Share this page!

Bar & Bench Profile picture
Twitter logo
Jan 30 • 10 tweets • 5 min read
Plea challenging the anti-conversion laws across the country

Senior Adv Kapil Sibal mentions a transfer plea filed in the case for listing

CJI: We will hear it when the item comes up

SG: we filed an affidavit challenging locus of Citizens for Peace and Justice

#SupremeCourt
The case to be taken up today as the matter is listed
#religiousconversion #supremecourt
CJI: There is a transfer plea mentioned in the morning. It was not yet numbered. We can list it, issue notice and hear it together

#religiousconversion #supremecourt
Sr Adv Indira Jaising: My SLP from MP HC is listed today and even the writ is listed

CJI: We can keep this batch on Friday and transfer will also be listed... Let the Attorney General also examine and we can take it up on Friday
#religiousconversion #supremecourt
Singh: there are no replies.. we are praying for interim relief.. give me a moment

CJI: We will do the same thing after hearing for a moment..

Singh: the new acts are virulent and people cannot get married.. this is a grave situation.. states must come forward and file replies
CJI: We will take it up on Friday and hear it...

Adv Vrinda Grover: I appear for the national federation of women to show the effect of these laws on women
#religiousconversion #supremecourt
CJI: If anything is today not on board, just give the numbers to the court master and it will be listed on Friday
#religiousconversion #supremecourt
Jaising: My matter is on board today.. i am praying for an order of notice..

CJI: So is Mr Singh's matter

Jaising: praying for a notice to state of MP

CJI: Keep all the matters for Friday
#religiousconversion #supremecourt
Adv MR Shamshad: I have filed a comprehensive petition challenging all the state laws ( @JamiatUlama_in )
AG: I may have some serious objection to this since petitions are being filed in HC and then here... these are essentially state laws..

CJI: We will hear on Friday
#religiousconversion #supremecourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
Validity of electoral bonds scheme : Supreme Court hear the case on the question whether petitions challenging the electoral bonds scheme need to be referred to Constitution Bench

#SupremeCourt Image
Sr Adv Dushyant Dave, Sr Adv Kapil Sibal appearing

Adv Shadab Farasat: one is about FCRA certification of political funding... one is electoral bonds

AG R Venkataramani: In some of the matters even notice has not been served.
Farasat: another case is bringing political parties under the RTI

Justice Narasimha: all these 3 issues are not overlapping at all

CJI DY Chandrachud: Yes all are different. Has response been filed to electoral bonds?
Read 8 tweets
Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
Supreme Court is hearing plea by the father of a girl who was murdered in Bihar, filed against the Commissioner of Police, Delhi alleging delay in action by the authorities

#SupremeCourt Image
Counsel: they say unknown body was found.. where in a day and age where even the thumb impression is fine to figure out who it is... #supremecourt
CJI DY Chandrachud: we can ask the Delhi police to inform if there was any wrongdoing or delay in working of the police.. tell me.. what did Delhi police do?

Counsel for Delhi police: our counter affidavit will explain in detail what steps were taken
Read 5 tweets
Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
PM Cares Fund is not created under the Constitution of India or by any law made by the Parliament or by any State Legislature, Centre government tells Delhi High Court.
#DelhiHighCourt #PMCaresFund Image
In a detailed affidavit, the Centre has said that there is "no control of either the Central Government or any State Government/s, either direct or indirect, in functioning of the Trust in any manner whatsoever."
#DelhiHighCourt #PMCaresFund
The response states that the composition of the Board of Trustees consisting of holders of Public Office ex Officio is merely for administrative convenience and for smooth succession to the Trusteeship.
#DelhiHighCourt #PMCaresFund
Read 12 tweets
Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
#SupremeCourt to hear Rana Ayyub's plea challenging the jurisdiction of the Ghaziabad court which commenced summons proceedings against her in a PMLA case

Ayyub contends that jurisdiction is of Mumbai, if at all
@RanaAyyub Image
Adv Vrinda Grover: I have been probed and a complaint has been filed against me by ED regarding PMLA. I had raised funds by an online crowdfunding platform. Funds was transferred to Navi mumbai branch of HDFC bank @ketto @RanaAyyub
Grover: FIR in Ghaziabad was the trigger which was lodged at Indirapuram. This FIR has been annexed and weas lodged on September 7, 2021. It was lodged by Vikas S who is founding member of the Hindu IT Cell

@RanaAyyub
Read 30 tweets
Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
#SupremeCourt to hear CBI’s plea challenging the Bombay High Court order allowing Mainak Mehta, the brother-in-law of fugitive diamantaire Nirav Modi, who is an accused in the Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud case, to visit Hong Kong. Image
CJI DY Chandrachud: Pass over. Let ASG SV Raju appear #SupremeCourt
ASG: We apprehend that huge money has gone into his accounts. He is not cooperating with access. The letter rogatory has not been responded to.

CJI: Why are you not cooperating? We will record your statement that you are willing to give a letter of authority...
Read 12 tweets
Bar & Bench Profile picture
Jan 31
BREAKING: Centre files plea seeking review of the SC judgment declaring Sections 3(2) and 5 introduced through the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act of 2016 as unconstitutional

#SupremeCourt Image
The 2016 law amended the original Benami Act of 1988, expanding it to 72 Sections from a mere nine #SupremeCourt
SG Tushar Mehta: This is an unusual request. We seek an open court hearing of the review. Due to this judgment a lot of orders are being passed even though some of the provisions of the benami act was not even under challenge. Like retrospectivity could not have been looked into
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(