Andrew Tate, Judge’s Ruling and Human Trafficking/Loverboy

I have reviewed the allegations against the Tates and they do not stand up to scrutiny. I am still surprised that they were arrested based on the lack of evidence in this case

Let’s review the evidence /1

#FreeTopGs
We hear a lot about the loverboy method & the Romanians trying to convict the Tates based on this method.

But this is not correct, the broad definition when taken in isolation can be used to convict anyone. Heck you could reverse it and claim catfishing is a lovergirl method. /2
Loverboy is an aspect of human trafficking. Alone it’s not a crime & that's why the judge didn't refer to it in his 9 pg Judgment

1. Loverboy
2. HumanTrafficking

In a case, 2 is important & 1 is merely used to prove 2. You can convict solely on 2 but not solely based on 1. /3
UN definition: “Human Trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of people through force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them for profit.”

So the main point from this definition is the question, what is exploitation? /4
It’s not defined, but Marija Javonich provided 3 aspects:

(1) abuse of vulnerability
(2) excessive gain
(3) sustained action

In my view the US woman doesn’t fulfil any of the 3, let alone all 3

The Moldovan doesn’t fit (2) and we need more information to decide (1) & (3) /5
We know for US woman:

(1) Doesn’t apply as she's from the US, a 1st world country

(2) Doesn’t apply as she didn’t do cam-work for them & according to the judicial documents she was paid upkeep

(3) Doesn’t apply as she was there briefly

So US woman was NOT Human Trafficked. /6
As for Moldovan woman based on the judicial documents she does not fit (2).

As the US woman said she was told by Tates' people she would be living with women, and the Moldovan, who she claimed were sharing profits with the Tates

So the Moldovan woman wasn't Human Trafficked. /7
Some people refer to the Tates website where they explain how they get women to join the Webcam business but they deliberately ignore the most crucial words “we will get rich TOGETHER”.

This means that the statement does not fit into (2), and is NOT human trafficking. /8
But what about the other 4 women?

First, 2 of the women have come out on Romanian and UK TV claiming that the Romanian prosecutor has decided they are ‘Victims’ when they are not victims

They have also been interviews by the BBC. It is quite strange

/9
If this is the case then we have maybe 2 or even 0 women, and the entire case rests on the US & Moldovan women.

No one has provided any info on which women acuse of trafficking.

Here is a video of the US & Moldovan women partying with their phones:
/10
What’s the Judge’s view?

Pg 3 of the Judicial Ruling says evidence on trafficking is:

1. Witness Statement
2. Psych Report
3. Wiretap

Pg 2 Judge: "there's reasonable suspicion that the defendant committed crimes of organised criminal group in relation to Human trafficking" /11
As explained in the previous thread. Pg 4 explains 3 levels of evidence.

Reasonable suspicion falls in 1.

1. To refer to court to remand
2. To prosecute
3. To convict

The evidence only meets 1, according to the Judge

There’s not enough evidence to prosecute or convict. /12
The wiretap leaks to the press show the Judiciary, Prosecutor & Press have an incestous relationship.

We should be concerned.

As for the leaks they're weak and don't meet conditions of Human Trafficking.

It’s why the judge said they need more evidence to prosecute. /13
We saw this relationship when DIICOT raided the Tate’s home on 29 December.

The press were there with their equipment ready to shoot the arrest and the raid.

Is that normal in organised crime cases?

Answer is no! Well, unless….

/14
This is important because the Prosecutor is relying on the press to paint the Tates in a bad light.

If the leaks are their best evidence then there's NO CASE!

So they're using it just for perception of guilt.

Any other evidence the judge has said isn't enough to prosecute. /15
We know the Judge was biased, he approved the seizing of assets worth about 5m when the civil claim isn't even 0.1% of it.
The Defence were only given 45 mins to prepare a case. Tates' lawyers were meant to have case within 10 days it’s now been 20.

Still no case files! /16
Are you expecting a fair trial?

After going through the documents I have to agree with the judge that even with the wiretap there isn’t enough evidence to prosecute let alone convict

So why is this circus of a 'criminal investigation' still ongoing?

I will let you decide! /17
What should be of concern to any upstanding citizen is that the Judge has already acted in a manner that appears to be nefarious and bias.

Based on the above can we trust him?

I think not! /18

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sulaiman Ahmed

Sulaiman Ahmed Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShaykhSulaiman

Jan 11
Andrew Tate, Judges Ruling on Rape

I have reviewed the allegation against the Tates & it's very weak. I'm surprised that they were arrested.

Romanian Authorities have gone in, without there being much substance behind the arrest.

But, let’s review the evidence /1
There are 2 accounts of rape by the Moldovan woman. She has left the country. There is no info on where she is.

I wonder if she has been given asylum in the US? If that’s the case, it seems a bit suspicious.

If not then let’s move onto the rest of the evidence. /2
What evidence is there?

Just the Witness Statement of the Moldovan woman.

According to Tates' lawyer both her and the US woman also went to a non-approved specialist for an evaluation after they left.

In reality other than the woman’s statements there is no evidence. /3
Read 8 tweets
Jan 9
MSM gives Harry the Tate Treatment

I'm no fan of Harry but he is yet another character assassination of 'The Matrix' for not towing the line.

Just like Tate & Assange.

In 2013, Harry was a war hero. His ‘kills’ were lauded by MSM.

#HarryisaDisgrace we hear!

#FreeTopG /1 Image
Political spectrum doesn't matter, if you dare speak against 'The Matrix' - you will be burned!

See how Harry is no longer the ‘Warrior Prince’?

Now he's an ‘Evil Killer’?

Complete Hypocrisy

bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-the… /2
They stoked Global outrage, with army vets attacking Harry for exposing their brutal killings in the illegal invasion of Afghanistan.

Amongst their 'reasons' for attacking him we find their claim that he's endangering soldiers /3 Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 7
Vice and Andrew Tate

Vice produced a Hit-Piece on the Tate brothers.

In this Hit they claim that Andrew Tate chocked a woman and raped one.

They allege that the UK police’s delays caused the CPS to drop the investigation.

Let’s see the veracity of the claims. /1

#FreeTopG
There were long delays, it took 4 years for the case to go to the CPS, who review evidence and decide merit.

Delays are hard for victims but also for the innocent who is accused. The police accept there were delays.

Did this impact the case?

vice.com/en/article/bvm… image /2
The police said ‘we acknowledge there were some delays to the investigations… “The case was only closed in late 2019 after a case file had been sent to the Crown Prosecution Service and they took the decision not to prosecute.”

So the CPS decided not to prosecute but why? /3
Read 15 tweets
Jan 5
Greta, Tate and Racism

Greta represents the apex of liberalism. She is a white, blonde woman. She can do no wrong.

For liberals, racism by Greta, a white woman, to Tate a black man, should be cheered, shared and reported.

Let’s look at this deep rooted racism /1

#FreeTopG Image
Liberals have convinced everyone that Meghan is a black woman. In her case, mixed heritage makes criticism of her 'hate speech' but for Tate there are no rules.

Is one a black person if they obey but not if they disobey?

andscape.com/features/megha… /2
Black mens penises have been fetishised by sexually paranoid white racists since forever. It's no surprise then to find the 'liberal' & 'anti racist' press such as the 'i' and Guardian gleefully celebrating a white woman mocking a black mans genitalia. theguardian.com/commentisfree/… /3
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(