This introductory #book on Internal Family Systems (IFS) by the founder of IFS gives a new perspective on what it means to “fix yourself”.
I highly recommend reading about IFS, if not from the book, maybe an online article.
1/ The core idea of IFS is that we are composed of several parts, and that some of the parts are stuck in their childhood.
In short, all issues in adulthood can be traced back to what we experienced as a child.
(IFS is a type of psychoanalysis).
2/ An example of a part being stuck in childhood.
As a child you want attention from your parents and felt abandoned when they didn’t give you that.
As adults, the same part may come to expect the same from relationships and react negatively when the partner is distracted.
3/ I can’t summarise the whole thing.
But the key to “fixing yourself” is to realising that it’s not you who needs fixing but a part of you that’s still stuck in childhood fancies or fears.
Surprisingly, I was able to distinguish multiple parts inside me and talk to them.
4/ Talking to parts means convincing them that you’re an adult now and that they can feel safe and protected.
This sounds woo-woo, but it sort of works.
5/ I didn’t find science behind this, but it roughly aligns with intuition that there is no self in the brain but rather different networks of neurons.
It’s possible some networks remain “stuck” and talking to those networks is simply a way of getting them “unstuck”.
6/ Overall, IFS helped me.
Now, if I feel any negativity towards myself or others, I try to probe what part of me is causing it and why. Then I talk to that part and try to reason it out.
Increasingly most online interactions (including on social media) will be human-to-AI, instead of human-to-human.
a 🧵
1/ The biggest issue with social media is bootstrap problem.
People with 0 followers get no interactions on their content, so have no incentive to publish.
With AI, you have hundreds of personalities ready to give relevant replies to any posted content.
2/ And since AI replies can be made to be super-relevant, and since majority of people don’t have many followers, it turns out that most people will start deriving a lot of value from feedback they get from AI.
A social media app where content creator’s name + photo is hidden in the timeline by default and is only revealed if the user interacts with the content.
This would enable content to stand on its own merit w/o any bias.
You’d still be able to follow people and do all the usual things.
Just that your timeline won’t show you who has posted what unless you really love or hate the content.
This engagement signal can then be used to “boost” content in the timeline to sort most engaging content first.
A game is any activity where artificial set of obstacles where someone struggles to complete them under certain constraints.
2/ Why struggle?
Because games optimize a fit between real world challenges and the experiences find satisfying (i.e. not too. difficult, nor too trivial/boring e.g. playing chess with an opponent of similar challenge level keeps us on our toes, an experience we seek)
Finding a burning problem whose time has come to get solved is how you expand the pie and create wealth for yourself.
when you make something cheaper, faster, better, you don’t just replace the inferior incumbent but also expand the market with new customers to who wouldn’t use existing options due to lack of affordability or convenience.
expanding the pie here means more people using more products to improve their lives, making the average person better off over time