Sr Adv Ramesh Gupta appears for Mishra.
Advocate Ankur Mahindro for the victim. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Judge: I want to know what the procedure is in a case like this.
Public Prosecutor: What has happened in this case is that they wrote to the airline and then an FIR was registered.
Gupta begins his submissions.
All offences are bailable here: Gupta. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Gupta: My bail was declined by the magistrate because it was observed that my conduct was not satisfactory. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Gupta: Initially my bail was also declined because the investigation was pending. Now that's done and they have examined other crew members and witnesses. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Judge asks PP if they have gone to the magistrate demanding police remand.
PP: No sir. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Gupta: They asked for reimbursement of the ticket and sought no action against me.
Judge: What are the sections invoked?
PP: He urinated on a senior citizen.
Judge: It may be disgusting that is another matter but let's not get into that. Let's go into how the law deals with it. First we need to see if the offence is 509 ipc or 354.
Judge: How do you make out 354 in this case.
PP reads section 354 ipc. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
PP: He had switched off all his mobile phones. We traced hi IMEI number. India ki international beizzati ho gayi hai sir.
Judge: How did he come to know that the FIR is registered.
PP: Through media.
Judge: How did the media come to know.
PP: It was everywhere sir.
Judge: Is he required for investigation now? The witness you have named is not deposing in your favour.
PP: Sir, he may influence. He contacted the victim even after the FIR was registered. #AirIndia#ShankarMishra
Validity of electoral bonds scheme : Supreme Court hear the case on the question whether petitions challenging the electoral bonds scheme need to be referred to Constitution Bench
Supreme Court is hearing plea by the father of a girl who was murdered in Bihar, filed against the Commissioner of Police, Delhi alleging delay in action by the authorities
Counsel: they say unknown body was found.. where in a day and age where even the thumb impression is fine to figure out who it is... #supremecourt
CJI DY Chandrachud: we can ask the Delhi police to inform if there was any wrongdoing or delay in working of the police.. tell me.. what did Delhi police do?
Counsel for Delhi police: our counter affidavit will explain in detail what steps were taken
PM Cares Fund is not created under the Constitution of India or by any law made by the Parliament or by any State Legislature, Centre government tells Delhi High Court. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund
In a detailed affidavit, the Centre has said that there is "no control of either the Central Government or any State Government/s, either direct or indirect, in functioning of the Trust in any manner whatsoever." #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund
The response states that the composition of the Board of Trustees consisting of holders of Public Office ex Officio is merely for administrative convenience and for smooth succession to the Trusteeship. #DelhiHighCourt#PMCaresFund
#SupremeCourt to hear Rana Ayyub's plea challenging the jurisdiction of the Ghaziabad court which commenced summons proceedings against her in a PMLA case
Ayyub contends that jurisdiction is of Mumbai, if at all @RanaAyyub
Adv Vrinda Grover: I have been probed and a complaint has been filed against me by ED regarding PMLA. I had raised funds by an online crowdfunding platform. Funds was transferred to Navi mumbai branch of HDFC bank @ketto@RanaAyyub
Grover: FIR in Ghaziabad was the trigger which was lodged at Indirapuram. This FIR has been annexed and weas lodged on September 7, 2021. It was lodged by Vikas S who is founding member of the Hindu IT Cell
#SupremeCourt to hear CBI’s plea challenging the Bombay High Court order allowing Mainak Mehta, the brother-in-law of fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi, who is an accused in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, to visit Hong Kong.
CJI DY Chandrachud: Pass over. Let ASG SV Raju appear #SupremeCourt
ASG: We apprehend that huge money has gone into his accounts. He is not cooperating with access. The letter rogatory has not been responded to.
CJI: Why are you not cooperating? We will record your statement that you are willing to give a letter of authority...
BREAKING: Centre files plea seeking review of the SC judgment declaring Sections 3(2) and 5 introduced through the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act of 2016 as unconstitutional
The 2016 law amended the original Benami Act of 1988, expanding it to 72 Sections from a mere nine #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: This is an unusual request. We seek an open court hearing of the review. Due to this judgment a lot of orders are being passed even though some of the provisions of the benami act was not even under challenge. Like retrospectivity could not have been looked into