that they were diagnosed later and therefore in an older age bracket.
The big red arrow is pointing to the preinvasive diagnoses which tend to mirror the actual cancers - the upper chart was too busy.
Here is the same from the OP with arrows showing both cancer (above) and precancer (below) which both rose significantly after the vaccine rollout
And here is the same data from Cancer Research UK (smoothed) showing a doubling of cancer rates in the over 25s for at least 5 years after the vaccine rollout. cancerresearchuk.org/health-profess…
@SECGov @Kevin_McKernan @SabinehazanMD Wow so this company is claiming influence with 11,000 scientists and multiple links lead back to pharma and the gene therapy corporations.
Broad institute. Who could have guessed?
#pubpeergate