Andrew Tate, Judge’s Ruling and Human Trafficking/Loverboy
I have reviewed the allegations against the Tates and they do not stand up to scrutiny. I am still surprised that they were arrested based on the lack of evidence in this case
We hear a lot about the loverboy method & the Romanians trying to convict the Tates based on this method.
But this is not correct, the broad definition when taken in isolation can be used to convict anyone. Heck you could reverse it and claim catfishing is a lovergirl method. /2
Loverboy is an aspect of human trafficking. Alone it’s not a crime & that's why the judge didn't refer to it in his 9 pg Judgment
1. Loverboy 2. HumanTrafficking
In a case, 2 is important & 1 is merely used to prove 2. You can convict solely on 2 but not solely based on 1. /3
UN definition: “Human Trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of people through force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them for profit.”
So the main point from this definition is the question, what is exploitation? /4
It’s not defined, but Marija Javonich provided 3 aspects:
(1) abuse of vulnerability (2) excessive gain (3) sustained action
In my view the US woman doesn’t fulfil any of the 3, let alone all 3
The Moldovan doesn’t fit (2) and we need more information to decide (1) & (3) /5
We know for US woman:
(1) Doesn’t apply as she's from the US, a 1st world country
(2) Doesn’t apply as she didn’t do cam-work for them & according to the judicial documents she was paid upkeep
(3) Doesn’t apply as she was there briefly
So US woman was NOT Human Trafficked. /6
As for Moldovan woman based on the judicial documents she does not fit (2).
As the US woman said she was told by Tates' people she would be living with women, and the Moldovan, who she claimed were sharing profits with the Tates
So the Moldovan woman wasn't Human Trafficked. /7
Some people refer to the Tates website where they explain how they get women to join the Webcam business but they deliberately ignore the most crucial words “we will get rich TOGETHER”.
This means that the statement does not fit into (2), and is NOT human trafficking. /8
But what about the other 4 women?
First, 2 of the women have come out on Romanian and UK TV claiming that the Romanian prosecutor has decided they are ‘Victims’ when they are not victims
They have also been interviews by the BBC. It is quite strange
This is important because the Prosecutor is relying on the press to paint the Tates in a bad light.
If the leaks are their best evidence then there's NO CASE!
So they're using it just for perception of guilt.
Any other evidence the judge has said isn't enough to prosecute. /15
We know the Judge was biased, he approved the seizing of assets worth about 5m when the civil claim isn't even 0.1% of it.
The Defence were only given 45 mins to prepare a case. Tates' lawyers were meant to have case within 10 days it’s now been 20.
Still no case files! /16
Are you expecting a fair trial?
After going through the documents I have to agree with the judge that even with the wiretap there isn’t enough evidence to prosecute let alone convict
So why is this circus of a 'criminal investigation' still ongoing?
I will let you decide! /17
What should be of concern to any upstanding citizen is that the Judge has already acted in a manner that appears to be nefarious and bias.
Based on the above can we trust him?
I think not! /18
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The police said ‘we acknowledge there were some delays to the investigations… “The case was only closed in late 2019 after a case file had been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service and they took the decision not to prosecute.”
Liberals have convinced everyone that Meghan is a black woman. In her case, mixed heritage makes criticism of her 'hate speech' but for Tate there are no rules.
Is one a black person if they obey but not if they disobey?
Black mens penises have been fetishised by sexually paranoid white racists since forever. It's no surprise then to find the 'liberal' & 'anti racist' press such as the 'i' and Guardian gleefully celebrating a white woman mocking a black mans genitalia. theguardian.com/commentisfree/… /3