#Myth_1 : “Marathas confined Mughal rule only till Delhi in 1770”.

Map posted by @Aabhas24 indicates that Mughal empire is vast than Maratha nobility (part of Mughal empire).

Mirza Najaf Khan (1773 - 81) will conquer more in comming years & extend Mughal territories.

[1/7] ImageImageImage
#Myth_2 : “Hyderbad, Awadh etc were independent from direct Timurid rule”.

Chhatrapati of Satara (officially a slave of Mughal emperor) didnt even control a single town properly, leave aside all these lands which you show as “maratha dominions”.

[2/7]
ImageImage
#Myth_3 : “Maratha conquered Attock and Punjab”.

Mughal forces conquered Attock and Punjab led by Nazim Adina Beg and Subahdar Khawaza Mirza Khan.

Marathas accompanied them as “vassals” according to the treaty with Emperor Ahmad Shah Bahadur.

[3/7]
ImageImageImage
#Myth_4 : “British took Delhi from Daulat rao sindhia (maratha)”.

Daulat rao sindhia was an official of Mughal empire and a slave of Peshwa, who himself was a slave of Emperor Shah Alam, according to his own words.

[4/7]
ImageImageImage
#Myth_5 : “Maratha dominions were vast than Emperor Akbar's dominions”.

Emperor Akbar’s empire spanned upto 9,79,644 miles² ; while you must present ‘analysed area’ of peak maratha dominion.

Just compare the maps below (a graphical refutation).

[5/7]
ImageImageImageImage
Errors in the maps posted by @Aabhas24 :—

#Error_1 : Berar is shown as maratha territory, yet Nizam took 40%-60% of its tribute & appointed governors.

#Error_2 : Jaisalmer & Bikaner weren't maratha vassals or tributaries, yet are shown as maratha territory in 1760 map.

[6/7] ImageImageImageImage
#Error_3 : Bhopal state is shown as maratha territory though Daulat Rao himself failed to prove this when questioned.

#Error_4 : certain Rajput states are shown as maratha territory on the basis that they paid chauth, but at the very same time they paid khiraj to emperor.

[7/7] ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Khanzadah I Awadh

Khanzadah I Awadh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Khanzadah_

Feb 1
#Lie_1 : Nawab Nasir Jung didn't burn Puna & Sir John Malcom is wrong.

Sir J. Malcom’s account (based on contemporary observatory) can't be rejected with mere words.

We have two more contemporary sources that mentions of Nasir Jung ravaging Puna. (Siyar & Hadiqat)

[1/6] ImageImageImage
#Lie_2 : An English letter from Bombay speak of Bajirao's victory.

No such letter exists, if it does then at least cite reference.

Instead, 2 contemporary EIC letters (dated 19th March 1740) mention of Nasir Jung’s victory.

[2/6] ImageImage
#Lie_3 : Chimaji Appa's letter of 8 March 1740 speak of Bajirao's victory.

The letter talks of a skirmish where Nasir Jung was reinforced and small fall back of Phirangoji Pawar, maratha general of Nasir's small right wing detachment not of whole Mughal army.

[3/6] ImageImage
Read 6 tweets
Nov 9, 2022
Be it Bilkis Bano, Asifa or other r∆pe cases — 𝗛¡𝗻𝗱𝘂𝘁𝘃𝗮 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘄𝗮𝘆𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝗿∆𝗮𝗽𝗲 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀. This however is not new;

𝗧𝗛𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗗 🧵 :—
Rapes commited by Hero of H¡ndutva — Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj.

[1/14] Image
Rape of a Brahmin lady.

🔹Sabhasad Bakhar & Chitnis Bakhar, both Maratha sources, mention how Sambhaji raped a Brahmin woman.

🔹Robert Orme (1728 – 1801), an employee of East India Company who he got the information from English factory records, also repeats the event.

[2/14] ImageImageImageImage
Rape of Christian women.

🔹Sir Jadunath Sarkar in his book ‘Aurangzeb and his times, Vol 4’ — has cited first hand Portuguese account — stating how Sambhaji as well as his army engaged in rape.

[3/14] ImageImageImage
Read 14 tweets
Nov 2, 2022
Starting from Nagpur, spread by bollywood & hindutva historians, propagated by YouTube & WhatsApp ; a myth has been spread — 𝗣𝗲𝘀𝗵𝘄𝗮 𝗕𝗮𝗷𝗶 𝗥𝗮𝗼 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗻 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹.

𝗧𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱 🧵:
𝗪𝗮𝘀 𝗣𝗲𝘀𝗵𝘄𝗮 𝗕𝗮𝗷𝗶 𝗥𝗮𝗼 𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 ? Image
Chauvinists boast of Battle of Palkhed - which was actually a victory of Nizam.

Peshwa Baji Rao sustained heavy casualities, his attack was repelled on 6 Nov. 1727 & when he encircled Nizam he could only get formal promise of already confirmed old treaty.

(References attached) ImageImageImage
Peshwa Baji Rao led a campaign in Carnatic along with Fateh Singh Bhosale in 1725 ; but both of them were defeated with heavy losses by Nizam's forces led by Iwaz Khan.

(References attached) ImageImage
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(