India-Israel Joint attack on Pakistan Nuclear Facility [Thread]
(Based on True events)
India has outmatched Pakistan in every other department from the conventional military to the economy but this is one of the few where Indian couldn't beat Pakistan. -1/17
The Jets in the #MissionMajnu trailer reminded me of this most significant but unpopular event of the 1980s. India conducted nuclear tests in 1974 which jeopardized security of the region because of imbalance of power. President Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto authorized the project -2/17
establishing the foundations of Pakistan's most critical, crucial and consequential program. Meanwhile, In 1980 Israel adopted begin Doctrine under which it will not allow any enemy country to obtain nuclear weapons. It focused on carrying out preventive strikes against -3
nuclear facilities under a counter-proliferation policy. At that time Pakistan's overwhelming support for the Palestinian cause and to Arab world during the Arab-Israel placed Pakistan in the category of enemies of Israel. Under the begin Doctrine IDF carried out air raids -4
on the Iraqi Nuclear facility in Osiraq, Iraq in 1981. Israel planned to carry out similar strikes on Pakistan's nuclear facility located in Kahuta, Punjab, Pakistan. Kahuta was close to the Indian border and the lack of air defence put Pakistan in a bad security situation -5
based on a 1979 report by then PAF Air Chief Anwar Shamim and President Zia ul Haq advised PAF to strategies a counter-retaliatory strike on India’s nuclear research facilities in Trombay. For that PAF needed new aircraft and selected F-16, due to USSR-USA conflict -6
President Zia was able to get the deal done for new F-16 Fighter Jets. Pakistan received 2x F-16A and 4x F-16 B in early 1983. Meanwhile on the other side of the theatre, In Feb 1983 Indian officials travelled to Israel to discuss strategy and plan to neutralise the threat of -7
Pakistan going nuclear. On 25 February 1983, Indian prime minister Indira Gandhi accused Pakistan of covertly attempting to make nuclear weapons. After months-long consultation Plan was finally designed under which -8
6x IsAF F-16s and a few F-15s will be shifted from Haifa over the southern Arabian Sea into Jamnagar, Gujrat, Punjab, India.
The IsAF F-16 strike and F-15 CAP aircraft would then move from Jamnagar into Udhampur where previously IsAF C-17s would waiting -9
with a cargo of deep penetration and detonation weapons. With the Himalayas, aircraft would enter Pakistan air space in combat formations to deceive the radars. In March 1984, Indian PM Indira Gandhi signed off the Israeli-led operation targeting Pakistan's nuclear facility -10
But before the mission, Pakistani Intel picked up the plan. President Zia authorized counter-retaliatory strikes on Indian Bhabha Nuclear Plant, Trombay and the Israeli nuclear plant at Negev. The message was also sent to world capitals including Tel Aviv and Dehli. -11
that Pakistan will retaliate and the result would be devastating. State Department also received credible intel reports containing satellite images then State Department sent a msg to both not to carry out air raids against the nuclear facility, which also left India with -12
little space for the operation. But one of the messages to Dehli was sent through the Former head of PAEC and Nuclear Physicist Munir Ahmad Khan. He is also cited as the "Father of Pakistan's nuclear program". Diplomat Abdul Sattar was briefed and later delivered the message -13
to Munir Ahmad Khan. During a conference on nuclear safety in Austria, Munir Ahmad Khan invited Indian physicist Raja Ramanna for a dinner at the Imperial Hotel where MA delivered the message about a possible retaliatory nuclear strike at Trombay. Raja Ramana delivered the -14
message directly to the Indian Prime Minister's Office. This was one of the reasons why President Zia used to respect and admire Munir Ahmad Khan despite his political tilt towards Bhutto/PPP. After the death of President Zia, Dehli and Tel Aviv again tried to pull this off -15
then PM Benazir Bhutto passed the same orders of retaliatory strikes to COAS Aslam Baig. (Will write separately on that). The change in power corridors did not introduce any change in the nuclear policy eventually Pakistan carried out nuclear tests on the 28th of May 1988.-16
References 1. “Deception: Pakistan, the United States, and the Secret Trade in Nuclear Weapons” by Adrian Levy 2. Compulsions of Power by Ashfaq Hussain 3. Kahuta by Saghir Iqbal 4. The war that never was by Ravi Rikhye 5. Sattar, A., Munir Ahmad Khan Memorial Reference, 2017
Here are a few additions to the objections. 1. Bharat Karnad has mentioned about C-17 either he has confused it with the C-130 or just randomly wrote about the jet. 2. The plot is evolving but the dates mentioned also have references and fit in with the timeline of events.
3. As for the F-16 and Mirage, the PAF chief is quoted as
“The Indian aircraft can reach the facility in three minutes whereas the PAF would take eight minutes,” said the air chief, “[This will] allow the Indians to attack the facility and return before the PAF can defend it.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Syria is a complex case. The majority of analyses are mostly from a geo-political perspective without taking into account Syria's internal dynamics. The problems are structural and go back even decades before Bashar Al-Assad.A refusal to acknowledge that
-1/n
the Syrians don't have agency. Understanding reactionary political movements is necessary to understand Syria and Iraq. Any totalitarian government with identity politics at its core would only form discriminatory policies towards those outside the ruling class.
-2/n
That's what happened in Syria and Iraq. Baathism revolved around Promoting a cult; a dictator, the only option. The power structure lacked political pluralism in a diverse country like Syria. For the past 50 years, Syria’s government has been dominated by members of the Alawite sect, who represent less than 10 percent of its population.
-3/n
Trump and Iran is the most relevant question today. Trump's cabinet would be full of Iran hawks. Three things would influence his actions
a. Iran Hawks in his Admin
b. Iran alleged involvement in his assassination plot
c. Vision for middle-east [Axis and Normalization]
-1/n
The indirect talks between Tehran and Washington were already called off last week. Trump admin will come with the policy of 'Maximum pressure' on Iran. Diplomatic manoeuvring would be limited. So what option does Iran have in an environment of regional escalation and
-2/n
emerging threats to its national security and sovereignty.
Iran needs to demonstrate its power to signal its current position in the regional order but also needs to establish deterrence in a rapidly changing security environment and regional dynamics.
-3/n
Sinwar [Thread]
Decapitation doesn't work with networked organizations such as Hamas. The majority are children of the camps [Refugees]. Even after decades of imprisonment, Sinwar opted for resistance instead of a different comfortable life. Even though Israel has
-1/n
Finally achieved one of its main objectives; the assassination of Yahya Sinwar, the brain behind the biggest disaster in the history of Israel. But this has induced a new dilemma. For months, Israel propagated that Sinwar is hiding in tunnels while keeping Hostages as
-2/n
Human Shield. Unexpectedly, he was assassinated, not in an Intelligence based operation in some underground facility but in a random encounter at the heart of the battlefield.Israel's intelligence and military capabilities to rescue hostages are still questionable!
-3/n
Iranian retaliation
[Intial analysis]
Iranian response was different in magnitude, scope, and quality than April [True Promise]. Less warning time, no use of drones or cruise missiles, and use of the latest missiles, including Hypersonic Fatah, instead of decades old.
-1/n
This means Iran meant real business; objective was not only demonstration of power but also impact. Unlike the previous attacks. That's why targets were all high-end, including the Nevatim. Delivering the message that nothing is safe, so don't think of retaliation.
-2/n
This was referred to as retaliation for Ismail Haniyeh, Hassan Nasrallah, and Abbas Nilforoushan; reaffirming that Iran would stand with "Axis" till the end and won't hesitate to directly assisting them in certain circumstances.
-3/n
Hezbollah's response [Thread]
Hezbollah's response to assassination of Fuad Shukr mirrors Iranian true promise operation, where the goal was demonstration of offensive capabilities rather than carrying out a high impact strike. In the normal circumstances, this could have
-1/n
Helped established deterence, but since it was unfolding in a volatile regional environment, it was not well received, especially when Israel considered it in relation to the existential war it is waging. Initially, Israel delivered the signal through Isfahan.
-2/n
Which was either downplayed or entirely ignored by IRGC. IRGC believed that true promise was enough to establish new rules of engagement, especially wrt IRGC officials, advisors, and mainland. These new Rules of Engagement (ROE) were totally unacceptable to Israel.
-3/n
Sinwar as Head of Hamas Political Bureau [Thread]
The appointment of Sinwar as head of political bureau, after the assassination of Haniyeh, might be surprising for many, but it is a strategic decision based on the security and political realities of the region and beyond. -1/n
When Hamas planned Al-Aqsa Flood (Oct 7), it knew it was a strategic manoeuvre having serious long-term implications, and there would be no coming back afterwards. One implication was the end of rapprochement with West and Gulf via the political bureau.
-2/n
especially when one of the objectives was to block US backed Arab-Israeli normalization having no Palestinian stakes. External pragmatism no longer offered any gains in the changing regional dynamics. Now it's just one package: "either you are with us or against us"
-3/n